diff options
author | Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> | 2017-09-13 12:24:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-10-10 11:45:30 +0200 |
commit | 93824900a2e242766f5fe6ae7697e3d7171aa234 (patch) | |
tree | ee7fe4c785618a9e5bef06627c6910e5dfed22de | |
parent | 051f3ca02e46432c0965e8948f00c07d8a2f09c0 (diff) |
sched/fair: Search a task from the tail of the queue
As a first step this patch makes cfs_tasks list as MRU one.
It means, that when a next task is picked to run on physical
CPU it is moved to the front of the list.
Therefore, the cfs_tasks list is more or less sorted (except
woken tasks) starting from recently given CPU time tasks toward
tasks with max wait time in a run-queue, i.e. MRU list.
Second, as part of the load balance operation, this approach
starts detach_tasks()/detach_one_task() from the tail of the
queue instead of the head, giving some advantages:
- tends to pick a task with highest wait time;
- tasks located in the tail are less likely cache-hot,
therefore the can_migrate_task() decision is higher.
hackbench illustrates slightly better performance. For example
doing 1000 samples and 40 groups on i5-3320M CPU, it shows below
figures:
default: 0.657 avg
patched: 0.646 avg
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170913102430.8985-2-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index ac6602c5f36f..cc0bfb035df9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6628,10 +6628,7 @@ again: set_next_entity(cfs_rq, se); } - if (hrtick_enabled(rq)) - hrtick_start_fair(rq, p); - - return p; + goto done; simple: #endif @@ -6645,6 +6642,16 @@ simple: p = task_of(se); +done: __maybe_unused +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + /* + * Move the next running task to the front of + * the list, so our cfs_tasks list becomes MRU + * one. + */ + list_move(&p->se.group_node, &rq->cfs_tasks); +#endif + if (hrtick_enabled(rq)) hrtick_start_fair(rq, p); @@ -7080,11 +7087,12 @@ static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) */ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) { - struct task_struct *p, *n; + struct task_struct *p; lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) { + list_for_each_entry_reverse(p, + &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) { if (!can_migrate_task(p, env)) continue; @@ -7130,7 +7138,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1) break; - p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node); + p = list_last_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node); env->loop++; /* We've more or less seen every task there is, call it quits */ @@ -7180,7 +7188,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) continue; next: - list_move_tail(&p->se.group_node, tasks); + list_move(&p->se.group_node, tasks); } /* |