diff options
author | Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com> | 2016-02-16 11:45:33 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2016-02-20 00:15:52 -0500 |
commit | 7ae8fd0351f912b075149a1e03a017be8b903b9a (patch) | |
tree | 27f04af171e1ad217868cbc7b3a433655ed7fe3d /crypto/sha512_generic.c | |
parent | 0bacbe528e26422e424d110ebda4ec68ea0fd5eb (diff) |
fs/pnode.c: treat zero mnt_group_id-s as unequal
propagate_one(m) calculates "type" argument for copy_tree() like this:
> if (m->mnt_group_id == last_dest->mnt_group_id) {
> type = CL_MAKE_SHARED;
> } else {
> type = CL_SLAVE;
> if (IS_MNT_SHARED(m))
> type |= CL_MAKE_SHARED;
> }
The "type" argument then governs clone_mnt() behavior with respect to flags
and mnt_master of new mount. When we iterate through a slave group, it is
possible that both current "m" and "last_dest" are not shared (although,
both are slaves, i.e. have non-NULL mnt_master-s). Then the comparison
above erroneously makes new mount shared and sets its mnt_master to
last_source->mnt_master. The patch fixes the problem by handling zero
mnt_group_id-s as though they are unequal.
The similar problem exists in the implementation of "else" clause above
when we have to ascend upward in the master/slave tree by calling:
> last_source = last_source->mnt_master;
> last_dest = last_source->mnt_parent;
proper number of times. The last step is governed by
"n->mnt_group_id != last_dest->mnt_group_id" condition that may lie if
both are zero. The patch fixes this case in the same way as the former one.
[AV: don't open-code an obvious helper...]
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/sha512_generic.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions