summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/core/fib_rules.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>2018-06-29 14:32:15 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2018-06-30 22:11:13 +0900
commit35e8c7ba0863acadd4b9badd09740af7a8331125 (patch)
tree4f64022fc3ee35c5eb4e94ccabccc31c247e700a /net/core/fib_rules.c
parent3ffe64f1a641b80a82d9ef4efa7a05ce69049871 (diff)
net: fib_rules: bring back rule_exists to match rule during add
After commit f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule delrule msgs into fib_nl2rule"), rule_exists got replaced by rule_find for existing rule lookup in both the add and del paths. While this is good for the delete path, it solves a few problems but opens up a few invalid key matches in the add path. $ip -4 rule add table main tos 10 fwmark 1 $ip -4 rule add table main tos 10 RTNETLINK answers: File exists The problem here is rule_find does not check if the key masks in the new and old rule are the same and hence ends up matching a more secific rule. Rule key masks cannot be easily compared today without an elaborate if-else block. Its best to introduce key masks for easier and accurate rule comparison in the future. Until then, due to fear of regressions this patch re-introduces older loose rule_exists during add. Also fixes both rule_exists and rule_find to cover missing attributes. Fixes: f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule delrule msgs into fib_nl2rule") Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/fib_rules.c')
-rw-r--r--net/core/fib_rules.c72
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/fib_rules.c b/net/core/fib_rules.c
index bc8425d81022..f64aa13811ea 100644
--- a/net/core/fib_rules.c
+++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c
@@ -444,6 +444,9 @@ static struct fib_rule *rule_find(struct fib_rules_ops *ops,
if (rule->ip_proto && r->ip_proto != rule->ip_proto)
continue;
+ if (rule->proto && r->proto != rule->proto)
+ continue;
+
if (fib_rule_port_range_set(&rule->sport_range) &&
!fib_rule_port_range_compare(&r->sport_range,
&rule->sport_range))
@@ -653,6 +656,73 @@ errout:
return err;
}
+static int rule_exists(struct fib_rules_ops *ops, struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
+ struct nlattr **tb, struct fib_rule *rule)
+{
+ struct fib_rule *r;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(r, &ops->rules_list, list) {
+ if (r->action != rule->action)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->table != rule->table)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->pref != rule->pref)
+ continue;
+
+ if (memcmp(r->iifname, rule->iifname, IFNAMSIZ))
+ continue;
+
+ if (memcmp(r->oifname, rule->oifname, IFNAMSIZ))
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->mark != rule->mark)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->suppress_ifgroup != rule->suppress_ifgroup)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->suppress_prefixlen != rule->suppress_prefixlen)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->mark_mask != rule->mark_mask)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->tun_id != rule->tun_id)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->fr_net != rule->fr_net)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->l3mdev != rule->l3mdev)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!uid_eq(r->uid_range.start, rule->uid_range.start) ||
+ !uid_eq(r->uid_range.end, rule->uid_range.end))
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->ip_proto != rule->ip_proto)
+ continue;
+
+ if (r->proto != rule->proto)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!fib_rule_port_range_compare(&r->sport_range,
+ &rule->sport_range))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!fib_rule_port_range_compare(&r->dport_range,
+ &rule->dport_range))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!ops->compare(r, frh, tb))
+ continue;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
@@ -687,7 +757,7 @@ int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
goto errout;
if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) &&
- rule_find(ops, frh, tb, rule, user_priority)) {
+ rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) {
err = -EEXIST;
goto errout_free;
}