pm24.git/kernel/exit.c, branch v2.6.15

[PATCH] m68k: introduce task_thread_info

2005-11-14T02:14:13Z

new helper - task_thread_info(task). On platforms that have thread_info allocated separately (i.e. in default case) it simply returns task->thread_info. m68k wants (and for good reasons) to embed its thread_info into task_struct. So it will (in later patch) have task_thread_info() of its own. For now we just add a macro for generic case and convert existing instances of its body in core kernel to uses of new macro. Obviously safe - all normal architectures get the same preprocessor output they used to get. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] Process Events Connector

2005-11-07T15:53:35Z

This patch adds a connector that reports fork, exec, id change, and exit events for all processes to userspace. It replaces the fork_advisor patch that ELSA is currently using. Applications that may find these events useful include accounting/auditing (e.g. ELSA), system activity monitoring (e.g. top), security, and resource management (e.g. CKRM). Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] remove hardcoded SEND_SIG_xxx constants

2005-10-31T01:37:31Z

This patch replaces hardcoded SEND_SIG_xxx constants with their symbolic names. No changes in affected .o files. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] wait4 PTRACE_ATTACH race fix

2005-10-31T01:37:24Z

Back about a year ago when I last fiddled heavily with the do_wait code, I was thinking too hard about the wrong thing and I now think I introduced a bug whose inverse thought I was fixing. Apparently noone was looking too hard over much shoulder, so as to cite my bogus reasoning at the time. In the race condition when PTRACE_ATTACH is about to steal a child and then the child hits a tracing event (what my_ptrace_child checks for), the real parent does need to set its flag noting it has some eligible live children. Otherwise a spurious ECHILD error is possible, since the child in question is not yet on the ptrace_children list. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] PF_DEAD cleanup

2005-10-31T01:37:23Z

The PF_DEAD setting doesn't belong to exit_notify(), move it to a proper place. Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] mm: update_hiwaters just in time

2005-10-30T04:40:39Z

update_mem_hiwater has attracted various criticisms, in particular from those concerned with mm scalability. Originally it was called whenever rss or total_vm got raised. Then many of those callsites were replaced by a timer tick call from account_system_time. Now Frank van Maarseveen reports that to be found inadequate. How about this? Works for Frank. Replace update_mem_hiwater, a poor combination of two unrelated ops, by macros update_hiwater_rss and update_hiwater_vm. Don't attempt to keep mm->hiwater_rss up to date at timer tick, nor every time we raise rss (usually by 1): those are hot paths. Do the opposite, update only when about to lower rss (usually by many), or just before final accounting in do_exit. Handle mm->hiwater_vm in the same way, though it's much less of an issue. Demand that whoever collects these hiwater statistics do the work of taking the maximum with rss or total_vm. And there has been no collector of these hiwater statistics in the tree. The new convention needs an example, so match Frank's usage by adding a VmPeak line above VmSize to /proc//status, and also a VmHWM line above VmRSS (High-Water-Mark or High-Water-Memory). There was a particular anomaly during mremap move, that hiwater_vm might be captured too high. A fleeting such anomaly remains, but it's quickly corrected now, whereas before it would stick. What locking? None: if the app is racy then these statistics will be racy, it's not worth any overhead to make them exact. But whenever it suits, hiwater_vm is updated under exclusive mmap_sem, and hiwater_rss under page_table_lock (for now) or with preemption disabled (later on): without going to any trouble, minimize the time between reading current values and updating, to minimize those occasions when a racing thread bumps a count up and back down in between. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Revert "remove false BUG_ON() from run_posix_cpu_timers()"

2005-10-27T16:07:33Z

This reverts commit 3de463c7d9d58f8cf3395268230cb20a4c15bffa. Roland has another patch that allows us to leave the BUG_ON() in place by just making sure that the condition it tests for really is always true. That goes in next. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] posix-timers: remove false BUG_ON() from run_posix_cpu_timers()

2005-10-24T15:12:35Z

do_exit() clears ->it_##clock##_expires, but nothing prevents another cpu to attach the timer to exiting process after that. After exit_notify() does 'write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock)' and before do_exit() calls 'schedule() local timer interrupt can find tsk->exit_state != 0. If that state was EXIT_DEAD (or another cpu does sys_wait4) interrupted task has ->signal == NULL. At this moment exiting task has no pending cpu timers, they were cleaned up in __exit_signal()->posix_cpu_timers_exit{,_group}(), so we can just return from irq. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] Call exit_itimers from do_exit, not __exit_signal

2005-10-21T22:38:08Z

When I originally moved exit_itimers into __exit_signal, that was the only place where we could reliably know it was the last thread in the group dying, without races. Since then we've gotten the signal_struct.live counter, and do_exit can reliably do group-wide cleanup work. This patch moves the call to do_exit, where it's made without locks. This avoids the deadlock issues that the old __exit_signal code's comment talks about, and the one that Oleg found recently with process CPU timers. [ This replaces e03d13e985d48ac4885382c9e3b1510c78bd047f, which is why it was just reverted. ] Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Fix inequality comparison against "task->state"

2005-10-01T18:04:18Z

We should always use bitmask ops, rather than depend on some ordering of the different states. With the TASK_NONINTERACTIVE flag, the inequality doesn't really work. Oleg Nesterov argues (likely correctly) that this test is unnecessary in the first place. However, the minimal fix for now is to at least make it work in the presense of TASK_NONINTERACTIVE. Waiting for consensus from Roland & co on potential bigger cleanups. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds