pm24.git/virt, branch rust-fixes-6.12

Merge tag 'pull-stable-struct_fd' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2024-09-23T16:35:36Z

Pull 'struct fd' updates from Al Viro: "Just the 'struct fd' layout change, with conversion to accessor helpers" * tag 'pull-stable-struct_fd' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: add struct fd constructors, get rid of __to_fd() struct fd: representation change introduce fd_file(), convert all accessors to it.

KVM: use follow_pfnmap API

2024-09-17T08:06:59Z

Use the new pfnmap API to allow huge MMIO mappings for VMs. The rest work is done perfectly on the other side (host_pfn_mapping_level()). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240826204353.2228736-11-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Sean Christopherson Cc: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Gavin Shan Cc: Gerald Schaefer Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Niklas Schnelle Cc: Ryan Roberts Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

KVM: x86: Disallow read-only memslots for SEV-ES and SEV-SNP (and TDX)

2024-08-14T16:28:24Z

Disallow read-only memslots for SEV-{ES,SNP} VM types, as KVM can't directly emulate instructions for ES/SNP, and instead the guest must explicitly request emulation. Unless the guest explicitly requests emulation without accessing memory, ES/SNP relies on KVM creating an MMIO SPTE, with the subsequent #NPF being reflected into the guest as a #VC. But for read-only memslots, KVM deliberately doesn't create MMIO SPTEs, because except for ES/SNP, doing so requires setting reserved bits in the SPTE, i.e. the SPTE can't be readable while also generating a #VC on writes. Because KVM never creates MMIO SPTEs and jumps directly to emulation, the guest never gets a #VC. And since KVM simply resumes the guest if ES/SNP guests trigger emulation, KVM effectively puts the vCPU into an infinite #NPF loop if the vCPU attempts to write read-only memory. Disallow read-only memory for all VMs with protected state, i.e. for upcoming TDX VMs as well as ES/SNP VMs. For TDX, it's actually possible to support read-only memory, as TDX uses EPT Violation #VE to reflect the fault into the guest, e.g. KVM could configure read-only SPTEs with RX protections and SUPPRESS_VE=0. But there is no strong use case for supporting read-only memslots on TDX, e.g. the main historical usage is to emulate option ROMs, but TDX disallows executing from shared memory. And if someone comes along with a legitimate, strong use case, the restriction can always be lifted for TDX. Don't bother trying to retroactively apply the restriction to SEV-ES VMs that are created as type KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM. Read-only memslots can't possibly work for SEV-ES, i.e. disallowing such memslots is really just means reporting an error to userspace instead of silently hanging vCPUs. Trying to deal with the ordering between KVM_SEV_INIT and memslot creation isn't worth the marginal benefit it would provide userspace. Fixes: 26c44aa9e076 ("KVM: SEV: define VM types for SEV and SEV-ES") Fixes: 1dfe571c12cf ("KVM: SEV: Add initial SEV-SNP support") Cc: Peter Gonda Cc: Michael Roth Cc: Vishal Annapurve Cc: Ackerly Tng Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Message-ID: <20240809190319.1710470-2-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: eventfd: Use synchronize_srcu_expedited() on shutdown

2024-08-13T16:09:35Z

When hot-unplug a device which has many queues, and guest CPU will has huge jitter, and unplugging is very slow. It turns out synchronize_srcu() in irqfd_shutdown() caused the guest jitter and unplugging latency, so replace synchronize_srcu() with synchronize_srcu_expedited(), to accelerate the unplugging, and reduce the guest OS jitter, this accelerates the VM reboot too. Signed-off-by: Li RongQing Message-ID: <20240711121130.38917-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> [Call it just once in irqfd_resampler_shutdown. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

introduce fd_file(), convert all accessors to it.

2024-08-13T02:00:43Z

For any changes of struct fd representation we need to turn existing accesses to fields into calls of wrappers. Accesses to struct fd::flags are very few (3 in linux/file.h, 1 in net/socket.c, 3 in fs/overlayfs/file.c and 3 more in explicit initializers). Those can be dealt with in the commit converting to new layout; accesses to struct fd::file are too many for that. This commit converts (almost) all of f.file to fd_file(f). It's not entirely mechanical ('file' is used as a member name more than just in struct fd) and it does not even attempt to distinguish the uses in pointer context from those in boolean context; the latter will be eventually turned into a separate helper (fd_empty()). NOTE: mass conversion to fd_empty(), tempting as it might be, is a bad idea; better do that piecewise in commit that convert from fdget...() to CLASS(...). [conflicts in fs/fhandle.c, kernel/bpf/syscall.c, mm/memcontrol.c caught by git; fs/stat.c one got caught by git grep] [fs/xattr.c conflict] Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Al Viro

KVM: guest_memfd: abstract how prepared folios are recorded

2024-07-26T18:46:15Z

Right now, large folios are not supported in guest_memfd, and therefore the order used by kvm_gmem_populate() is always 0. In this scenario, using the up-to-date bit to track prepared-ness is nice and easy because we have one bit available per page. In the future, however, we might have large pages that are partially populated; for example, in the case of SEV-SNP, if a large page has both shared and private areas inside, it is necessary to populate it at a granularity that is smaller than that of the guest_memfd's backing store. In that case we will have to track preparedness at a 4K level, probably as a bitmap. In preparation for that, do not use explicitly folio_test_uptodate() and folio_mark_uptodate(). Return the state of the page directly from __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(), so that it is expected to apply to 2^N pages with N=*max_order. The function to mark a range as prepared for now takes just a folio, but is expected to take also an index and order (or something like that) when large pages are introduced. Thanks to Michael Roth for pointing out the issue with large pages. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: guest_memfd: let kvm_gmem_populate() operate only on private gfns

2024-07-26T18:46:15Z

This check is currently performed by sev_gmem_post_populate(), but it applies to all callers of kvm_gmem_populate(): the point of the function is that the memory is being encrypted and some work has to be done on all the gfns in order to encrypt them. Therefore, check the KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE attribute prior to invoking the callback, and stop the operation if a shared page is encountered. Because CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM in principle does not require attributes, this makes kvm_gmem_populate() depend on CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM (which does require them). Reviewed-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: extend kvm_range_has_memory_attributes() to check subset of attributes

2024-07-26T18:46:15Z

While currently there is no other attribute than KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE, KVM code such as kvm_mem_is_private() is written to expect their existence. Allow using kvm_range_has_memory_attributes() as a multi-page version of kvm_mem_is_private(), without it breaking later when more attributes are introduced. Reviewed-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: cleanup and add shortcuts to kvm_range_has_memory_attributes()

2024-07-26T18:46:14Z

Use a guard to simplify early returns, and add two more easy shortcuts. If the requested attributes are invalid, the attributes xarray will never show them as set. And if testing a single page, kvm_get_memory_attributes() is more efficient. Reviewed-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: guest_memfd: move check for already-populated page to common code

2024-07-26T18:46:14Z

Do not allow populating the same page twice with startup data. In the case of SEV-SNP, for example, the firmware does not allow it anyway, since the launch-update operation is only possible on pages that are still shared in the RMP. Even if it worked, kvm_gmem_populate()'s callback is meant to have side effects such as updating launch measurements, and updating the same page twice is unlikely to have the desired results. Races between calls to the ioctl are not possible because kvm_gmem_populate() holds slots_lock and the VM should not be running. But again, even if this worked on other confidential computing technology, it doesn't matter to guest_memfd.c whether this is something fishy such as missing synchronization in userspace, or rather something intentional. One of the racers wins, and the page is initialized by either kvm_gmem_prepare_folio() or kvm_gmem_populate(). Anyway, out of paranoia, adjust sev_gmem_post_populate() anyway to use the same errno that kvm_gmem_populate() is using. Reviewed-by: Michael Roth Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini