diff options
| author | SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> | 2024-10-31 11:37:57 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-11-07 14:14:58 -0800 |
| commit | 8e7bde615f634a82a44b1f3d293c049fd3ef9ca9 (patch) | |
| tree | 2a8d7ef5d940c86a162cc2f580264256a73b28af /mm/damon | |
| parent | 3488af0970445ff5532c7e8dc5e6456b877aee5e (diff) | |
mm/damon/core: handle zero schemes apply interval
DAMON's logics to determine if this is the time to apply damos schemes
assumes next_apply_sis is always set larger than current
passed_sample_intervals. And therefore assume continuously incrementing
passed_sample_intervals will make it reaches to the next_apply_sis in
future. The logic hence does apply the scheme and update next_apply_sis
only if passed_sample_intervals is same to next_apply_sis.
If Schemes apply interval is set as zero, however, next_apply_sis is set
same to current passed_sample_intervals, respectively. And
passed_sample_intervals is incremented before doing the next_apply_sis
check. Hence, next_apply_sis becomes larger than next_apply_sis, and the
logic says it is not the time to apply schemes and update next_apply_sis.
In other words, DAMON stops applying schemes until passed_sample_intervals
overflows.
Based on the documents and the common sense, a reasonable behavior for
such inputs would be applying the schemes for every sampling interval.
Handle the case by removing the assumption.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031183757.49610-3-sj@kernel.org
Fixes: 42f994b71404 ("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [6.7.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/damon')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/damon/core.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c index 3131a07569e4..ce700e694b63 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core.c +++ b/mm/damon/core.c @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c, damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota; - if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis) + if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) continue; if (!s->wmarks.activated) @@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) bool has_schemes_to_apply = false; damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { - if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis) + if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) continue; if (!s->wmarks.activated) @@ -1642,9 +1642,9 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) } damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { - if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis) + if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) continue; - s->next_apply_sis += + s->next_apply_sis = c->passed_sample_intervals + (s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us : c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval; } |