bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program

Previous patch adds 1:1 mapping between all 211 LSM hooks
and bpf_cgroup program array. Instead of reserving a slot per
possible hook, reserve 10 slots per cgroup for lsm programs.
Those slots are dynamically allocated on demand and reclaimed.

struct cgroup_bpf {
	struct bpf_prog_array *    effective[33];        /*     0   264 */
	/* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
	struct hlist_head          progs[33];            /*   264   264 */
	/* --- cacheline 8 boundary (512 bytes) was 16 bytes ago --- */
	u8                         flags[33];            /*   528    33 */

	/* XXX 7 bytes hole, try to pack */

	struct list_head           storages;             /*   568    16 */
	/* --- cacheline 9 boundary (576 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
	struct bpf_prog_array *    inactive;             /*   584     8 */
	struct percpu_ref          refcnt;               /*   592    16 */
	struct work_struct         release_work;         /*   608    72 */

	/* size: 680, cachelines: 11, members: 7 */
	/* sum members: 673, holes: 1, sum holes: 7 */
	/* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
};

Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628174314.1216643-5-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index 9cf41dd4f96f..169cbd0de797 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -127,12 +127,57 @@ unsigned int __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_current(const void *ctx,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
+struct cgroup_lsm_atype {
+	u32 attach_btf_id;
+	int refcnt;
+};
+
+static struct cgroup_lsm_atype cgroup_lsm_atype[CGROUP_LSM_NUM];
+
 static enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type
 bpf_cgroup_atype_find(enum bpf_attach_type attach_type, u32 attach_btf_id)
 {
+	int i;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
+
 	if (attach_type != BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
 		return to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(attach_type);
-	return CGROUP_LSM_START + bpf_lsm_hook_idx(attach_btf_id);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cgroup_lsm_atype); i++)
+		if (cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id == attach_btf_id)
+			return CGROUP_LSM_START + i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cgroup_lsm_atype); i++)
+		if (cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id == 0)
+			return CGROUP_LSM_START + i;
+
+	return -E2BIG;
+
+}
+
+void bpf_cgroup_atype_get(u32 attach_btf_id, int cgroup_atype)
+{
+	int i = cgroup_atype - CGROUP_LSM_START;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id &&
+		     cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id != attach_btf_id);
+
+	cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id;
+	cgroup_lsm_atype[i].refcnt++;
+}
+
+void bpf_cgroup_atype_put(int cgroup_atype)
+{
+	int i = cgroup_atype - CGROUP_LSM_START;
+
+	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
+	if (--cgroup_lsm_atype[i].refcnt <= 0)
+		cgroup_lsm_atype[i].attach_btf_id = 0;
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cgroup_lsm_atype[i].refcnt < 0);
+	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 }
 #else
 static enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type