<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>pm24.git/security/selinux/include, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.</subtitle>
<id>https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/atom/security/selinux/include?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/atom/security/selinux/include?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/'/>
<updated>2024-11-19T01:34:05Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'lsm-pr-20241112' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm</title>
<updated>2024-11-19T01:34:05Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-11-19T01:34:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=5591fd5e034819a89ac93c0ccc6be2a930042f71'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5591fd5e034819a89ac93c0ccc6be2a930042f71</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore:
 "Thirteen patches, all focused on moving away from the current 'secid'
  LSM identifier to a richer 'lsm_prop' structure.

  This move will help reduce the translation that is necessary in many
  LSMs, offering better performance, and make it easier to support
  different LSMs in the future"

* tag 'lsm-pr-20241112' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm:
  lsm: remove lsm_prop scaffolding
  netlabel,smack: use lsm_prop for audit data
  audit: change context data from secid to lsm_prop
  lsm: create new security_cred_getlsmprop LSM hook
  audit: use an lsm_prop in audit_names
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_inode_getsecid
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_current_getsecid
  audit: update shutdown LSM data
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_ipc_getsecid
  audit: maintain an lsm_prop in audit_context
  lsm: add lsmprop_to_secctx hook
  lsm: use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_match
  lsm: add the lsm_prop data structure
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>lsm: add lsmprop_to_secctx hook</title>
<updated>2024-10-11T18:34:12Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Casey Schaufler</name>
<email>casey@schaufler-ca.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-09T17:32:11Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=6f2f724f0e116d9ea960ff3dd645add12e60e176'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6f2f724f0e116d9ea960ff3dd645add12e60e176</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a new hook security_lsmprop_to_secctx() and its LSM specific
implementations. The LSM specific code will use the lsm_prop element
allocated for that module. This allows for the possibility that more
than one module may be called upon to translate a secid to a string,
as can occur in the audit code.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler &lt;casey@schaufler-ca.com&gt;
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>lsm: use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_match</title>
<updated>2024-10-11T18:34:12Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Casey Schaufler</name>
<email>casey@schaufler-ca.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-09T17:32:10Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=870b7fdc660b38c4e1bd8bf48e62aa352ddf8f42'/>
<id>urn:sha1:870b7fdc660b38c4e1bd8bf48e62aa352ddf8f42</id>
<content type='text'>
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsm_prop structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsm_prop structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.

Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsm_prop instead of a u32. The scaffolding function lsmprop_init()
fills the structure with the value of the old secid, ensuring that
it is available to the appropriate module hook. The sources of
the secid, security_task_getsecid() and security_inode_getsecid(),
will be converted to use the lsm_prop structure later in the series.
At that point the use of lsmprop_init() is dropped.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler &lt;casey@schaufler-ca.com&gt;
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selinux: Add netlink xperm support</title>
<updated>2024-10-07T20:28:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Thiébaud Weksteen</name>
<email>tweek@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-12T01:45:03Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=d1d991efaf34606d500dcbd28bedc0666eeec8e2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d1d991efaf34606d500dcbd28bedc0666eeec8e2</id>
<content type='text'>
Reuse the existing extended permissions infrastructure to support
policies based on the netlink message types.

A new policy capability "netlink_xperm" is introduced. When disabled,
the previous behaviour is preserved. That is, netlink_send will rely on
the permission mappings defined in nlmsgtab.c (e.g, nlmsg_read for
RTM_GETADDR on NETLINK_ROUTE). When enabled, the mappings are ignored
and the generic "nlmsg" permission is used instead.

The new "nlmsg" permission is an extended permission. The 16 bits of the
extended permission are mapped to the nlmsg_type field.

Example policy on Android, preventing regular apps from accessing the
device's MAC address and ARP table, but allowing this access to
privileged apps, looks as follows:

allow netdomain self:netlink_route_socket {
	create read getattr write setattr lock append connect getopt
	setopt shutdown nlmsg
};
allowxperm netdomain self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg ~{
	RTM_GETLINK RTM_GETNEIGH RTM_GETNEIGHTBL
};
allowxperm priv_app self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg {
	RTM_GETLINK RTM_GETNEIGH RTM_GETNEIGHTBL
};

The constants in the example above (e.g., RTM_GETLINK) are explicitly
defined in the policy.

It is possible to generate policies to support kernels that may or
may not have the capability enabled by generating a rule for each
scenario. For instance:

allow domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg_read;
allow domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg;
allowxperm domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg { AUDIT_GET };

The approach of defining a new permission ("nlmsg") instead of relying
on the existing permissions (e.g., "nlmsg_read", "nlmsg_readpriv" or
"nlmsg_tty_audit") has been preferred because:
  1. This is similar to the other extended permission ("ioctl");
  2. With the new extended permission, the coarse-grained mapping is not
     necessary anymore. It could eventually be removed, which would be
     impossible if the extended permission was defined below these.
  3. Having a single extra extended permission considerably simplifies
     the implementation here and in libselinux.

Signed-off-by: Thiébaud Weksteen &lt;tweek@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Bram Bonné &lt;brambonne@google.com&gt;
[PM: manual merge fixes for sock_skip_has_perm()]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selinux: do not include &lt;linux/*.h&gt; headers from host programs</title>
<updated>2024-10-03T19:34:24Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-06T17:29:13Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=541b57e313683b3d4c365fe3109fb34828b165cd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:541b57e313683b3d4c365fe3109fb34828b165cd</id>
<content type='text'>
The header, security/selinux/include/classmap.h, is included not only
from kernel space but also from host programs.

It includes &lt;linux/capability.h&gt; and &lt;linux/socket.h&gt;, which pull in
more &lt;linux/*.h&gt; headers. This makes the host programs less portable,
specifically causing build errors on macOS.

Those headers are included for the following purposes:

 - &lt;linux/capability.h&gt; for checking CAP_LAST_CAP
 - &lt;linux/socket.h&gt; for checking PF_MAX

These checks can be guarded by __KERNEL__ so they are skipped when
building host programs. Testing them when building the kernel should
be sufficient.

The header, security/selinux/include/initial_sid_to_string.h, includes
&lt;linux/stddef.h&gt; for the NULL definition, but this is not portable
either. Instead, &lt;stddef.h&gt; should be included for host programs.

Reported-by: Daniel Gomez &lt;da.gomez@samsung.com&gt;
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240807-macos-build-support-v1-6-4cd1ded85694@samsung.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240807-macos-build-support-v1-7-4cd1ded85694@samsung.com/
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'lsm-pr-20240911' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm</title>
<updated>2024-09-16T16:19:47Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-16T16:19:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=a430d95c5efa2b545d26a094eb5f624e36732af0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a430d95c5efa2b545d26a094eb5f624e36732af0</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore:

 - Move the LSM framework to static calls

   This transitions the vast majority of the LSM callbacks into static
   calls. Those callbacks which haven't been converted were left as-is
   due to the general ugliness of the changes required to support the
   static call conversion; we can revisit those callbacks at a future
   date.

 - Add the Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) LSM

   This adds a new LSM, Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE). There is
   plenty of documentation about IPE in this patches, so I'll refrain
   from going into too much detail here, but the basic motivation behind
   IPE is to provide a mechanism such that administrators can restrict
   execution to only those binaries which come from integrity protected
   storage, e.g. a dm-verity protected filesystem. You will notice that
   IPE requires additional LSM hooks in the initramfs, dm-verity, and
   fs-verity code, with the associated patches carrying ACK/review tags
   from the associated maintainers. We couldn't find an obvious
   maintainer for the initramfs code, but the IPE patchset has been
   widely posted over several years.

   Both Deven Bowers and Fan Wu have contributed to IPE's development
   over the past several years, with Fan Wu agreeing to serve as the IPE
   maintainer moving forward. Once IPE is accepted into your tree, I'll
   start working with Fan to ensure he has the necessary accounts, keys,
   etc. so that he can start submitting IPE pull requests to you
   directly during the next merge window.

 - Move the lifecycle management of the LSM blobs to the LSM framework

   Management of the LSM blobs (the LSM state buffers attached to
   various kernel structs, typically via a void pointer named "security"
   or similar) has been mixed, some blobs were allocated/managed by
   individual LSMs, others were managed by the LSM framework itself.

   Starting with this pull we move management of all the LSM blobs,
   minus the XFRM blob, into the framework itself, improving consistency
   across LSMs, and reducing the amount of duplicated code across LSMs.
   Due to some additional work required to migrate the XFRM blob, it has
   been left as a todo item for a later date; from a practical
   standpoint this omission should have little impact as only SELinux
   provides a XFRM LSM implementation.

 - Fix problems with the LSM's handling of F_SETOWN

   The LSM hook for the fcntl(F_SETOWN) operation had a couple of
   problems: it was racy with itself, and it was disconnected from the
   associated DAC related logic in such a way that the LSM state could
   be updated in cases where the DAC state would not. We fix both of
   these problems by moving the security_file_set_fowner() hook into the
   same section of code where the DAC attributes are updated. Not only
   does this resolve the DAC/LSM synchronization issue, but as that code
   block is protected by a lock, it also resolve the race condition.

 - Fix potential problems with the security_inode_free() LSM hook

   Due to use of RCU to protect inodes and the placement of the LSM hook
   associated with freeing the inode, there is a bit of a challenge when
   it comes to managing any LSM state associated with an inode. The VFS
   folks are not open to relocating the LSM hook so we have to get
   creative when it comes to releasing an inode's LSM state.
   Traditionally we have used a single LSM callback within the hook that
   is triggered when the inode is "marked for death", but not actually
   released due to RCU.

   Unfortunately, this causes problems for LSMs which want to take an
   action when the inode's associated LSM state is actually released; so
   we add an additional LSM callback, inode_free_security_rcu(), that is
   called when the inode's LSM state is released in the RCU free
   callback.

 - Refactor two LSM hooks to better fit the LSM return value patterns

   The vast majority of the LSM hooks follow the "return 0 on success,
   negative values on failure" pattern, however, there are a small
   handful that have unique return value behaviors which has caused
   confusion in the past and makes it difficult for the BPF verifier to
   properly vet BPF LSM programs. This includes patches to
   convert two of these"special" LSM hooks to the common 0/-ERRNO pattern.

 - Various cleanups and improvements

   A handful of patches to remove redundant code, better leverage the
   IS_ERR_OR_NULL() helper, add missing "static" markings, and do some
   minor style fixups.

* tag 'lsm-pr-20240911' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm: (40 commits)
  security: Update file_set_fowner documentation
  fs: Fix file_set_fowner LSM hook inconsistencies
  lsm: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() helper function
  lsm: remove LSM_COUNT and LSM_CONFIG_COUNT
  ipe: Remove duplicated include in ipe.c
  lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
  lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time
  kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling
  init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code, static keys and calls.
  MAINTAINERS: add IPE entry with Fan Wu as maintainer
  documentation: add IPE documentation
  ipe: kunit test for parser
  scripts: add boot policy generation program
  ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider
  fsverity: expose verified fsverity built-in signatures to LSMs
  lsm: add security_inode_setintegrity() hook
  ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider
  dm-verity: expose root hash digest and signature data to LSMs
  block,lsm: add LSM blob and new LSM hooks for block devices
  ipe: add permissive toggle
  ...
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selinux: fix style problems in security/selinux/include/audit.h</title>
<updated>2024-09-03T22:54:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Moore</name>
<email>paul@paul-moore.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-03T22:53:20Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=d19a9e25a722d629041ac8fd320a86c016e349d1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d19a9e25a722d629041ac8fd320a86c016e349d1</id>
<content type='text'>
Remove the needless indent in the function comment header blocks.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>lsm: infrastructure management of the perf_event security blob</title>
<updated>2024-07-29T20:54:52Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Casey Schaufler</name>
<email>casey@schaufler-ca.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-10T21:32:30Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=61a1dcdceb44d79e5ab511295791b88ea178c045'/>
<id>urn:sha1:61a1dcdceb44d79e5ab511295791b88ea178c045</id>
<content type='text'>
Move management of the perf_event-&gt;security blob out of the individual
security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of
allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the
infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated
there.  There are no longer any modules that require the perf_event_free()
hook.  The hook definition has been removed.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler &lt;casey@schaufler-ca.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: John Johansen &lt;john.johansen@canonical.com&gt;
[PM: subject tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>lsm: infrastructure management of the infiniband blob</title>
<updated>2024-07-29T20:54:52Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Casey Schaufler</name>
<email>casey@schaufler-ca.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-10T21:32:29Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=66de33a0bbb59ef3909d2c65dbbb7fc503d573bd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:66de33a0bbb59ef3909d2c65dbbb7fc503d573bd</id>
<content type='text'>
Move management of the infiniband security blob out of the individual
security modules and into the LSM infrastructure.  The security modules
tell the infrastructure how much space they require at initialization.
There are no longer any modules that require the ib_free() hook.
The hook definition has been removed.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler &lt;casey@schaufler-ca.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: John Johansen &lt;john.johansen@canonical.com&gt;
[PM: subject tweak, selinux style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>lsm: infrastructure management of the dev_tun blob</title>
<updated>2024-07-29T20:54:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Casey Schaufler</name>
<email>casey@schaufler-ca.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-10T21:32:28Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kobert.dev/pm24.git/commit/?id=a39c0f77dbbe083f3eec6c3b32d90f168f7575eb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a39c0f77dbbe083f3eec6c3b32d90f168f7575eb</id>
<content type='text'>
Move management of the dev_tun security blob out of the individual
security modules and into the LSM infrastructure.  The security modules
tell the infrastructure how much space they require at initialization.
There are no longer any modules that require the dev_tun_free hook.
The hook definition has been removed.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler &lt;casey@schaufler-ca.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: John Johansen &lt;john.johansen@canonical.com&gt;
[PM: subject tweak, selinux style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore &lt;paul@paul-moore.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
