diff options
author | Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> | 2023-12-13 23:17:17 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> | 2023-12-13 23:17:17 -0500 |
commit | 6df14a32e935bf40f4e4916ff38202c111c79862 (patch) | |
tree | d49ffe86cc375ad741225f724fbe645788aaa737 /include/ufs | |
parent | ae6fd54e605761259d13b4abbee5557f096b0413 (diff) | |
parent | 838f595a567257e3ac0ac33cdb6bb644ca326cc1 (diff) |
Merge patch series "Add UFS RTC support"
Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de> says:
Adding RTC support for embedded storage device UFS in its driver, it
is important for a few key reasons:
1. Helps with Regular Maintenance:
The RTC provides a basic way to keep track of time, making it useful for
scheduling routine maintenance tasks in the storage device. This includes
things like making sure data is spread
evenly across the storage to extend its life.
2. Figuring Out How Old Data Is:
The RTC helps the device estimate how long ago certain parts of the storage
were last used. This is handy for deciding when to do maintenance tasks to
keep the storage working well over time.
3. Making Devices Last Longer:
By using the RTC for regular upkeep, we can make sure the storage device lasts
longer and stays reliable. This is especially important for devices that need
to work well for a long time.
4.Fitting In with Other Devices:
The inclusion of RTC support aligns with existing UFS specifications (starting
from UFS Spec 2.0) and is consistent with the prevalent industry practice. Many
UFS devices currently on the market utilize RTC for internal timekeeping. By
ensuring compatibility with this widely adopted standard, the embedded storage
device becomes seamlessly integrable with existing hardware and software
ecosystems, reducing the risk of compatibility issues.
In short, adding RTC support to embedded storage device UFS helps with regular
upkeep, extends the device's life, ensures compatibility, and keeps everything
running smoothly with the rest of the system.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212220825.85255-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/ufs')
-rw-r--r-- | include/ufs/ufs.h | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 4 |
2 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/ufs/ufs.h b/include/ufs/ufs.h index e77ab1786856..b6003749bc83 100644 --- a/include/ufs/ufs.h +++ b/include/ufs/ufs.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> /* * Using static_assert() is not allowed in UAPI header files. Hence the check @@ -551,6 +552,14 @@ struct ufs_vreg_info { struct ufs_vreg *vdd_hba; }; +/* UFS device descriptor wPeriodicRTCUpdate bit9 defines RTC time baseline */ +#define UFS_RTC_TIME_BASELINE BIT(9) + +enum ufs_rtc_time { + UFS_RTC_RELATIVE, + UFS_RTC_ABSOLUTE +}; + struct ufs_dev_info { bool f_power_on_wp_en; /* Keeps information if any of the LU is power on write protected */ @@ -578,6 +587,11 @@ struct ufs_dev_info { /* UFS EXT_IID Enable */ bool b_ext_iid_en; + + /* UFS RTC */ + enum ufs_rtc_time rtc_type; + time64_t rtc_time_baseline; + u32 rtc_update_period; }; /* diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h index d24af0d46253..38637bea9a52 100644 --- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -912,6 +912,8 @@ enum ufshcd_mcq_opr { * @mcq_base: Multi circular queue registers base address * @uhq: array of supported hardware queues * @dev_cmd_queue: Queue for issuing device management commands + * @mcq_opr: MCQ operation and runtime registers + * @ufs_rtc_update_work: A work for UFS RTC periodic update */ struct ufs_hba { void __iomem *mmio_base; @@ -1076,6 +1078,8 @@ struct ufs_hba { struct ufs_hw_queue *uhq; struct ufs_hw_queue *dev_cmd_queue; struct ufshcd_mcq_opr_info_t mcq_opr[OPR_MAX]; + + struct delayed_work ufs_rtc_update_work; }; /** |