diff options
| author | Yafang shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> | 2024-12-05 10:11:00 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> | 2024-12-04 22:57:46 -0500 |
| commit | d9381508ea2b590aff46d28d432d20bfef1ba64c (patch) | |
| tree | 9abe132f832cb6515695b4a2294133965ee6f6c5 /kernel | |
| parent | 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37 (diff) | |
audit: workaround a GCC bug triggered by task comm changes
A build failure has been reported with the following details:
In file included from include/linux/string.h:390,
from include/linux/bitmap.h:13,
from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
from include/linux/smp.h:13,
from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:63,
from include/linux/wait.h:9,
from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from include/linux/fs.h:6,
from kernel/auditsc.c:37:
In function 'sized_strscpy',
inlined from '__audit_ptrace' at kernel/auditsc.c:2732:2:
>> include/linux/fortify-string.h:293:17:
error: call to '__write_overflow' declared with attribute error:
detected write beyond size of object (1st parameter)
293 | __write_overflow();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In function 'sized_strscpy',
inlined from 'audit_signal_info_syscall' at kernel/auditsc.c:2759:3:
>> include/linux/fortify-string.h:293:17:
error: call to '__write_overflow' declared with attribute error:
detected write beyond size of object (1st parameter)
293 | __write_overflow();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The issue appears to be a GCC bug, though the root cause remains
unclear at this time. For now, let's implement a workaround.
A bug report has also been filed with GCC [0].
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117912 [0]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171420.1V00ICVG-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241128182435.57a1ea6f@gandalf.local.home/
Reported-by: Zhuo, Qiuxu <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CY8PR11MB71348E568DBDA576F17DAFF389362@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
Originally-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/202410171059.C2C395030@keescook/
Signed-off-by: Yafang shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
[PM: subject tweak, description line wrapping]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/auditsc.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c index 279ba5c420a4..561d96affe9f 100644 --- a/kernel/auditsc.c +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c @@ -2728,8 +2728,8 @@ void __audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t) context->target_auid = audit_get_loginuid(t); context->target_uid = task_uid(t); context->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t); - security_task_getlsmprop_obj(t, &context->target_ref); strscpy(context->target_comm, t->comm); + security_task_getlsmprop_obj(t, &context->target_ref); } /** @@ -2755,8 +2755,8 @@ int audit_signal_info_syscall(struct task_struct *t) ctx->target_auid = audit_get_loginuid(t); ctx->target_uid = t_uid; ctx->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t); - security_task_getlsmprop_obj(t, &ctx->target_ref); strscpy(ctx->target_comm, t->comm); + security_task_getlsmprop_obj(t, &ctx->target_ref); return 0; } |