Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm

Pull kvm updates from Paolo Bonzini:
 "ARM:
   - GICv4.1 support

   - 32bit host removal

  PPC:
   - secure (encrypted) using under the Protected Execution Framework
     ultravisor

  s390:
   - allow disabling GISA (hardware interrupt injection) and protected
     VMs/ultravisor support.

  x86:
   - New dirty bitmap flag that sets all bits in the bitmap when dirty
     page logging is enabled; this is faster because it doesn't require
     bulk modification of the page tables.

   - Initial work on making nested SVM event injection more similar to
     VMX, and less buggy.

   - Various cleanups to MMU code (though the big ones and related
     optimizations were delayed to 5.8). Instead of using cr3 in
     function names which occasionally means eptp, KVM too has
     standardized on "pgd".

   - A large refactoring of CPUID features, which now use an array that
     parallels the core x86_features.

   - Some removal of pointer chasing from kvm_x86_ops, which will also
     be switched to static calls as soon as they are available.

   - New Tigerlake CPUID features.

   - More bugfixes, optimizations and cleanups.

  Generic:
   - selftests: cleanups, new MMU notifier stress test, steal-time test

   - CSV output for kvm_stat"

* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (277 commits)
  x86/kvm: fix a missing-prototypes "vmread_error"
  KVM: x86: Fix BUILD_BUG() in __cpuid_entry_get_reg() w/ CONFIG_UBSAN=y
  KVM: VMX: Add a trampoline to fix VMREAD error handling
  KVM: SVM: Annotate svm_x86_ops as __initdata
  KVM: VMX: Annotate vmx_x86_ops as __initdata
  KVM: x86: Drop __exit from kvm_x86_ops' hardware_unsetup()
  KVM: x86: Copy kvm_x86_ops by value to eliminate layer of indirection
  KVM: x86: Set kvm_x86_ops only after ->hardware_setup() completes
  KVM: VMX: Configure runtime hooks using vmx_x86_ops
  KVM: VMX: Move hardware_setup() definition below vmx_x86_ops
  KVM: x86: Move init-only kvm_x86_ops to separate struct
  KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs
  s390/gmap: return proper error code on ksm unsharing
  KVM: selftests: Fix cosmetic copy-paste error in vm_mem_region_move()
  KVM: Fix out of range accesses to memslots
  KVM: X86: Micro-optimize IPI fastpath delay
  KVM: X86: Delay read msr data iff writes ICR MSR
  KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add a capability for enabling secure guests
  KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs
  KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow non-trapping WFI when using HW SGIs
  ...

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c
index 0db937497169..cc90b8b82329 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
  * Copyright 2017 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
  */
 
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
 #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
@@ -44,7 +46,18 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	u64 newmsr, bescr;
 	int ra, rs;
 
-	switch (instr & 0xfc0007ff) {
+	/*
+	 * rfid, rfebb, and mtmsrd encode bit 31 = 0 since it's a reserved bit
+	 * in these instructions, so masking bit 31 out doesn't change these
+	 * instructions. For treclaim., tsr., and trechkpt. instructions if bit
+	 * 31 = 0 then they are per ISA invalid forms, however P9 UM, in section
+	 * 4.6.10 Book II Invalid Forms, informs specifically that ignoring bit
+	 * 31 is an acceptable way to handle these invalid forms that have
+	 * bit 31 = 0. Moreover, for emulation purposes both forms (w/ and wo/
+	 * bit 31 set) can generate a softpatch interrupt. Hence both forms
+	 * are handled below for these instructions so they behave the same way.
+	 */
+	switch (instr & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK) {
 	case PPC_INST_RFID:
 		/* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */
 		newmsr = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr1;
@@ -105,7 +118,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr;
 		return RESUME_GUEST;
 
-	case PPC_INST_TSR:
+	/* ignore bit 31, see comment above */
+	case (PPC_INST_TSR & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK):
 		/* check for PR=1 and arch 2.06 bit set in PCR */
 		if ((msr & MSR_PR) && (vcpu->arch.vcore->pcr & PCR_ARCH_206)) {
 			/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
@@ -140,7 +154,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr;
 		return RESUME_GUEST;
 
-	case PPC_INST_TRECLAIM:
+	/* ignore bit 31, see comment above */
+	case (PPC_INST_TRECLAIM & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK):
 		/* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */
 		if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) {
 			/* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */
@@ -176,7 +191,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.shregs.msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK;
 		return RESUME_GUEST;
 
-	case PPC_INST_TRECHKPT:
+	/* ignore bit 31, see comment above */
+	case (PPC_INST_TRECHKPT & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK):
 		/* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */
 		/* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */
 		if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) {
@@ -208,6 +224,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 
 	/* What should we do here? We didn't recognize the instruction */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+	kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
+	pr_warn_ratelimited("Unrecognized TM-related instruction %#x for emulation", instr);
+
 	return RESUME_GUEST;
 }