pm24.git/kernel/bpf/verifier.c, branch v4.5-rc7

bpf: fix branch offset adjustment on backjumps after patching ctx expansion

2016-02-10T21:56:47Z

When ctx access is used, the kernel often needs to expand/rewrite instructions, so after that patching, branch offsets have to be adjusted for both forward and backward jumps in the new eBPF program, but for backward jumps it fails to account the delta. Meaning, for example, if the expansion happens exactly on the insn that sits at the jump target, it doesn't fix up the back jump offset. Analysis on what the check in adjust_branches() is currently doing: /* adjust offset of jmps if necessary */ if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos) insn->off += delta; else if (i > pos && i + insn->off + 1 < pos) insn->off -= delta; First condition (forward jumps): Before: After: insns[0] insns[0] insns[1] <--- i/insn insns[1] <--- i/insn insns[2] <--- pos insns[P] <--- pos insns[3] insns[P] `------| delta insns[4] <--- target_X insns[P] `-----| insns[5] insns[3] insns[4] <--- target_X insns[5] First case is if we cross pos-boundary and the jump instruction was before pos. This is handeled correctly. I.e. if i == pos, then this would mean our jump that we currently check was the patchlet itself that we just injected. Since such patchlets are self-contained and have no awareness of any insns before or after the patched one, the delta is correctly not adjusted. Also, for the second condition in case of i + insn->off + 1 == pos, means we jump to that newly patched instruction, so no offset adjustment are needed. That part is correct. Second condition (backward jumps): Before: After: insns[0] insns[0] insns[1] <--- target_X insns[1] <--- target_X insns[2] <--- pos <-- target_Y insns[P] <--- pos <-- target_Y insns[3] insns[P] `------| delta insns[4] <--- i/insn insns[P] `-----| insns[5] insns[3] insns[4] <--- i/insn insns[5] Second interesting case is where we cross pos-boundary and the jump instruction was after pos. Backward jump with i == pos would be impossible and pose a bug somewhere in the patchlet, so the first condition checking i > pos is okay only by itself. However, i + insn->off + 1 < pos does not always work as intended to trigger the adjustment. It works when jump targets would be far off where the delta wouldn't matter. But, for example, where the fixed insn->off before pointed to pos (target_Y), it now points to pos + delta, so that additional room needs to be taken into account for the check. This means that i) both tests here need to be adjusted into pos + delta, and ii) for the second condition, the test needs to be <= as pos itself can be a target in the backjump, too. Fixes: 9bac3d6d548e ("bpf: allow extended BPF programs access skb fields") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: bpf: reject invalid shifts

2016-01-12T22:06:53Z

On ARM64, a BUG() is triggered in the eBPF JIT if a filter with a constant shift that can't be encoded in the immediate field of the UBFM/SBFM instructions is passed to the JIT. Since these shifts amounts, which are negative or >= regsize, are invalid, reject them in the eBPF verifier and the classic BPF filter checker, for all architectures. Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix clearing on persistent program array maps

2015-11-25T17:14:09Z

Currently, when having map file descriptors pointing to program arrays, there's still the issue that we unconditionally flush program array contents via bpf_fd_array_map_clear() in bpf_map_release(). This happens when such a file descriptor is released and is independent of the map's refcount. Having this flush independent of the refcount is for a reason: there can be arbitrary complex dependency chains among tail calls, also circular ones (direct or indirect, nesting limit determined during runtime), and we need to make sure that the map drops all references to eBPF programs it holds, so that the map's refcount can eventually drop to zero and initiate its freeing. Btw, a walk of the whole dependency graph would not be possible for various reasons, one being complexity and another one inconsistency, i.e. new programs can be added to parts of the graph at any time, so there's no guaranteed consistent state for the time of such a walk. Now, the program array pinning itself works, but the issue is that each derived file descriptor on close would nevertheless call unconditionally into bpf_fd_array_map_clear(). Instead, keep track of users and postpone this flush until the last reference to a user is dropped. As this only concerns a subset of references (f.e. a prog array could hold a program that itself has reference on the prog array holding it, etc), we need to track them separately. Short analysis on the refcounting: on map creation time usercnt will be one, so there's no change in behaviour for bpf_map_release(), if unpinned. If we already fail in map_create(), we are immediately freed, and no file descriptor has been made public yet. In bpf_obj_pin_user(), we need to probe for a possible map in bpf_fd_probe_obj() already with a usercnt reference, so before we drop the reference on the fd with fdput(). Therefore, if actual pinning fails, we need to drop that reference again in bpf_any_put(), otherwise we keep holding it. When last reference drops on the inode, the bpf_any_put() in bpf_evict_inode() will take care of dropping the usercnt again. In the bpf_obj_get_user() case, the bpf_any_get() will grab a reference on the usercnt, still at a time when we have the reference on the path. Should we later on fail to grab a new file descriptor, bpf_any_put() will drop it, otherwise we hold it until bpf_map_release() time. Joint work with Alexei. Fixes: b2197755b263 ("bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf, verifier: annotate verbose printer with __printf

2015-11-03T16:29:56Z

The verbose() printer dumps the verifier state to user space, so let gcc take care to check calls to verbose() for (future) errors. make with W=1 correctly suggests: function might be possible candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: align and clean bpf_{map,prog}_get helpers

2015-11-03T03:48:39Z

Add a bpf_map_get() function that we're going to use later on and align/clean the remaining helpers a bit so that we have them a bit more consistent: - __bpf_map_get() and __bpf_prog_get() that both work on the fd struct, check whether the descriptor is eBPF and return the pointer to the map/prog stored in the private data. Also, we can return f.file->private_data directly, the function signature is enough of a documentation already. - bpf_map_get() and bpf_prog_get() that both work on u32 user fd, call their respective __bpf_map_get()/__bpf_prog_get() variants, and take a reference. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper

2015-10-22T13:42:15Z

This helper is used to send raw data from eBPF program into special PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE/PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT perf_event. User space needs to perf_event_open() it (either for one or all cpus) and store FD into perf_event_array (similar to bpf_perf_event_read() helper) before eBPF program can send data into it. Today the programs triggered by kprobe collect the data and either store it into the maps or print it via bpf_trace_printk() where latter is the debug facility and not suitable to stream the data. This new helper replaces such bpf_trace_printk() usage and allows programs to have dedicated channel into user space for post-processing of the raw data collected. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs

2015-10-13T02:13:35Z

In order to let unprivileged users load and execute eBPF programs teach verifier to prevent pointer leaks. Verifier will prevent - any arithmetic on pointers (except R10+Imm which is used to compute stack addresses) - comparison of pointers (except if (map_value_ptr == 0) ... ) - passing pointers to helper functions - indirectly passing pointers in stack to helper functions - returning pointer from bpf program - storing pointers into ctx or maps Spill/fill of pointers into stack is allowed, but mangling of pointers stored in the stack or reading them byte by byte is not. Within bpf programs the pointers do exist, since programs need to be able to access maps, pass skb pointer to LD_ABS insns, etc but programs cannot pass such pointer values to the outside or obfuscate them. Only allow BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER unprivileged programs, so that socket filters (tcpdump), af_packet (quic acceleration) and future kcm can use it. tracing and tc cls/act program types still require root permissions, since tracing actually needs to be able to see all kernel pointers and tc is for root only. For example, the following unprivileged socket filter program is allowed: int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb) { u32 index = load_byte(skb, ETH_HLEN + offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol)); u64 *value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&my_map, &index); if (value) *value += skb->len; return 0; } but the following program is not: int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb) { u32 index = load_byte(skb, ETH_HLEN + offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol)); u64 *value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&my_map, &index); if (value) *value += (u64) skb; return 0; } since it would leak the kernel address into the map. Unprivileged socket filter bpf programs have access to the following helper functions: - map lookup/update/delete (but they cannot store kernel pointers into them) - get_random (it's already exposed to unprivileged user space) - get_smp_processor_id - tail_call into another socket filter program - ktime_get_ns The feature is controlled by sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This toggle defaults to off (0), but can be set true (1). Once true, bpf programs and maps cannot be accessed from unprivileged process, and the toggle cannot be set back to false. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix cb access in socket filter programs

2015-10-11T11:40:05Z

eBPF socket filter programs may see junk in 'u32 cb[5]' area, since it could have been used by protocol layers earlier. For socket filter programs used in af_packet we need to clean 20 bytes of skb->cb area if it could be used by the program. For programs attached to TCP/UDP sockets we need to save/restore these 20 bytes, since it's used by protocol layers. Remove SK_RUN_FILTER macro, since it's no longer used. Long term we may move this bpf cb area to per-cpu scratch, but that requires addition of new 'per-cpu load/store' instructions, so not suitable as a short term fix. Fixes: d691f9e8d440 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix out of bounds access in verifier log

2015-09-09T21:11:55Z

when the verifier log is enabled the print_bpf_insn() is doing bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4] and bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4] where BPF_OP is a 4-bit instruction opcode. Malformed insns can cause out of bounds access. Fix it by sizing arrays appropriately. The bug was found by clang address sanitizer with libfuzzer. Reported-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() loop upper bound

2015-08-12T23:42:50Z

Verifier rejects programs incorrectly. Fixes: 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read()") Cc: Kaixu Xia Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Wei-Chun Chao Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller