diff options
| author | Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> | 2024-05-27 13:20:07 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2024-05-27 19:33:40 +0200 |
| commit | 98e948fb60d41447fd8d2d0c3b8637fc6b6dc26d (patch) | |
| tree | a96449f76eff9a59365db5570758d363176cea30 /kernel | |
| parent | 95348e463eabc803341c67d562f9e0a5f0a48fe6 (diff) | |
bpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowed
We have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to
a tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete
on a sockmap/sockhash.
We don't intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the
existing verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash
to also cover deleting from a map.
From now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update
sockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.
Fixes: ff9105993240 ("bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Reported-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ec941d6e24f633a59172
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240527-sockmap-verify-deletes-v1-1-944b372f2101@cloudflare.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 77da1f438bec..48f3a9acdef3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -8882,7 +8882,8 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) enum bpf_attach_type eatype = env->prog->expected_attach_type; enum bpf_prog_type type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog); - if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem) + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem) return false; /* It's not possible to get access to a locked struct sock in these @@ -8893,6 +8894,11 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id) if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_ITER) return true; break; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS: + /* map_update allowed only via dedicated helpers with event type checks */ + if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem) + return true; + break; case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER: case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS: case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT: @@ -8988,7 +8994,6 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP: if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map && func_id != BPF_FUNC_sock_map_update && - func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem && func_id != BPF_FUNC_msg_redirect_map && func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_select_reuseport && func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem && @@ -8998,7 +9003,6 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH: if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_hash && func_id != BPF_FUNC_sock_hash_update && - func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem && func_id != BPF_FUNC_msg_redirect_hash && func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_select_reuseport && func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem && |