| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The code in crypto_aegis128_process_crypt() had an indentation
issue where spaces were used instead of tabs. This commit
corrects the indentation to use tabs, adhering to the
Linux kernel coding style guidelines.
Issue reported by checkpatch:
- ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
No functional changes are intended.
Signed-off-by: Riyan Dhiman <riyandhiman14@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This patch fixes missing prototype warnings in crypto/aegis128-neon.c.
Fixes: a4397635afea ("crypto: aegis128 - provide a SIMD...")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Geert reports that builds where CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD is not set
may still emit references to crypto_aegis128_update_simd(), which
cannot be satisfied and therefore break the build. These references
only exist in functions that can be optimized away, but apparently,
the compiler is not always able to prove this.
So add some explicit checks for CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD to help the
compiler figure this out.
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Wiring the SIMD code into the generic driver has the unfortunate side
effect that the tcrypt testing code cannot distinguish them, and will
therefore not use the latter to fuzz test the former, as it does for
other algorithms.
So let's refactor the code a bit so we can register two implementations:
aegis128-generic and aegis128-simd.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Instead of calculating the tag and returning it to the caller on
decryption, use a SIMD compare and min across vector to perform
the comparison. This is slightly more efficient, and removes the
need on the caller's part to wipe the tag from memory if the
decryption failed.
While at it, switch to unsigned int when passing cryptlen and
assoclen - we don't support input sizes where it matters anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The AEGIS spec mentions explicitly that the security guarantees hold
only if the resulting plaintext and tag of a failed decryption are
withheld. So ensure that we abide by this.
While at it, drop the unused struct aead_request *req parameter from
crypto_aegis128_process_crypt().
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
The CRYPTO_TFM_RES_BAD_KEY_LEN flag was apparently meant as a way to
make the ->setkey() functions provide more information about errors.
However, no one actually checks for this flag, which makes it pointless.
Also, many algorithms fail to set this flag when given a bad length key.
Reviewing just the generic implementations, this is the case for
aes-fixed-time, cbcmac, echainiv, nhpoly1305, pcrypt, rfc3686, rfc4309,
rfc7539, rfc7539esp, salsa20, seqiv, and xcbc. But there are probably
many more in arch/*/crypto/ and drivers/crypto/.
Some algorithms can even set this flag when the key is the correct
length. For example, authenc and authencesn set it when the key payload
is malformed in any way (not just a bad length), the atmel-sha and ccree
drivers can set it if a memory allocation fails, and the chelsio driver
sets it for bad auth tag lengths, not just bad key lengths.
So even if someone actually wanted to start checking this flag (which
seems unlikely, since it's been unused for a long time), there would be
a lot of work needed to get it working correctly. But it would probably
be much better to go back to the drawing board and just define different
return values, like -EINVAL if the key is invalid for the algorithm vs.
-EKEYREJECTED if the key was rejected by a policy like "no weak keys".
That would be much simpler, less error-prone, and easier to test.
So just remove this flag.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
In order to speed up aegis128 processing even more, duplicate the init()
and final() routines as SIMD versions in their entirety. This results
in a 2x speedup on ARM Cortex-A57 for ~1500 byte packets (using AES
instructions).
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Instead of passing around an ops structure with function pointers,
which forces indirect calls to be used, refactor the code slightly
so we can use ordinary function calls. At the same time, switch to
a static key to decide whether or not the SIMD code path may be used.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
crypto/aegis.h:27:32: warning:
crypto_aegis_const defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
crypto_aegis_const is only used in aegis128-core.c,
just move the definition over there.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add some plumbing to allow the AEGIS128 code to be built with SIMD
routines for acceleration.
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
This reverts commit ecc8bc81f2fb3976737ef312f824ba6053aa3590
("crypto: aegis128 - provide a SIMD implementation based on NEON
intrinsics") and commit 7cdc0ddbf74a19cecb2f0e9efa2cae9d3c665189
("crypto: aegis128 - add support for SIMD acceleration").
They cause compile errors on platforms other than ARM because
the mechanism to selectively compile the SIMD code is broken.
Repoted-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Add some plumbing to allow the AEGIS128 code to be built with SIMD
routines for acceleration.
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
