summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-10-21x86/fpu: Use fpstate in __copy_xstate_to_uabi_buf()Thomas Gleixner
With dynamically enabled features the copy function must know the features and the size which is valid for the task. Retrieve them from fpstate. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145323.181495492@linutronix.de
2021-10-21x86/fpu: Use fpstate in fpu_copy_kvm_uabi_to_fpstate()Thomas Gleixner
Straight forward conversion. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145323.129699950@linutronix.de
2021-10-21x86/fpu/xstate: Use fpstate for os_xsave()Thomas Gleixner
With variable feature sets XSAVE[S] requires to know the feature set for which the buffer is valid. Retrieve it from fpstate. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145323.025695590@linutronix.de
2021-10-21x86/fpu: Use fpstate::sizeThomas Gleixner
Make use of fpstate::size in various places which require the buffer size information for sanity checks or memcpy() sizing. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.973518954@linutronix.de
2021-10-21x86/fpu: Add size and mask information to fpstateThomas Gleixner
Add state size and feature mask information to the fpstate container. This will be used for runtime checks with the upcoming support for dynamically enabled features and dynamically sized buffers. That avoids conditionals all over the place as the required information is accessible for both default and extended buffers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.921388806@linutronix.de
2021-10-21x86/process: Move arch_thread_struct_whitelist() out of lineThomas Gleixner
In preparation for dynamically enabled FPU features move the function out of line as the goal is to expose less and not more information. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.869001791@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu/core: Convert to fpstateThomas Gleixner
Convert the rest of the core code to the new register storage mechanism in preparation for dynamically sized buffers. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.659456185@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Convert restore_fpregs_from_fpstate() to struct fpstateThomas Gleixner
Convert restore_fpregs_from_fpstate() and related code to the new register storage mechanism in preparation for dynamically sized buffers. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.347395546@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Convert fpstate_init() to struct fpstateThomas Gleixner
Convert fpstate_init() and related code to the new register storage mechanism in preparation for dynamically sized buffers. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.292157401@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Provide struct fpstateThomas Gleixner
New xfeatures will not longer be automatically stored in the regular XSAVE buffer in thread_struct::fpu. The kernel will provide the default sized buffer for storing the regular features up to AVX512 in thread_struct::fpu and if a task requests to use one of the new features then the register storage has to be extended. The state will be accessed via a pointer in thread_struct::fpu which defaults to the builtin storage and can be switched when extended storage is required. To avoid conditionals all over the code, create a new container for the register storage which will gain other information, e.g. size, feature masks etc., later. For now it just contains the register storage, which gives it exactly the same layout as the exiting fpu::state. Stick fpu::state and the new fpu::__fpstate into an anonymous union and initialize the pointer. Add build time checks to validate that both are at the same place and have the same size. This allows step by step conversion of all users. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013145322.234458659@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Replace KVMs home brewed FPU copy to userThomas Gleixner
Similar to the copy from user function the FPU core has this already implemented with all bells and whistles. Get rid of the duplicated code and use the core functionality. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.244101845@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Provide a proper function for ex_handler_fprestore()Thomas Gleixner
To make upcoming changes for support of dynamically enabled features simpler, provide a proper function for the exception handler which removes exposure of FPU internals. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011540.053515012@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Replace the includes of fpu/internal.hThomas Gleixner
Now that the file is empty, fixup all references with the proper includes and delete the former kitchen sink. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011540.001197214@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Move fpregs_restore_userregs() to coreThomas Gleixner
Only used internally in the FPU core code. While at it, convert to the percpu accessors which verify preemption is disabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.686806639@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Move legacy ASM wrappers to coreThomas Gleixner
Nothing outside the core code requires them. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.572439164@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Clean up CPU feature testsThomas Gleixner
Further disintegration of internal.h: Move the CPU feature tests to a core header and remove the unused one. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.401510559@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Move context switch and exit to user inlines into sched.hThomas Gleixner
internal.h is a kitchen sink which needs to get out of the way to prepare for the upcoming changes. Move the context switch and exit to user inlines into a separate header, which is all that code needs. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.349132461@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Replace KVMs home brewed FPU copy from userThomas Gleixner
Copying a user space buffer to the memory buffer is already available in the FPU core. The copy mechanism in KVM lacks sanity checks and needs to use cpuid() to lookup the offset of each component, while the FPU core has this information cached. Make the FPU core variant accessible for KVM and replace the home brewed mechanism. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.134065207@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Move KVMs FPU swapping to FPU coreThomas Gleixner
Swapping the host/guest FPU is directly fiddling with FPU internals which requires 5 exports. The upcoming support of dynamically enabled states would even need more. Implement a swap function in the FPU core code and export that instead. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011539.076072399@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Cleanup xstate xcomp_bv initializationThomas Gleixner
No point in having this duplicated all over the place with needlessly different defines. Provide a proper initialization function which initializes user buffers properly and make KVM use it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011538.897664678@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Do not inherit FPU context for kernel and IO worker threadsThomas Gleixner
There is no reason why kernel and IO worker threads need a full clone of the parent's FPU state. Both are kernel threads which are not supposed to use FPU. So copying a large state or doing XSAVE() is pointless. Just clean out the minimally required state for those tasks. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011538.839822981@linutronix.de
2021-10-20x86/fpu: Remove pointless memset in fpu_clone()Thomas Gleixner
Zeroing the forked task's FPU registers buffer to avoid leaking init optimized stale data into the clone is a pointless exercise for the case where the current task has TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD set. In that case, the FPU registers state is copied from current's FPU register buffer which can contain stale init optimized data as well. The alledged information leak is non-existant because this stale init optimized data is used nowhere and cannot leak anywhere. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211015011538.722854569@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Mark init_fpstate __ro_after_initThomas Gleixner
Nothing has to write into that state after init. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.992342060@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Don't store PKRU in xstate in fpu_reset_fpstate()Thomas Gleixner
PKRU for a task is stored in task->thread.pkru when the task is scheduled out. For 'current' the authoritative source of PKRU is the hardware. fpu_reset_fpstate() has two callers: 1) fpu__clear_user_states() for !FPU systems. For those PKRU is irrelevant 2) fpu_flush_thread() which is invoked from flush_thread(). flush_thread() resets the hardware to the kernel restrictive default value. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.802850233@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Dont restore PKRU in fpregs_restore_userspace()Thomas Gleixner
switch_to() and flush_thread() write the task's PKRU value eagerly so the PKRU value of current is always valid in the hardware. That means there is no point in restoring PKRU on exit to user or when reactivating the task's FPU registers in the signal frame setup path. This allows to remove all the xstate buffer updates with PKRU values once the PKRU state is stored in thread struct while a task is scheduled out. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.303919033@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename xfeatures_mask_user() to xfeatures_mask_uabi()Thomas Gleixner
Rename it so it's clear that this is about user ABI features which can differ from the feature set which the kernel saves and restores because the kernel handles e.g. PKRU differently. But the user ABI (ptrace, signal frame) expects it to be there. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.211585137@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Move FXSAVE_LEAK quirk info __copy_kernel_to_fpregs()Thomas Gleixner
copy_kernel_to_fpregs() restores all xfeatures but it is also the place where the AMD FXSAVE_LEAK bug is handled. That prevents fpregs_restore_userregs() to limit the restored features, which is required to untangle PKRU and XSTATE handling and also for the upcoming supervisor state management. Move the FXSAVE_LEAK quirk into __copy_kernel_to_fpregs() and deinline that function which has become rather fat. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.114271278@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename __fpregs_load_activate() to fpregs_restore_userregs()Thomas Gleixner
Rename it so that it becomes entirely clear what this function is about. It's purpose is to restore the FPU registers to the state which was saved in the task's FPU memory state either at context switch or by an in kernel FPU user. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.018867925@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Clean up the fpu__clear() variantsAndy Lutomirski
fpu__clear() currently resets both register state and kernel XSAVE buffer state. It has two modes: one for all state (supervisor and user) and another for user state only. fpu__clear_all() uses the "all state" (user_only=0) mode, while a number of signal paths use the user_only=1 mode. Make fpu__clear() work only for user state (user_only=1) and remove the "all state" (user_only=0) code. Rename it to match so it can be used by the signal paths. Replace the "all state" (user_only=0) fpu__clear() functionality. Use the TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD functionality instead of making any actual hardware registers changes in this path. Instead of invoking fpu__initialize() just memcpy() init_fpstate into the task's FPU state because that has already the correct format and in case of PKRU also contains the default PKRU value. Move the actual PKRU write out into flush_thread() where it belongs and where it will end up anyway when PKRU and XSTATE have been untangled. For bisectability a workaround is required which stores the PKRU value in the xstate memory until PKRU is untangled from XSTATE for context switching and return to user. [ Dave Hansen: Polished changelog ] [ tglx: Fixed the PKRU fallout ] Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.922729522@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename fpu__clear_all() to fpu_flush_thread()Thomas Gleixner
Make it clear what the function is about. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.827979263@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Use pkru_write_default() in copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs()Thomas Gleixner
There is no point in using copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs() which in turn calls write_pkru(). write_pkru() tries to fiddle with the task's xstate buffer for nothing because the XRSTOR[S](init_fpstate) just cleared the xfeature flag in the xstate header which makes get_xsave_addr() fail. It's a useless exercise anyway because the reinitialization activates the FPU so before the task's xstate buffer can be used again a XRSTOR[S] must happen which in turn dumps the PKRU value. Get rid of the now unused copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.732508792@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/cpu: Sanitize X86_FEATURE_OSPKEThomas Gleixner
X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is enabled first on the boot CPU and the feature flag is set. Secondary CPUs have to enable CR4.PKE as well and set their per CPU feature flag. That's ineffective because all call sites have checks for boot_cpu_data. Make it smarter and force the feature flag when PKU is enabled on the boot cpu which allows then to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) all over the place. That either compiles the code out when PKEY support is disabled in Kconfig or uses a static_cpu_has() for the feature check which makes a significant difference in hotpaths, e.g. context switch. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.305113644@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename and sanitize fpu__save/copy()Thomas Gleixner
Both function names are a misnomer. fpu__save() is actually about synchronizing the hardware register state into the task's memory state so that either coredump or a math exception handler can inspect the state at the time where the problem happens. The function guarantees to preserve the register state, while "save" is a common terminology for saving the current state so it can be modified and restored later. This is clearly not the case here. Rename it to fpu_sync_fpstate(). fpu__copy() is used to clone the current task's FPU state when duplicating task_struct. While the register state is a copy the rest of the FPU state is not. Name it accordingly and remove the really pointless @src argument along with the warning which comes along with it. Nothing can ever copy the FPU state of a non-current task. It's clearly just a consequence of arch_dup_task_struct(), but it makes no sense to proliferate that further. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.196727450@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename initstate copy functionsThomas Gleixner
Again this not a copy. It's restoring register state from kernel memory. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.816581630@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Get rid of the FNSAVE optimizationThomas Gleixner
The FNSAVE support requires conditionals in quite some call paths because FNSAVE reinitializes the FPU hardware. If the save has to preserve the FPU register state then the caller has to conditionally restore it from memory when FNSAVE is in use. This also requires a conditional in context switch because the restore avoidance optimization cannot work with FNSAVE. As this only affects 20+ years old CPUs there is really no reason to keep this optimization effective for FNSAVE. It's about time to not optimize for antiques anymore. Just unconditionally FRSTOR the save content to the registers and clean up the conditionals all over the place. Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.617369268@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() to save_fpregs_to_fpstate()Thomas Gleixner
A copy is guaranteed to leave the source intact, which is not the case when FNSAVE is used as that reinitilizes the registers. Save does not make such guarantees and it matches what this is about, i.e. to save the state for a later restore. Rename it to save_fpregs_to_fpstate(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.508853062@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename fregs-related copy functionsThomas Gleixner
The function names for fnsave/fnrstor operations are horribly named and a permanent source of confusion. Rename: copy_kernel_to_fregs() to frstor() copy_fregs_to_user() to fnsave_to_user_sigframe() copy_user_to_fregs() to frstor_from_user_sigframe() so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the documentation is just natural. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.223594101@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename fxregs-related copy functionsThomas Gleixner
The function names for fxsave/fxrstor operations are horribly named and a permanent source of confusion. Rename: copy_fxregs_to_kernel() to fxsave() copy_kernel_to_fxregs() to fxrstor() copy_fxregs_to_user() to fxsave_to_user_sigframe() copy_user_to_fxregs() to fxrstor_from_user_sigframe() so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the documentation is just natural. While at it, replace the static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FXSR) with use_fxsr() to be consistent with the rest of the code. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.017863494@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Rename copy_xregs_to_kernel() and copy_kernel_to_xregs()Thomas Gleixner
The function names for xsave[s]/xrstor[s] operations are horribly named and a permanent source of confusion. Rename: copy_xregs_to_kernel() to os_xsave() copy_kernel_to_xregs() to os_xrstor() These are truly low level wrappers around the actual instructions XSAVE[OPT]/XRSTOR and XSAVES/XRSTORS with the twist that the selection based on the available CPU features happens with an alternative to avoid conditionals all over the place and to provide the best performance for hot paths. The os_ prefix tells that this is the OS selected mechanism. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.830239347@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Move fpu__write_begin() to regsetThomas Gleixner
The only usecase for fpu__write_begin is the set() callback of regset, so the function is pointlessly global. Move it to the regset code and rename it to fpu_force_restore() which is exactly decribing what the function does. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.328652975@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu/regset: Move fpu__read_begin() into regsetThomas Gleixner
The function can only be used from the regset get() callbacks safely. So there is no reason to have it globally exposed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.234942936@linutronix.de
2021-06-23x86/fpu: Move inlines where they belongThomas Gleixner
They are only used in fpstate_init() and there is no point to have them in a header just to make reading the code harder. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121452.023118522@linutronix.de
2021-01-21x86/fpu: Add kernel_fpu_begin_mask() to selectively initialize stateAndy Lutomirski
Currently, requesting kernel FPU access doesn't distinguish which parts of the extended ("FPU") state are needed. This is nice for simplicity, but there are a few cases in which it's suboptimal: - The vast majority of in-kernel FPU users want XMM/YMM/ZMM state but do not use legacy 387 state. These users want MXCSR initialized but don't care about the FPU control word. Skipping FNINIT would save time. (Empirically, FNINIT is several times slower than LDMXCSR.) - Code that wants MMX doesn't want or need MXCSR initialized. _mmx_memcpy(), for example, can run before CR4.OSFXSR gets set, and initializing MXCSR will fail because LDMXCSR generates an #UD when the aforementioned CR4 bit is not set. - Any future in-kernel users of XFD (eXtended Feature Disable)-capable dynamic states will need special handling. Add a more specific API that allows callers to specify exactly what they want. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Olędzki <ole@ans.pl> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aff1cac8b8fc7ee900cf73e8f2369966621b053f.1611205691.git.luto@kernel.org
2020-07-28Merge tag 'v5.8-rc7' into perf/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-07-08x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction maskKan Liang
When saving xstate to a kernel/user XSAVE area with the XSAVE family of instructions, the current code applies the 'full' instruction mask (-1), which tries to XSAVE all possible features. This method relies on hardware to trim 'all possible' down to what is enabled in the hardware. The code works well for now. However, there will be a problem, if some features are enabled in hardware, but are not suitable to be saved into all kernel XSAVE buffers, like task->fpu, due to performance consideration. One such example is the Last Branch Records (LBR) state. The LBR state only contains valuable information when LBR is explicitly enabled by the perf subsystem, and the size of an LBR state is large (808 bytes for now). To avoid both CPU overhead and space overhead at each context switch, the LBR state should not be saved into task->fpu like other state components. It should be saved/restored on demand when LBR is enabled in the perf subsystem. Current copy_xregs_to_* will trigger a buffer overflow for such cases. Three sites use the '-1' instruction mask which must be updated. Two are saving/restoring the xstate to/from a kernel-allocated XSAVE buffer and can use 'xfeatures_mask_all', which will save/restore all of the features present in a normal task FPU buffer. The last one saves the register state directly to a user buffer. It could also use 'xfeatures_mask_all'. Just as it was with the '-1' argument, any supervisor states in the mask will be filtered out by the hardware and not saved to the buffer. But, to be more explicit about what is expected to be saved, use xfeatures_mask_user() for the instruction mask. KVM includes the header file fpu/internal.h. To avoid 'undefined xfeatures_mask_all' compiling issue, move copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() to fpu/core.c and export it, because: - The xfeatures_mask_all is indirectly used via copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() by KVM. The function which is directly used by other modules should be exported. - The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a function, while xfeatures_mask_all is a variable for the "internal" FPU state. It's safer to export a function than a variable, which may be implicitly changed by others. - The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a big function with many checks. The removal of the inline keyword should not impact the performance. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1593780569-62993-20-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
2020-06-29x86/fpu: Reset MXCSR to default in kernel_fpu_begin()Petteri Aimonen
Previously, kernel floating point code would run with the MXCSR control register value last set by userland code by the thread that was active on the CPU core just before kernel call. This could affect calculation results if rounding mode was changed, or a crash if a FPU/SIMD exception was unmasked. Restore MXCSR to the kernel's default value. [ bp: Carve out from a bigger patch by Petteri, add feature check, add FNINIT call too (amluto). ] Signed-off-by: Petteri Aimonen <jpa@git.mail.kapsi.fi> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207979 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200624114646.28953-2-bp@alien8.de
2020-05-13x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing fpregs and xstatesFenghua Yu
Currently, fpu__clear() clears all fpregs and xstates. Once XSAVES supervisor states are introduced, supervisor settings (e.g. CET xstates) must remain active for signals; It is necessary to have separate functions: - Create fpu__clear_user_states(): clear only user settings for signals; - Create fpu__clear_all(): clear both user and supervisor settings in flush_thread(). Also modify copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() to take a mask from above two functions. Remove obvious side-comment in fpu__clear(), while at it. [ bp: Make the second argument of fpu__clear() bool after requesting it a bunch of times during review. - Add a comment about copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() locking needs. ] Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512145444.15483-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com
2019-06-17x86/fpu: Remove the fpu__save() exportChristoph Hellwig
This function is only use by the core FPU code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-4-hch@lst.de
2019-06-17x86/fpu: Simplify kernel_fpu_begin()Christoph Hellwig
Merge two helpers into the main function, remove a pointless local variable and flatten a conditional. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-3-hch@lst.de
2019-06-17x86/fpu: Simplify kernel_fpu_end()Christoph Hellwig
Remove two little helpers and merge them into kernel_fpu_end() to streamline the function. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-2-hch@lst.de