locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs

Currently, we have two different implementation of rwsem:

 1) CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK (rwsem-spinlock.c)
 2) CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM (rwsem-xadd.c)

As we are going to use a single generic implementation for rwsem-xadd.c
and no architecture-specific code will be needed, there is no point
in keeping two different implementations of rwsem. In most cases, the
performance of rwsem-spinlock.c will be worse. It also doesn't get all
the performance tuning and optimizations that had been implemented in
rwsem-xadd.c over the years.

For simplication, we are going to remove rwsem-spinlock.c and make all
architectures use a single implementation of rwsem - rwsem-xadd.c.

All references to RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK and RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
in the code are removed.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org
Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190322143008.21313-3-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

3 files changed, 1 insertions, 345 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/Makefile b/kernel/locking/Makefile
index 392c7f23af76..1af83e9ce57d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # and is generally not a function of system call inputs.
 KCOV_INSTRUMENT		:= n
 
-obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o percpu-rwsem.o
+obj-y += mutex.o semaphore.o rwsem.o percpu-rwsem.o rwsem-xadd.o
 
 ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_lockdep.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock_debug.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem-xadd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS) += qrwlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST) += locktorture.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST) += test-ww_mutex.o
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a7ffb2a96ede..000000000000
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,339 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* rwsem-spinlock.c: R/W semaphores: contention handling functions for
- * generic spinlock implementation
- *
- * Copyright (c) 2001   David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com).
- * - Derived partially from idea by Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- * - Derived also from comments by Linus
- */
-#include <linux/rwsem.h>
-#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
-#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
-#include <linux/export.h>
-
-enum rwsem_waiter_type {
-	RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE,
-	RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
-};
-
-struct rwsem_waiter {
-	struct list_head list;
-	struct task_struct *task;
-	enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
-};
-
-int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	int ret = 1;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) {
-		ret = (sem->count != 0);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_is_locked);
-
-/*
- * initialise the semaphore
- */
-void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
-		  struct lock_class_key *key)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held semaphore:
-	 */
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem));
-	lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0);
-#endif
-	sem->count = 0;
-	raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_rwsem);
-
-/*
- * handle the lock release when processes blocked on it that can now run
- * - if we come here, then:
- *   - the 'active count' _reached_ zero
- *   - the 'waiting count' is non-zero
- * - the spinlock must be held by the caller
- * - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having task zeroed
- * - writers are only woken if wakewrite is non-zero
- */
-static inline struct rw_semaphore *
-__rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
-{
-	struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
-	struct task_struct *tsk;
-	int woken;
-
-	waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
-
-	if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
-		if (wakewrite)
-			/* Wake up a writer. Note that we do not grant it the
-			 * lock - it will have to acquire it when it runs. */
-			wake_up_process(waiter->task);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* grant an infinite number of read locks to the front of the queue */
-	woken = 0;
-	do {
-		struct list_head *next = waiter->list.next;
-
-		list_del(&waiter->list);
-		tsk = waiter->task;
-		/*
-		 * Make sure we do not wakeup the next reader before
-		 * setting the nil condition to grant the next reader;
-		 * otherwise we could miss the wakeup on the other
-		 * side and end up sleeping again. See the pairing
-		 * in rwsem_down_read_failed().
-		 */
-		smp_mb();
-		waiter->task = NULL;
-		wake_up_process(tsk);
-		put_task_struct(tsk);
-		woken++;
-		if (next == &sem->wait_list)
-			break;
-		waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
-	} while (waiter->type != RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE);
-
-	sem->count += woken;
-
- out:
-	return sem;
-}
-
-/*
- * wake a single writer
- */
-static inline struct rw_semaphore *
-__rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
-
-	waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
-	wake_up_process(waiter->task);
-
-	return sem;
-}
-
-/*
- * get a read lock on the semaphore
- */
-int __sched __down_read_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
-{
-	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (sem->count >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
-		/* granted */
-		sem->count++;
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
-	waiter.task = current;
-	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
-	get_task_struct(current);
-
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
-	/* wait to be given the lock */
-	for (;;) {
-		if (!waiter.task)
-			break;
-		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
-			goto out_nolock;
-		set_current_state(state);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-		schedule();
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
- out:
-	return 0;
-
-out_nolock:
-	/*
-	 * We didn't take the lock, so that there is a writer, which
-	 * is owner or the first waiter of the sem. If it's a waiter,
-	 * it will be woken by current owner. Not need to wake anybody.
-	 */
-	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-	return -EINTR;
-}
-
-void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	__down_read_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-}
-
-int __sched __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return __down_read_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
-}
-
-/*
- * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
- */
-int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (sem->count >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
-		/* granted */
-		sem->count++;
-		ret = 1;
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * get a write lock on the semaphore
- */
-int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
-{
-	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
-	waiter.task = current;
-	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
-	/* wait for someone to release the lock */
-	for (;;) {
-		/*
-		 * That is the key to support write lock stealing: allows the
-		 * task already on CPU to get the lock soon rather than put
-		 * itself into sleep and waiting for system woke it or someone
-		 * else in the head of the wait list up.
-		 */
-		if (sem->count == 0)
-			break;
-		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
-			goto out_nolock;
-
-		set_current_state(state);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-		schedule();
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-	}
-	/* got the lock */
-	sem->count = -1;
-	list_del(&waiter.list);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	return ret;
-
-out_nolock:
-	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list) && sem->count >= 0)
-		__rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	return -EINTR;
-}
-
-void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	__down_write_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-}
-
-int __sched __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return __down_write_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
-}
-
-/*
- * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
- */
-int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (sem->count == 0) {
-		/* got the lock */
-		sem->count = -1;
-		ret = 1;
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * release a read lock on the semaphore
- */
-void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (--sem->count == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		sem = __rwsem_wake_one_writer(sem);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
- * release a write lock on the semaphore
- */
-void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	sem->count = 0;
-	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade a write lock into a read lock
- * - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue
- */
-void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	sem->count = 1;
-	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-}
-
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
index 067e265fa5c1..45ee00236e03 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
@@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ static inline void rwsem_clear_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
 /*
  * lock for reading
  */
@@ -260,5 +259,3 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	if (tmp < 0)
 		rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
 }
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM */