summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-27powerpc/32s: Use dedicated segment for modules with STRICT_KERNEL_RWXChristophe Leroy
When STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set, we want to set NX bit on vmalloc segments. But modules require exec. Use a dedicated segment for modules. There is not much space above kernel, and we don't waste vmalloc space to do alignment. Therefore, we take the segment before PAGE_OFFSET for modules. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/eb8faba9148b6cf17c696ba776b4e8ee2f6313bf.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc/32s: Kernel space starts at TASK_SIZEChristophe Leroy
Kernel space starts at TASK_SIZE. Select kernel page table when address is over TASK_SIZE. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/893425e32cd0a003539573b2d115e0ffa98bc26c.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc/32: Set user/kernel boundary at TASK_SIZE instead of PAGE_OFFSETChristophe Leroy
User space stops at TASK_SIZE. At the moment, kernel space starts at PAGE_OFFSET. In order to use space between TASK_SIZE and PAGE_OFFSET for modules, make TASK_SIZE the limit between user and kernel space. Note that fault.c already considers TASK_SIZE as the boundary between user and kernel space. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b38b52cd8dabbb56fbd6f9219d6f3cdccbb43b44.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc/32s: Only leave NX unset on segments used for modulesChristophe Leroy
Instead of leaving NX unset on all segments above the start of vmalloc space, only leave NX unset on segments used for modules. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7172c0f5253419315e434a1816ee3d6ed6505bc0.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc: Use MODULES_VADDR if definedChristophe Leroy
In order to allow allocation of modules outside of vmalloc space, use MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END when MODULES_VADDR is defined. Redefine module_alloc() when MODULES_VADDR defined. Unmap corresponding KASAN shadow memory. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7ecf5fff1eef67d450e73fc412b6ec3818483d75.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc/lib: Prepare code-patching for modules allocated outside vmalloc spaceChristophe Leroy
Use is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() instead of is_vmalloc_addr() Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7d884db0e5a6f521331639d8c0f13e520d5a4fef.1593428200.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2020-07-27powerpc/papr_scm: Make some symbols staticWei Yongjun
The sparse tool complains as follows: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:97:1: warning: symbol 'papr_nd_regions' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:98:1: warning: symbol 'papr_ndr_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? Those variables are not used outside of papr_scm.c, so this commit marks them static. Fixes: 85343a8da2d9 ("powerpc/papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725091949.75234-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
2020-07-27powerpc/64s: allow for clang's objdump differencesBill Wendling
Clang's objdump emits slightly different output from GNU's objdump, causing a list of warnings to be emitted during relocatable builds. E.g., clang's objdump emits this: c000000000000004: 2c 00 00 48 b 0xc000000000000030 ... c000000000005c6c: 10 00 82 40 bf 2, 0xc000000000005c7c while GNU objdump emits: c000000000000004: 2c 00 00 48 b c000000000000030 <__start+0x30> ... c000000000005c6c: 10 00 82 40 bne c000000000005c7c <masked_interrupt+0x3c> Adjust llvm-objdump's output to remove the extraneous '0x' and convert 'bf' and 'bt' to 'bne' and 'beq' resp. to more closely match GNU objdump's output. Note that clang's objdump doesn't yet output the relocation symbols on PPC. Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/191c67db31264b69cf6b566fd69851beb3dd0abb.1595630874.git.morbo@google.com
2020-07-27powerpc: Implement smp_cond_load_relaxed()Nicholas Piggin
This implements smp_cond_load_relaxed() with the slowpath busy loop using the preferred SMT priority pattern. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> [mpe: Make it 64-bit only to fix build errors on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-7-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-27powerpc/qspinlock: Optimised atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock() that adds the lock hintNicholas Piggin
This brings the behaviour of the uncontended fast path back to roughly equivalent to simple spinlocks -- a single atomic op with lock hint. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-6-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-27powerpc/pseries: Implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPARNicholas Piggin
This implements the generic paravirt qspinlocks using H_PROD and H_CONFER to kick and wait. This uses an un-directed yield to any CPU rather than the directed yield to a pre-empted lock holder that paravirtualised simple spinlocks use, that requires no kick hcall. This is something that could be investigated and improved in future. Performance results can be found in the commit which added queued spinlocks. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-5-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-27powerpc/64s: Implement queued spinlocks and rwlocksNicholas Piggin
These have shown significantly improved performance and fairness when spinlock contention is moderate to high on very large systems. With this series including subsequent patches, on a 16 socket 1536 thread POWER9, a stress test such as same-file open/close from all CPUs gets big speedups, 11620op/s aggregate with simple spinlocks vs 384158op/s (33x faster), where the difference in throughput between the fastest and slowest thread goes from 7x to 1.4x. Thanks to the fast path being identical in terms of atomics and barriers (after a subsequent optimisation patch), single threaded performance is not changed (no measurable difference). On smaller systems, performance and fairness seems to be generally improved. Using dbench on tmpfs as a test (that starts to run into kernel spinlock contention), a 2-socket OpenPOWER POWER9 system was tested with bare metal and KVM guest configurations. Results can be found here: https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/305#issuecomment-663487453 Observations are: - Queued spinlocks are equal when contention is insignificant, as expected and as measured with microbenchmarks. - When there is contention, on bare metal queued spinlocks have better throughput and max latency at all points. - When virtualised, queued spinlocks are slightly worse approaching peak throughput, but significantly better throughput and max latency at all points beyond peak, until queued spinlock maximum latency rises when clients are 2x vCPUs. The regressions haven't been analysed very well yet, there are a lot of things that can be tuned, particularly the paravirtualised locking, but the numbers already look like a good net win even on relatively small systems. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-4-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc: Move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlockNicholas Piggin
To prepare for queued spinlocks. This is a simple rename except to update preprocessor guard name and a file reference. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-3-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/pseries: Move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own fileNicholas Piggin
These functions will be used by the queued spinlock implementation, and may be useful elsewhere too, so move them out of spinlock.h. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724131423.1362108-2-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/numa: Limit possible nodes to within num_possible_nodesSrikar Dronamraju
MAX_NUMNODES is a theoretical maximum number of nodes thats is supported by the kernel. Device tree properties exposes the number of possible nodes on the current platform. The kernel would detected this and would use it for most of its resource allocations. If the platform now increases the nodes to over what was already exposed, then it may lead to inconsistencies. Hence limit it to the already exposed nodes. Suggested-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724105809.24733-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2020-07-26macintosh/adb-iop: Implement SRQ autopollingFinn Thain
The adb_driver.autopoll method is needed during ADB bus scan and device address assignment. Implement this method so that the IOP's list of device addresses can be updated. When the list is empty, disable SRQ autopolling. Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0fb7fdcd99d7820bb27faf1f27f7f6f1923914ef.1590880623.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au
2020-07-26powerpc/perf: Initialize power10 PMU registers in cpu setup routineAthira Rajeev
Initialize Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3) SPR which is new in power10. For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This patch also initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB feature at boot for power10. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595489557-2047-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Remove vfs_expandedOliver O'Halloran
Previously iov->vfs_expanded was used for two purposes. 1) To work out how much we need to multiple the per-VF BAR size to figure out the total space required for the IOV BAR. 2) To indicate that IOV is not usable with this device (vfs_expanded == 0). We don't really need the field for either since the multiple in 1) is always the number PEs supported by the PHB. Similarly, we don't really need it in 2) either since the IOV data field will be NULL if we can't use IOV with the device. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-16-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Make single PE mode a per-BAR settingOliver O'Halloran
Using single PE BARs to map an SR-IOV BAR is really a choice about what strategy to use when mapping a BAR. It doesn't make much sense for this to be a global setting since a device might have one large BAR which needs to be mapped with single PE windows and another smaller BAR that can be mapped with a regular segmented window. Make the segmented vs single decision a per-BAR setting and clean up the logic that decides which mode to use. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-15-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Refactor M64 BAR setupOliver O'Halloran
Split up the logic so that we have one branch that handles setting up a segmented window and another that handles setting up single PE windows for each VF. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-14-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Move M64 BAR allocation into a helperOliver O'Halloran
I want to refactor the loop this code is currently inside of. Hoist it on out. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-13-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: De-indent setup and teardownOliver O'Halloran
Remove the IODA2 PHB checks. We already assume IODA2 in several places so there's not much point in wrapping most of the setup and teardown process in an if block. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-12-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Drop iov->pe_num_map[]Oliver O'Halloran
Currently the iov->pe_num_map[] does one of two things depending on whether single PE mode is being used or not. When it is, this contains an array which maps a vf_index to the corresponding PE number. When single PE mode is not being used this contains a scalar which is the base PE for the set of enabled VFs (for for VFn is base + n). The array was necessary because when calling pnv_ioda_alloc_pe() there is no guarantee that the allocated PEs would be contigious. We can now allocate contigious blocks of PEs so this is no longer an issue. This allows us to drop the if (single_mode) {} .. else {} block scattered through the SR-IOV code which is a nice clean up. This also fixes a bug in pnv_pci_sriov_disable() which is the non-atomic bitmap_clear() to manipulate the PE allocation map. Other users of the map assume it will be accessed with atomic ops. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-11-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/pci: Refactor pnv_ioda_alloc_pe()Oliver O'Halloran
Rework the PE allocation logic to allow allocating blocks of PEs rather than individually. We'll use this to allocate contigious blocks of PEs for the SR-IOVs. This patch also adds code to pnv_ioda_alloc_pe() and pnv_ioda_reserve_pe() to use the existing, but unused, phb->pe_alloc_mutex. Currently these functions use atomic bit ops to release a currently allocated PE number. However, the pnv_ioda_alloc_pe() wants to have exclusive access to the bit map while scanning for hole large enough to accomodate the allocation size. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-10-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Factor out M64 BAR setupOliver O'Halloran
The sequence required to use the single PE BAR mode is kinda janky and requires a little explanation. The API was designed with P7-IOC style windows where the setup process is something like: 1. Configure the window start / end address 2. Enable the window 3. Map the segments of each window to the PE For Single PE BARs the process is: 1. Set the PE for segment zero on a disabled window 2. Set the range 3. Enable the window Move the OPAL calls into their own helper functions where the quirks can be contained. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-9-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Simplify used window trackingOliver O'Halloran
No need for the multi-dimensional arrays, just use a bitmap. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-8-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Rename truncate_iovOliver O'Halloran
This prevents SR-IOV being used by making the SR-IOV BAR resources unallocatable. Rename it to reflect what it actually does. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-7-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Explain how SR-IOV works on PowerNVOliver O'Halloran
SR-IOV support on PowerNV is a byzantine maze of hooks. I have no idea how anyone is supposed to know how it works except through a lot of stuffering. Write up some docs about the overall story to help out the next sucker^Wperson who needs to tinker with it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-6-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/sriov: Move SR-IOV into a separate fileOliver O'Halloran
pci-ioda.c is getting a bit unwieldly due to the amount of stuff jammed in there. The SR-IOV support can be extracted easily enough and is mostly standalone, so move it into a separate file. This patch also moves the PowerNV SR-IOV specific fields from pci_dn and moves them into a platform specific structure. I'm not sure how they ended up in there in the first place, but leaking platform specifics into common code has proven to be a terrible idea so far so lets stop doing that. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-5-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/pci: Initialise M64 for IODA1 as a 1-1 windowOliver O'Halloran
We pre-configure the m64 window for IODA1 as a 1-1 segment-PE mapping, similar to PHB3. Currently the actual mapping of segments occurs in pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(), but we can move it into pnv_ioda1_init_m64() and drop the IODA1 specific code paths in the PE setup / teardown. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-4-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/pci: Add explicit tracking of the DMA setup stateOliver O'Halloran
There's an optimisation in the PE setup which skips performing DMA setup for a PE if we only have bridges in a PE. The assumption being that only "real" devices will DMA to system memory, which is probably fair. However, if we start off with only bridge devices in a PE then add a non-bridge device the new device won't be able to use DMA because we never configured it. Fix this (admittedly pretty weird) edge case by tracking whether we've done the DMA setup for the PE or not. If a non-bridge device is added to the PE (via rescan or hotplug, or whatever) we can set up DMA on demand. This also means the only remaining user of the old "DMA Weight" code is the IODA1 DMA setup code that it was originally added for, which is good. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-3-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/pci: Always tear down DMA windows on PE releaseOliver O'Halloran
Currently we have these two functions: pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(), and pnv_pci_ioda2_release_pe_dma() The first is used when tearing down VF PEs and the other is used for normal devices. There's very little difference between the two though. The latter (non-VF) will skip a call to pnv_pci_ioda2_unset_window() unless CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y is set. There's no real point in doing this so fold the two together. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-2-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/powernv/pci: Add pci_bus_to_pnvhb() helperOliver O'Halloran
Add a helper to go from a pci_bus structure to the pnv_phb that hosts that bus. There's a lot of instances of the following pattern: struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data; Without any other uses of the pci_controller inside the function. This is hard to read since it requires you to memorise the contents of the private data fields and kind of error prone since it involves blindly assigning a void pointer. Add a helper to make it more concise and explicit. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722065715.1432738-1-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platformOliver O'Halloran
The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a 1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the "tree" is really just a single node. Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct" this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything. We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-14-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert()Oliver O'Halloran
This is mostly just to make the subsequent diffs less noisy. No functional changes. One thing that needs calling out is the removal of the "config_addr" variable and replacing it with edev->bdfn. The contents of edev->bdfn are the same, however it's worth pointing out that what RTAS calls a "config_addr" isn't the same as the bdfn. The config_addr is supposed to be: <bus><devfn><reg> with each field being an 8 bit number. Various parts of the EEH code use BDFN and "config_addr" as interchangeable quantities even though they aren't really. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-13-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe()Oliver O'Halloran
The naming of eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() doesn't really reflect what they actually do. If the PE referred to be edev->pe_config_addr already exists under that PHB then the edev is added to that PE. However, if the PE doesn't exist the a new one is created for the edev. The bulk of the implementation of eeh_add_to_parent_pe() covers that second case. Similarly, most of eeh_remove_from_parent_pe() is determining when it's safe to delete a PE. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-12-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edevOliver O'Halloran
The edev->class_code field is never referenced anywhere except for the platform specific probe functions. The same information is available in the pci_dev for PowerNV and in the pci_dn on pseries so we can remove the field. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-11-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove spurious use of pci_dn in eeh_dump_dev_logOliver O'Halloran
Retrieve the domain, bus, device, and function numbers from the edev. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-10-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-9-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-8-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-7-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restorationOliver O'Halloran
There's a bunch of strange things about this code. First up is that none of the fields being written to are functional for a VF. The SR-IOV specification lists then as "Reserved, but OS should preserve" so writing new values to them doesn't do anything and is clearly wrong from a correctness perspective. However, since VFs are designed to be managed by the OS there is an argument to be made that we should be saving and restoring some parts of config space. We already sort of do that by saving the first 64 bytes of config space in the eeh_dev (see eeh_dev->config_space[]). This is inadequate since it doesn't even consider saving and restoring the PCI capability structures. However, this is a problem with EEH in general and that needs to be fixed for non-VF devices too. There's no real reason to keep around this around so delete it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-6-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr()Oliver O'Halloran
This is used in precisely one place which is in pseries specific platform code. There's no need to have the callback in eeh_ops since the platform chooses the EEH PE addresses anyway. The PowerNV implementation has always been a stub too so remove it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-5-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/pseries: Stop using pdn->pe_numberOliver O'Halloran
The pci_dn->pe_number field is mainly used to track the IODA PE number of a device on PowerNV. At some point it grew a user in the pseries SR-IOV support which muddies the waters a bit, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-4-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_devOliver O'Halloran
Drivers that do not support the PCI error handling callbacks are handled by tearing down the device and re-probing them. If the device being removed is a virtual function then we need to know the VF index so it can be removed using the pci_iov_{add|remove}_virtfn() API. Currently this is handled by looking up the pci_dn, and using the vf_index that was stashed there when the pci_dn for the VF was created in pcibios_sriov_enable(). We would like to eliminate the use of pci_dn outside of pseries though so we need to provide the generic EEH code with some other way to find the vf_index. The easiest thing to do here is move the vf_index field out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev. Currently pci_dn and eeh_dev are allocated and initialized together so this is a fairly minimal change in preparation for splitting pci_dn and eeh_dev in the future. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-3-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.cOliver O'Halloran
The only thing in this file is eeh_dev_init() which is allocates and initialises an eeh_dev based on a pci_dn. This is only ever called from pci_dn.c so move it into there and remove the file. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-2-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()Oliver O'Halloran
This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin and removes a layer of indirection. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-1-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/watchpoint: Remove 512 byte boundaryRavi Bangoria
Power10 has removed 512 bytes boundary from match criteria i.e. the watch range can cross 512 bytes boundary. Note: ISA 3.1 Book III 9.4 match criteria includes 512 byte limit but that is a documentation mistake and hopefully will be fixed in the next version of ISA. Though, ISA 3.1 change log mentions about removal of 512B boundary: Multiple DEAW: Added a second Data Address Watchpoint. [H]DAR is set to the first byte of overlap. 512B boundary is removed. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723090813.303838-11-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
2020-07-26powerpc/watchpoint: Return available watchpoints dynamicallyRavi Bangoria
So far Book3S Powerpc supported only one watchpoint. Power10 is introducing 2nd DAWR. Enable 2nd DAWR support for Power10. Availability of 2nd DAWR will depend on CPU_FTR_DAWR1. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723090813.303838-10-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
2020-07-26powerpc/watchpoint: Guest support for 2nd DAWR hcallRavi Bangoria
2nd DAWR can be set/unset using H_SET_MODE hcall with resource value 5. Enable powervm guest support with that. This has no effect on kvm guest because kvm will return error if guest does hcall with resource value 5. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723090813.303838-9-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com