| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since we are system_highpri_wq, we expected the heartbeat to be
scheduled promptly. However, we see delays of over 10ms upsetting our
assertions. Accept this as inevitable and bump the minimum error
threshold to 20ms (from 6 jiffies).
<6> [616.784749] rcs0: Heartbeat delay: 3570us [2802, 9188]
<6> [616.807790] bcs0: Heartbeat delay: 2111us [745, 4372]
<6> [616.853776] vcs0: Heartbeat delay: 6485us [2424, 11637]
<3> [616.859296] vcs0: Heartbeat delay was 6485us, expected less than 6000us
<3> [616.860901] i915/intel_heartbeat_live_selftests: live_heartbeat_fast failed with error -22
v2: More context from CI.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210113163115.5740-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In order to test how fast the heartbeat can respond, we measure with the
interval set to its minimum. Before we measure though, we want to be
sure we start with a fresh pulse, and so wait until any old one is
complete. During that wait though, we were continually flushing the
work, and so continually re-evaluating to see if the pulse was complete,
and each attempt would count as an unresponsive system. If the engine
did not complete the request in the couple of busy-spins, it would flag
an error. This is unfortunate, so let's not busy-spin waiting for the
old heartbeat, but terminate it and start afresh.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201019142841.32273-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We use i915_active_fini() as a debug check on the i915_active state
before freeing. If we forget to call it, we may end up angering the
debugobjects contained within.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731085015.32368-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
A couple of very simple tests to ensure that the basic properties of
per-engine busyness accounting [0% and 100% busy] are faithful.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200617130916.15261-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Still chasing the mystery of the stray idle flush, let's ensure that the
heartbeat does not run at the same time as our test and confuse us.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/541
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing
a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate
address space (for our own protection).
Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop
referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random
and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use.
GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context
the execution environment on the GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Wait on only the last request on the kernel_context after emitting a
barrier so that we do not wait for everything in general and by doing so
cause an accidental emission of the barrier!
Bugzilla; https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191129103455.744389-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We have a case of a mysteriously absent pulse, so dump the engine
details to see if we can find out what happened to it.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128102546.3857140-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Flushing the outer i915_active is not enough, as we need the barrier to
be applied across all the active dma_fence callbacks. So we must
serialise with each outstanding fence.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096
References: f79520bb3337 ("drm/i915/selftests: Synchronize checking active status with retirement")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101181022.25633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
If the idle_pulse fails to flush the i915_active, dump the tree to see
if that has any clues.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031101116.19894-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
When checking the heartbeat pulse, we expect it to have been sent by the
time we have slept. We can verify this by checking the engine serial
number to see if that matches the predicted pulse serial. It will always
be true if, and only if, the pulse was sent by itself (as designed by
the test).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031094259.23028-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
drivers/gpu/drm/i915//gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c:255 live_heartbeat_fast() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915//gt/selftest_engine_heartbeat.c:320 live_heartbeat_off() error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025135943.12524-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Make trebly sure that all possible callbacks and their delayed brethren
are complete before asserting that the i915_active should be idle after
flushing all barriers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023235359.27132-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Replace sampling the engine state every so often with a periodic
heartbeat request to measure the health of an engine. This is coupled
with the forced-preemption to allow long running requests to survive so
long as they do not block other users.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
If retirement is running on another thread, we may inspect the status of
the i915_active before its retirement callback is complete. As we expect
it to be running synchronously, we can wait for any callback to complete
by acquiring the i915_active.mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022112111.9317-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
To flush idle barriers, and even inflight requests, we want to send a
preemptive 'pulse' along an engine. We use a no-op request along the
pinned kernel_context at high priority so that it should run or else
kick off the stuck requests. We can use this to ensure idle barriers are
immediately flushed, as part of a context cancellation mechanism, or as
part of a heartbeat mechanism to detect and reset a stuck GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021174339.5389-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
