clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 02fef6830e72..394e417414d3 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -562,12 +562,12 @@ static u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem(void)
  */
 u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
 
-static cycle_t arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
 	return arch_timer_read_counter();
 }
 
-static cycle_t arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
+static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
 {
 	return arch_timer_read_counter();
 }