diff options
| author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2023-08-07 15:57:23 -1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2023-08-07 15:57:23 -1000 |
| commit | af73f5c9febe5095ee492ae43e9898fca65ced70 (patch) | |
| tree | 6c7a6d77b9fdcf449960a8d07cd56ac6e485c961 /kernel/workqueue.c | |
| parent | 636b927eba5bc633753f8eb80f35e1d5be806e51 (diff) | |
workqueue: Rename workqueue_attrs->no_numa to ->ordered
With the recent removal of NUMA related module param and sysfs knob,
workqueue_attrs->no_numa is now only used to implement ordered workqueues.
Let's rename the field so that it's less confusing especially with the
planned CPU affinity awareness improvements.
Just a rename. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 48208888aee0..82413df1c120 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3672,10 +3672,10 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to, cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask); /* * Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore - * ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead, - * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying. + * ->ordered as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead, + * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->ordered after copying. */ - to->no_numa = from->no_numa; + to->ordered = from->ordered; } /* hash value of the content of @attr */ @@ -3933,10 +3933,10 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs) pool->node = target_node; /* - * no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See + * ordered isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail. */ - pool->attrs->no_numa = false; + pool->attrs->ordered = false; if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0) goto fail; @@ -4141,7 +4141,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq, static void wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node, int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask) { - if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa) + if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->ordered) goto use_dfl; /* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */ @@ -4253,7 +4253,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq, goto out_free; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - if (new_attrs->no_numa) { + if (new_attrs->ordered) { ctx->dfl_pwq->refcnt++; ctx->pwq_tbl[cpu] = ctx->dfl_pwq; } else { @@ -4411,7 +4411,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex); if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) || - wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa) + wq->unbound_attrs->ordered) return; /* @@ -6358,11 +6358,10 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void) /* * An ordered wq should have only one pwq as ordering is * guaranteed by max_active which is enforced by pwqs. - * Turn off NUMA so that dfl_pwq is used for all nodes. */ BUG_ON(!(attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs())); attrs->nice = std_nice[i]; - attrs->no_numa = true; + attrs->ordered = true; ordered_wq_attrs[i] = attrs; } |