diff options
| author | Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> | 2009-09-22 16:43:36 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-09-23 07:39:28 -0700 |
| commit | c02e3f361c75da04ca3025b4d19e947e9cc62ed3 (patch) | |
| tree | 92605809366dda20430fa9dc7d0b9b9f2f3c0bd9 /kernel/kmod.c | |
| parent | 1fd7317d02ec03c6fdf072317841287933d06d24 (diff) | |
kmod: fix race in usermodehelper code
The user mode helper code has a race in it. call_usermodehelper_exec()
takes an allocated subprocess_info structure, which it passes to a
workqueue, and then passes it to a kernel thread which it creates, after
which it calls complete to signal to the caller of
call_usermodehelper_exec() that it can free the subprocess_info struct.
But since we use that structure in the created thread, we can't call
complete from __call_usermodehelper(), which is where we create the kernel
thread. We need to call complete() from within the kernel thread and then
not use subprocess_info afterward in the case of UMH_WAIT_EXEC. Tested
successfully by me.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/kmod.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/kmod.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index 9fcb53a11f87..689d20f39305 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct subprocess_info { static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data) { struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data; + enum umh_wait wait = sub_info->wait; int retval; BUG_ON(atomic_read(&sub_info->cred->usage) != 1); @@ -184,10 +185,14 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data) */ set_user_nice(current, 0); + if (wait == UMH_WAIT_EXEC) + complete(sub_info->complete); + retval = kernel_execve(sub_info->path, sub_info->argv, sub_info->envp); /* Exec failed? */ - sub_info->retval = retval; + if (wait != UMH_WAIT_EXEC) + sub_info->retval = retval; do_exit(0); } @@ -266,16 +271,14 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct work_struct *work) switch (wait) { case UMH_NO_WAIT: + case UMH_WAIT_EXEC: break; case UMH_WAIT_PROC: if (pid > 0) break; sub_info->retval = pid; - /* FALLTHROUGH */ - - case UMH_WAIT_EXEC: - complete(sub_info->complete); + break; } } |