summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pwm/core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-01-20Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.17-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding: "This contains a number of nice cleanups and improvements for the core and various drivers, as well as a minor tweak to the json-schema device tree bindings" * tag 'pwm/for-5.17-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: dt-bindings: pwm: Avoid selecting schema on node name match pwm: img: Use only a single idiom to get a runtime PM reference pwm: vt8500: Implement .apply() callback pwm: img: Implement .apply() callback pwm: twl: Implement .apply() callback pwm: Restore initial state if a legacy callback fails pwm: Prevent a glitch for legacy drivers pwm: Move legacy driver handling into a dedicated function
2021-11-18Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-nextThomas Zimmermann
Backmerging from drm/drm-next for v5.16-rc1. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
2021-11-17pwm: Restore initial state if a legacy callback failsUwe Kleine-König
It is not entirely accurate to go back to the initial state after e.g. .enable() failed, as .config() still modified the hardware, but this same inconsistency exists for drivers that implement .apply(). Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-11-17pwm: Prevent a glitch for legacy driversUwe Kleine-König
If a running PWM is reconfigured to disabled calling the ->config() callback before disabling the hardware might result in a glitch where the (maybe) new period and duty_cycle are visible on the output before disabling the hardware. So handle disabling before calling ->config(). Also exit early in this case which is possible because period and duty_cycle don't matter for disabled PWMs. In return however ->config has to be called even if state->period == pwm->state.period && state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle because setting these might have been skipped in the previous call. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-11-17pwm: Move legacy driver handling into a dedicated functionUwe Kleine-König
There is no change in behaviour, only some code is moved from pwm_apply_state to a separate function. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-11-05pwm: Make it explicit that pwm_apply_state() might sleepUwe Kleine-König
At least some implementations sleep. So mark pwm_apply_state() with a might_sleep() to make callers aware. In the worst case this uncovers a valid atomic user, then we revert this patch and at least gained some more knowledge and then can work on a concept similar to gpio_get_value/gpio_get_value_cansleep. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-10-27pwm: Introduce single-PWM of_xlate functionBjorn Andersson
The existing pxa driver and the upcoming addition of PWM support in the TI sn565dsi86 DSI/eDP bridge driver both has a single PWM channel and thereby a need for a of_xlate function with the period as its single argument. Introduce a common helper function in the core that can be used as of_xlate by such drivers and migrate the pxa driver to use this. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> Tested-By: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211025170925.3096444-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
2021-09-02pwm: Make pwmchip_remove() return voidUwe Kleine-König
Since some time pwmchip_remove() always returns 0 so the return value isn't usefull. Now that all callers are converted to ignore its value the function can be changed to return void. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-07-07pwm: Remove redundant assignment to pointer pwmColin Ian King
The pointer pwm is being initialized with a value that is never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization is redundant and can be removed. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-30pwm: core: Simplify some devm_*pwm*() functionsAndy Shevchenko
Use devm_add_action_or_reset() instead of devres_alloc() and devres_add(), which works the same. This will simplify the code. There is no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-30pwm: core: Remove unused devm_pwm_put()Andy Shevchenko
There are no users and seems no will come of the devm_pwm_put(). Remove the function. While at it, slightly update documentation. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-30pwm: core: Unify fwnode checks in the moduleAndy Shevchenko
Historically we have two different approaches on how to check type of fwnode. Unify them using the latest and greatest fwnode related APIs. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-30pwm: core: Reuse fwnode_to_pwmchip() in ACPI caseAndy Shevchenko
In ACPI case we may use matching by fwnode as provided via fwnode_to_pwmchip(). This makes device_to_pwmchip() not needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-30pwm: core: Convert to use fwnode for matchingAndy Shevchenko
When we traverse the list of the registered PWM controllers, use fwnode to match. This will help for further cleanup. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-28pwm: Drop irrelevant error path from pwmchip_remove()Uwe Kleine-König
Since the PWM core uses device links (commit b2c200e3f2fd ("pwm: Add consumer device link")) each consumer driver that requested the PWMs is already gone. If they called pwm_put() (as they should) the PWMF_REQUESTED bit is not set. If they failed (which is a bug) the PWMF_REQUESTED bit might still be set, but the driver that cared is gone, so nothing bad happens if the PWM chip goes away even if the PWMF_REQUESTED is still present. So the check can be dropped. With this change pwmchip_remove() returns always 0, so lowlevel drivers don't need to check the return code any more. Once all drivers dropped this check this function can be changed to return void. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-28pwm: Add a device-managed function to add PWM chipsUwe Kleine-König
This potentially simplifies low-level PWM drivers. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-06-04pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM stateClemens Gruber
If usage_power is set, the PWM driver is only required to maintain the power output but has more freedom regarding signal form. If supported, the signal can be optimized, for example to improve EMI by phase shifting individual channels. Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-05-25pwm: Autodetect default value for of_pwm_n_cells from device treeUwe Kleine-König
This allows to simplify all drivers that use three pwm-cells. The only ugly side effect is that if a driver specified of_pwm_n_cells = 2 it suddenly supports device trees that use #pwm-cells = <3>. This however isn't a bad thing because the driver doesn't need explicit support for three cells as the core handles all the details. Also there is no such in-tree driver. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-05-25pwm: Drop of_pwm_simple_xlate() in favour of of_pwm_xlate_with_flags()Uwe Kleine-König
Since the previous commit the latter function can do everything that the former does. So simplify accordingly. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-05-25pwm: Make of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() work with #pwm-cells = <2>Uwe Kleine-König
The two functions of_pwm_simple_xlate() and of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() are quite similar. of_pwm_simple_xlate() only supports two-cell PWM specifiers while of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() only supports PWM specifiers with 3 or more cells. The latter can easily be modified to behave identically to of_pwm_simple_xlate() for two-cell PWM specifiers. This is implemented here and allows to drop of_pwm_simple_xlate() in the next commit. There is a small detail that is different now in the two-cell specifier case in of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(): pwm->args.polarity is unconditionally initialized to PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL in the latter. I didn't find a case where this matters and doing that explicitly is the more robust approach. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> [thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix up checkpatch warnings] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-03-22pwm: Drop function pwmchip_add_with_polarity()Uwe Kleine-König
pwmchip_add() only calls pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and nothing else. All other users of pwmchip_add_with_polarity() are gone. So drop pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and move the code instead to pwmchip_add(). The initial assignment to pwm->state.polarity is dropped. In every correct usage of the PWM API this value is overwritten later anyhow. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-03-22pwm: Return -EINVAL for old-style drivers without .set_polarity callbackUwe Kleine-König
Since commit 2b1c1a5d5148 ("pwm: Use -EINVAL for unsupported polarity") all drivers implementing the apply callback are unified to return -EINVAL if an unsupported polarity is requested. Do the same in the compat code for old-style drivers. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2021-03-22pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamicallyUwe Kleine-König
Since commit 5e5da1e9fbee ("pwm: ab8500: Explicitly allocate pwm chip base dynamically") all drivers use dynamic ID allocation explicitly. New drivers are supposed to do the same, so remove support for driver specified base IDs and drop all assignments in the low-level drivers. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-12-17pwm: core: Use octal permissionSoham Biswas
Permission bits are easier readable in octal than with using the symbolic names. Fixes the following warning generated by checkpatch: WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'. #1341: FILE: drivers/pwm/core.c:1341: + debugfs_create_file("pwm", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, NULL, NULL, Signed-off-by: Soham Biswas <sohambiswas41@gmail.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-09-24pwm: Convert to use DEFINE_SEQ_ATTRIBUTE macroLiu Shixin
Use DEFINE_SEQ_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-06-17pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64Guru Das Srinagesh
Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the PWM framework so that higher durations may be set. Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c, pwm-stm32-lp.c as well as video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-06-04pwm: Add missing "CONFIG_" prefixKees Cook
The IS_ENABLED() use was missing the CONFIG_ prefix which would have lead to skipping this code. Fixes: 3ad1f3a33286 ("pwm: Implement some checks for lowlevel drivers") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-04-14pwm: Add missing '\n' in log messagesChristophe JAILLET
Message logged by 'dev_xxx()' or 'pr_xxx()' should end with a '\n'. Fixes: 3ad1f3a33286 ("pwm: Implement some checks for lowlevel drivers") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-04-03pwm: Make pwm_apply_state_debug() staticJason Yan
Fix the following gcc warning: drivers/pwm/core.c:467:6: warning: symbol 'pwm_apply_state_debug' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-03-30pwm: Implement some checks for lowlevel driversUwe Kleine-König
There are some expectations which the callbacks provided by lowlevel drivers should fulfill. Implement checks that help driver authors to get these semantics right. As these have some overhead the checks can be disabled using a Kconfig setting. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-01-20pwm: Implement tracing for .get_state() and .apply_state()Uwe Kleine-König
This allows to log all calls to the driver's lowlevel functions which simplifies debugging in some cases. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-12-09pwm: Read initial hardware state at request timeThierry Reding
Drivers that support reading the hardware state (using ->get_state()) may want to rely on per-PWM data to do so. Defer reading the hardware state for the first time until the PWM has been requested and after drivers have had a chance to allocate per-PWM data. Conceptually this is also a more natural place to read the hardware state because the PWM core doesn't need to know the hardware state of a PWM unless there is a user for it. This also ensures that the state is read everytime a user requests a PWM. If the PWM changes between users for some reason, the PWM core will reload the state from hardware and keep its copy of the state up-to-date. Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Tested-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@ysoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-10-21Revert "pwm: Let pwm_get_state() return the last implemented state"Thierry Reding
It turns out that commit 01ccf903edd6 ("pwm: Let pwm_get_state() return the last implemented state") causes backlight failures on a number of boards. The reason is that some of the drivers do not write the full state through to the hardware registers, which means that ->get_state() subsequently does not return the correct state. Consumers which rely on pwm_get_state() returning the current state will therefore get confused and subsequently try to program a bad state. Before this change can be made, existing drivers need to be more carefully audited and fixed to behave as the framework expects. Until then, keep the original behaviour of returning the software state that was applied rather than reading the state back from hardware. Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Tested-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@ysoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-09-21pwm: Ensure pwm_apply_state() doesn't modify the state argumentUwe Kleine-König
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a driver doing: #define PERIOD 5000000 #define DUTY_LITTLE 10 ... struct pwm_state state = { .period = PERIOD, .duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE, .polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL, .enabled = true, }; pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state); ... state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2; pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state); For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call. So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all drivers' .apply callbacks. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-09-21pwm: Let pwm_get_state() return the last implemented stateUwe Kleine-König
When pwm_apply_state() is called the lowlevel driver usually has to apply some rounding because the hardware doesn't support nanosecond resolution. So let pwm_get_state() return the actually implemented state instead of the last applied one if possible. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-09-21pwm: Introduce local struct pwm_chip in pwm_apply_state()Uwe Kleine-König
pwm->chip is dereferenced several times in the pwm_apply_state() function. Introducing a local variable for it helps keeping some lines a bit shorter. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-08-08pwm: Fallback to the static lookup-list when acpi_pwm_get failsHans de Goede
Commit 4a6ef8e37c4d ("pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI") made pwm_get unconditionally return the acpi_pwm_get return value if the device passed to pwm_get has an ACPI fwnode. But even if the passed in device has an ACPI fwnode, it does not necessarily have the necessary ACPI package defining its pwm bindings, especially since the binding / API of this ACPI package has only been introduced very recently. Up until now X86/ACPI devices which use a separate pwm controller for controlling their LCD screen's backlight brightness have been relying on the static lookup-list to get their pwm. pwm_get unconditionally returning the acpi_pwm_get return value breaks this, breaking backlight control on these devices. This commit fixes this by making pwm_get fall back to the static lookup-list if acpi_pwm_get returns -ENOENT. BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96571 Reported-by: youling257@gmail.com Fixes: 4a6ef8e37c4d ("pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI") Cc: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-07-09Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.3-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding: "This set of changes contains a new driver for SiFive SoCs as well as enhancements to the core (device links are used to track dependencies between PWM providers and consumers, support for PWM controllers via ACPI, sysfs will now suspend/resume PWMs that it has claimed) and various existing drivers" * tag 'pwm/for-5.3-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: (37 commits) pwm: fsl-ftm: Make sure to unlock mutex on failure pwm: fsl-ftm: Use write protection for prescaler & polarity pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period pwm: atmel-hlcdc: Add compatible for SAM9X60 HLCDC's PWM pwm: bcm2835: Improve precision of PWM leds: pwm: Support ACPI via firmware-node framework pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI pwm: rcar: Remove suspend/resume support pwm: sysfs: Add suspend/resume support pwm: Add power management descriptions pwm: meson: Add documentation to the driver pwm: meson: Add support PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED when disabling pwm: meson: Don't cache struct pwm_state internally pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state() pwm: meson: Simplify the calculation of the pre-divider and count pwm: meson: Move pwm_set_chip_data() to meson_pwm_request() pwm: meson: Add the per-channel register offsets and bits in a struct pwm: meson: Add the meson_pwm_channel data to struct meson_pwm pwm: meson: Pass struct pwm_device to meson_pwm_calc() pwm: meson: Don't duplicate the polarity internally ...
2019-06-26pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPINikolaus Voss
In analogy to referencing a GPIO using the "gpios" property from ACPI, support referencing a PWM using the "pwms" property. ACPI entries must look like Package () {"pwms", Package () { <PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period> [, <PWM flags>]}} In contrast to the DT implementation, only _one_ PWM entry in the "pwms" property is supported. As a consequence "pwm-names"-property and con_id lookup aren't supported. Support for ACPI is added via the firmware-node framework which is an abstraction layer on top of ACPI/DT. To keep this patch clean, DT and ACPI paths are kept separate. The firmware-node framework could be used to unify both paths in a future patch. To support leds-pwm driver, an additional method devm_fwnode_pwm_get() which supports both ACPI and DT configuration is exported. Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> [thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix build failures for !ACPI] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-25pwm: Add consumer device linkFabrice Gasnier
Add a device link between the PWM consumer and the PWM provider. This enforces the PWM user to get suspended before the PWM provider. It allows proper synchronization of suspend/resume sequences: the PWM user is responsible for properly stopping PWM, before the provider gets suspended: see [1]. Add the device link in: - of_pwm_get() - pwm_get() - devm_*pwm_get() variants as it requires a reference to the device for the PWM consumer. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/5/770 Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-05-21treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 18Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program see the file copying if not write to the free software foundation 675 mass ave cambridge ma 02139 usa extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 52 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@jilayne.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190519154042.342335923@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-09pwm: Clear chip_data in pwm_put()Uwe Kleine-König
After a PWM is disposed by its user the per chip data becomes invalid. Clear the data in common code instead of the device drivers to get consistent behaviour. Before this patch only three of nine drivers cleaned up here. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: Fix deadlock warning when removing PWM devicePhong Hoang
This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # ls device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport # cd device/driver # ls bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind # echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind [ 87.659974] ====================================================== [ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted [ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock: [ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.694528] [ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock: [ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.707405] [ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 87.707405] [ 87.715574] [ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 87.723048] [ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}: [ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4 [ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74 [ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40 [ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4 [ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 [ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.792947] [ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}: [ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.913378] [ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 87.913378] [ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 87.921374] [ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1 [ 87.931808] ---- ---- [ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.953908] [ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 87.953908] [ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986: [ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c [ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8 [ 87.978872] #2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c [ 87.988001] #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.995481] [ 87.995481] stack backtrace: [ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7 [ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT) [ 88.012791] Call trace: [ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec [ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0 [ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864 [ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need separate functions anymore either. We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave any dangling sysfs files around. This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed doesn't seem to be needed. Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again. So, this patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang <phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com> [shimoda: revise the commit log and code] Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface") Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@jinso.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-01-10pwm: Drop per-chip dbg_show callbackUwe Kleine-König
This callback was introduced in commit 62099abf67a2 ("pwm: Add debugfs interface") in 2012 and up to now there is not a single user. So drop this unused code. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> [thierry.reding@gmail.com: remove kerneldoc for ->dbg_show()] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-01-10pwm: Don't use memcmp() to compare state variablesUwe Kleine-König
Given that struct pwm_state is sparse (at least on some platforms), variables of this type might represent the same state because all fields are pairwise identical but still memcmp() returns a difference because some of the unused bits are different. To prevent surprises compare member by member instead of the whole occupied memory. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-07-06pwm: Silently error out on EPROBE_DEFERJerome Brunet
In of_pwm_get(), if we fail to get the PWM chip due to probe deferal, we shouldn't print an error message. Just be silent in this case. Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: Try to load modules during pwm_get()Hans de Goede
Add a module name string to the pwm_lookup struct and if specified try to load the module using request_module() if pwmchip_find_by_name() is unable to find the PWM chip. This is a last resort to work around drivers that can't - and can't be made to - deal with deferred probe. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> [thierry.reding@gmail.com: rename new macro, reword commit message] [thierry.reding@gmail.com: add comment explaining use-case] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: Don't hold pwm_lookup_lock longer than necessaryHans de Goede
There is no need to hold pwm_lookup_lock after we're done with looping over pwm_lookup_list, so release it earlier. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: Make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optionalLothar Wassmann
Change the PWM chip driver registration so that a chip driver that supports polarity inversion can still be used with DTBs that don't provide the polarity flag as part of the specifier. This is done to provide polarity inversion support for the pwm-imx driver without having to modify all existing DTS files. Signed-off-by: Lothar Wassmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> Suggested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2017-01-30pwm: Print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug()Lothar Wassmann
Make the messages that are printed in case of fatal errors actually visible to the user without having to recompile the driver with debugging enabled. Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>