diff options
author | Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com> | 2022-07-05 12:09:51 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> | 2022-08-31 05:03:14 -0700 |
commit | fcb42c9a77d490ed0974e4d394519481aa06e585 (patch) | |
tree | f74e123488fd21675baa3673b32529c79a6ae09f /kernel/rcu/tiny.c | |
parent | bca4fa8cb0f4c096b515952f64e560fd784a0514 (diff) |
rcu: Add QS check in rcu_exp_handler() for non-preemptible kernels
Kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n and CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y maintain
preempt_count() state. Because such kernels map __rcu_read_lock()
and __rcu_read_unlock() to preempt_disable() and preempt_enable(),
respectively, this allows the expedited grace period's !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
version of the rcu_exp_handler() IPI handler function to use
preempt_count() to detect quiescent states.
This preempt_count() usage might seem to risk failures due to
use of implicit RCU readers in portions of the kernel under #ifndef
CONFIG_PREEMPTION, except that rcu_core() already disallows such implicit
RCU readers. The moral of this story is that you must use explicit
read-side markings such as rcu_read_lock() or preempt_disable() even if
the code knows that this kernel does not support preemption.
This commit therefore adds a preempt_count()-based check for a quiescent
state in the !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU version of the rcu_exp_handler()
function for kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y, reporting an
immediate quiescent state when the interrupted code had both preemption
and softirqs enabled.
This change results in about a 2% reduction in expedited grace-period
latency in kernels built with both CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n and
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220622103549.2840087-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu/tiny.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions