diff options
| author | T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> | 2024-02-02 23:38:54 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-02-22 10:24:52 -0800 |
| commit | 287d5fedb377ddc232b216b882723305b27ae31a (patch) | |
| tree | 4951a331573d590fe5d8727956c3881fff04704d /mm/memcontrol.c | |
| parent | 2c8b947416a9120d50fd165738de38400f9a0933 (diff) | |
mm: memcg: use larger batches for proactive reclaim
Before 388536ac291 ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive
reclaim") we passed the number of pages for the reclaim request directly
to try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages, which could lead to significant
overreclaim. After 0388536ac291 the number of pages was limited to a
maximum 32 (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) to reduce the amount of overreclaim.
However such a small batch size caused a regression in reclaim performance
due to many more reclaim start/stop cycles inside memory_reclaim. The
restart cost is amortized over more pages with larger batch sizes, and
becomes a significant component of the runtime if the batch size is too
small.
Reclaim tries to balance nr_to_reclaim fidelity with fairness across nodes
and cgroups over which the pages are spread. As such, the bigger the
request, the bigger the absolute overreclaim error. Historic in-kernel
users of reclaim have used fixed, small sized requests to approach an
appropriate reclaim rate over time. When we reclaim a user request of
arbitrary size, use decaying batch sizes to manage error while maintaining
reasonable throughput.
MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU used
root - full reclaim pages/sec time (sec)
pre-0388536ac291 : 68047 10.46
post-0388536ac291 : 13742 inf
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 67352 10.51
MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU not used
/uid_0 - 1G reclaim pages/sec time (sec) overreclaim (MiB)
pre-0388536ac291 : 258822 1.12 107.8
post-0388536ac291 : 105174 2.49 3.5
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 233396 1.12 -7.4
MGLRU enabled - memcg LRU not used
/uid_0 - full reclaim pages/sec time (sec)
pre-0388536ac291 : 72334 7.09
post-0388536ac291 : 38105 14.45
(reclaim-reclaimed)/4 : 72914 6.96
[tjmercier@google.com: v4]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240206175251.3364296-1-tjmercier@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202233855.1236422-1-tjmercier@google.com
Fixes: 0388536ac291 ("mm:vmscan: fix inaccurate reclaim during proactive reclaim")
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Efly Young <yangyifei03@kuaishou.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 484a9d2862d4..cb216d30a221 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -6981,6 +6981,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE; while (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim) { + /* Will converge on zero, but reclaim enforces a minimum */ + unsigned long batch_size = (nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed) / 4; unsigned long reclaimed; if (signal_pending(current)) @@ -6995,8 +6997,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_reclaim(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, lru_add_drain_all(); reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, - min(nr_to_reclaim - nr_reclaimed, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX), - GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options); + batch_size, GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options); if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--) return -EAGAIN; |