habanalabs: never copy_from_user inside spinlock

copy_from_user might sleep so we can never call it when we have
a spinlock.

Moreover, it is not necessary in waiting for user interrupt, because
if multiple threads will call this function on the same interrupt,
each one will have it's own fence object inside the driver. The
user address might be the same, but it doesn't really matter to us,
as we only read from it.

Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/command_submission.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/command_submission.c
index a97bb27ebb90..7b0516cf808b 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/command_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/command_submission.c
@@ -2740,14 +2740,10 @@ static int _hl_interrupt_wait_ioctl(struct hl_device *hdev, struct hl_ctx *ctx,
 	else
 		interrupt = &hdev->user_interrupt[interrupt_offset];
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
-
-	if (copy_from_user(&completion_value, u64_to_user_ptr(user_address),
-									4)) {
-		dev_err(hdev->dev,
-			"Failed to copy completion value from user\n");
+	if (copy_from_user(&completion_value, u64_to_user_ptr(user_address), 4)) {
+		dev_err(hdev->dev, "Failed to copy completion value from user\n");
 		rc = -EFAULT;
-		goto unlock_and_free_fence;
+		goto free_fence;
 	}
 
 	if (completion_value >= target_value)
@@ -2756,42 +2752,35 @@ static int _hl_interrupt_wait_ioctl(struct hl_device *hdev, struct hl_ctx *ctx,
 		*status = CS_WAIT_STATUS_BUSY;
 
 	if (!timeout_us || (*status == CS_WAIT_STATUS_COMPLETED))
-		goto unlock_and_free_fence;
+		goto free_fence;
 
 	/* Add pending user interrupt to relevant list for the interrupt
 	 * handler to monitor
 	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
 	list_add_tail(&pend->wait_list_node, &interrupt->wait_list_head);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
 
 wait_again:
 	/* Wait for interrupt handler to signal completion */
-	completion_rc =
-		wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
-				&pend->fence.completion, timeout);
+	completion_rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&pend->fence.completion,
+										timeout);
 
 	/* If timeout did not expire we need to perform the comparison.
 	 * If comparison fails, keep waiting until timeout expires
 	 */
 	if (completion_rc > 0) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
-
-		if (copy_from_user(&completion_value,
-				u64_to_user_ptr(user_address), 4)) {
-
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
-
-			dev_err(hdev->dev,
-				"Failed to copy completion value from user\n");
+		if (copy_from_user(&completion_value, u64_to_user_ptr(user_address), 4)) {
+			dev_err(hdev->dev, "Failed to copy completion value from user\n");
 			rc = -EFAULT;
 
 			goto remove_pending_user_interrupt;
 		}
 
 		if (completion_value >= target_value) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
 			*status = CS_WAIT_STATUS_COMPLETED;
 		} else {
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
 			reinit_completion(&pend->fence.completion);
 			timeout = completion_rc;
 
@@ -2811,9 +2800,9 @@ wait_again:
 remove_pending_user_interrupt:
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
 	list_del(&pend->wait_list_node);
-
-unlock_and_free_fence:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&interrupt->wait_list_lock, flags);
+
+free_fence:
 	kfree(pend);
 	hl_ctx_put(ctx);