diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 59 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5dd1dcb902bf..2ce967a63ede 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static bool register_is_null(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) */ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *state, /* func where register points to */ - int off, int size, int value_regno) + int off, int size, int value_regno, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_func_state *cur; /* state of the current function */ int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; @@ -1017,8 +1017,33 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = cur->regs[value_regno]; state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; - for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] == STACK_MISC && + !env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + int *poff = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].sanitize_stack_off; + int soff = (-spi - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE; + + /* detected reuse of integer stack slot with a pointer + * which means either llvm is reusing stack slot or + * an attacker is trying to exploit CVE-2018-3639 + * (speculative store bypass) + * Have to sanitize that slot with preemptive + * store of zero. + */ + if (*poff && *poff != soff) { + /* disallow programs where single insn stores + * into two different stack slots, since verifier + * cannot sanitize them + */ + verbose(env, + "insn %d cannot access two stack slots fp%d and fp%d", + insn_idx, *poff, soff); + return -EINVAL; + } + *poff = soff; + } state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_SPILL; + } } else { u8 type = STACK_MISC; @@ -1694,7 +1719,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn if (t == BPF_WRITE) err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, - value_regno); + value_regno, insn_idx); else err = check_stack_read(env, state, off, size, value_regno); @@ -5169,6 +5194,34 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) else continue; + if (type == BPF_WRITE && + env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].sanitize_stack_off) { + struct bpf_insn patch[] = { + /* Sanitize suspicious stack slot with zero. + * There are no memory dependencies for this store, + * since it's only using frame pointer and immediate + * constant of zero + */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, + env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].sanitize_stack_off, + 0), + /* the original STX instruction will immediately + * overwrite the same stack slot with appropriate value + */ + *insn, + }; + + cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(patch); + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, patch, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } + if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX) continue; |