diff options
author | Markus Stockhausen <stockhausen@collogia.de> | 2014-12-15 12:57:04 +1100 |
---|---|---|
committer | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> | 2015-04-22 08:00:41 +1000 |
commit | fe5cbc6e06c7d8b3a86f6f5491d74766bb5c2827 (patch) | |
tree | e201265576408d2edc86ba6fc82b66ce0dfd9349 /lib/raid6/algos.c | |
parent | dabc4ec6ba72418ebca6bf1884f344bba40c8709 (diff) |
md/raid6 algorithms: delta syndrome functions
v3: s-o-b comment, explanation of performance and descision for
the start/stop implementation
Implementing rmw functionality for RAID6 requires optimized syndrome
calculation. Up to now we can only generate a complete syndrome. The
target P/Q pages are always overwritten. With this patch we provide
a framework for inplace P/Q modification. In the first place simply
fill those functions with NULL values.
xor_syndrome() has two additional parameters: start & stop. These
will indicate the first and last page that are changing during a
rmw run. That makes it possible to avoid several unneccessary loops
and speed up calculation. The caller needs to implement the following
logic to make the functions work.
1) xor_syndrome(disks, start, stop, ...): "Remove" all data of source
blocks inside P/Q between (and including) start and end.
2) modify any block with start <= block <= stop
3) xor_syndrome(disks, start, stop, ...): "Reinsert" all data of
source blocks into P/Q between (and including) start and end.
Pages between start and stop that won't be changed should be filled
with a pointer to the kernel zero page. The reasons for not taking NULL
pages are:
1) Algorithms cross the whole source data line by line. Thus avoid
additional branches.
2) Having a NULL page avoids calculating the XOR P parity but still
need calulation steps for the Q parity. Depending on the algorithm
unrolling that might be only a difference of 2 instructions per loop.
The benchmark numbers of the gen_syndrome() functions are displayed in
the kernel log. Do the same for the xor_syndrome() functions. This
will help to analyze performance problems and give an rough estimate
how well the algorithm works. The choice of the fastest algorithm will
still depend on the gen_syndrome() performance.
With the start/stop page implementation the speed can vary a lot in real
life. E.g. a change of page 0 & page 15 on a stripe will be harder to
compute than the case where page 0 & page 1 are XOR candidates. To be not
to enthusiatic about the expected speeds we will run a worse case test
that simulates a change on the upper half of the stripe. So we do:
1) calculation of P/Q for the upper pages
2) continuation of Q for the lower (empty) pages
Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <stockhausen@collogia.de>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/raid6/algos.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/raid6/algos.c | 41 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/lib/raid6/algos.c b/lib/raid6/algos.c index dbef2314901e..975c6e0434bd 100644 --- a/lib/raid6/algos.c +++ b/lib/raid6/algos.c @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ static inline const struct raid6_recov_calls *raid6_choose_recov(void) static inline const struct raid6_calls *raid6_choose_gen( void *(*const dptrs)[(65536/PAGE_SIZE)+2], const int disks) { - unsigned long perf, bestperf, j0, j1; + unsigned long perf, bestgenperf, bestxorperf, j0, j1; + int start = (disks>>1)-1, stop = disks-3; /* work on the second half of the disks */ const struct raid6_calls *const *algo; const struct raid6_calls *best; - for (bestperf = 0, best = NULL, algo = raid6_algos; *algo; algo++) { + for (bestgenperf = 0, bestxorperf = 0, best = NULL, algo = raid6_algos; *algo; algo++) { if (!best || (*algo)->prefer >= best->prefer) { if ((*algo)->valid && !(*algo)->valid()) continue; @@ -153,19 +154,45 @@ static inline const struct raid6_calls *raid6_choose_gen( } preempt_enable(); - if (perf > bestperf) { - bestperf = perf; + if (perf > bestgenperf) { + bestgenperf = perf; best = *algo; } - pr_info("raid6: %-8s %5ld MB/s\n", (*algo)->name, + pr_info("raid6: %-8s gen() %5ld MB/s\n", (*algo)->name, (perf*HZ) >> (20-16+RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2)); + + if (!(*algo)->xor_syndrome) + continue; + + perf = 0; + + preempt_disable(); + j0 = jiffies; + while ((j1 = jiffies) == j0) + cpu_relax(); + while (time_before(jiffies, + j1 + (1<<RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + (*algo)->xor_syndrome(disks, start, stop, + PAGE_SIZE, *dptrs); + perf++; + } + preempt_enable(); + + if (best == *algo) + bestxorperf = perf; + + pr_info("raid6: %-8s xor() %5ld MB/s\n", (*algo)->name, + (perf*HZ) >> (20-16+RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2+1)); } } if (best) { - pr_info("raid6: using algorithm %s (%ld MB/s)\n", + pr_info("raid6: using algorithm %s gen() %ld MB/s\n", best->name, - (bestperf*HZ) >> (20-16+RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2)); + (bestgenperf*HZ) >> (20-16+RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2)); + if (best->xor_syndrome) + pr_info("raid6: .... xor() %ld MB/s, rmw enabled\n", + (bestxorperf*HZ) >> (20-16+RAID6_TIME_JIFFIES_LG2+1)); raid6_call = *best; } else pr_err("raid6: Yikes! No algorithm found!\n"); |