| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which
has some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().
Specifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values
we continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the
folio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the
start of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like
this one from syzbot:
BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure
assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted
6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 06/27/2024
RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871
Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d
0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8
6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89
RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]
extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]
btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373
do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397
__filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]
__filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]
filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463
btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547
__fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422
task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]
do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035
x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640
arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at
0x7f5f075b709f.
I was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of
generic/475, which also hits IO errors by design.
I instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the
undesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:
folio_unlock+5
__process_pages_contig+475
cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230
cow_file_range+803
btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566
writepage_delalloc+332
__extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here
extent_write_cache_pages+622
Looking at the bisected-to patch in the syzbot report, Josef realized
that the logic of the cow_file_range_inline error path subtly changing.
In the past, on error, it jumped to out_unlock in cow_file_range(),
which honors the locked_page, so when we ultimately call
folio_end_all_writers(), the folio of interest is still locked. After
the change, we always unlocked ignoring the locked_page, on both success
and error. On the success path, this all results in returning 1 to
__extent_writepage(), which skips the folio_end_all_writers() call,
which makes it OK to have unlocked.
Fix the bug by wiring the locked_page into cow_file_range_inline() and
only setting locked_page to NULL on success.
Reported-by: syzbot+a14d8ac9af3a2a4fd0c8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0586d0a89e77 ("btrfs: move extent bit and page cleanup into cow_file_range_inline")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we attempt to insert a compressed extent map that has a range that
overlaps another extent map we have in the inode's extent map tree, we
can end up with an incorrect offset after adjusting the new extent map at
merge_extent_mapping() because we don't update the extent map's offset.
For example consider the following scenario:
1) We have a file extent item for a compressed extent covering the file
range [108K, 144K) and currently there's no corresponding extent map
in the inode's extent map tree;
2) The inode's size is 141K;
3) We have an encoded write (compressed) into the file range [120K, 128K),
which overlaps the existing file extent item. The encoded write creates
a matching extent map, adds it to the inode's extent map tree and
creates an ordered extent for it.
Note that the corresponding file extent item is added to the subvolume
tree only when the ordered extent completes (when executing
btrfs_finish_one_ordered());
4) We have a write into the file range [160K, 164K).
This writes increases the i_size of the file, and there's a hole
between the current i_size (141K) and the start offset of this write,
and since the old i_size is in the middle of the block [140K, 144K),
we have to write zeroes to the range [141K, 144K) (3072 bytes) and
therefore dirty that page.
We then call btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() with a start offset of 140K.
We then end up at btrfs_find_new_delalloc_bytes() which will call
btrfs_get_extent() for the range [140K, 144K);
5) The btrfs_get_extent() doesn't find any extent map in the inode's
extent map tree covering the range [140K, 144K), so it searches the
subvolume tree for any file extent items covering that range.
There it finds the file extent item for the range [108K, 144K),
creates a compressed extent map for that range and then calls
btrfs_add_extent_mapping() with that extent map and passes the
range [140K, 144K) via the "start" and "len" parameters;
6) The call to add_extent_mapping() done by btrfs_add_extent_mapping()
fails with -EEXIST because there's an extent map, created at step 2
for the [120K, 128K) range, that covers that overlaps with the range
of the given extent map ([108K, 144K)).
Then it does a lookup for extent map from step 2 add calls
merge_extent_mapping() to adjust the input extent map ([108K, 144K)).
That adjust the extent map to a start offset of 128K and a length
of 16K (starting just after the extent map from step 2), but it does
not update the offset field of the extent map, leaving it with a value
of zero instead of updating to a value of 20K (128K - 108K = 20K).
As a result any read for the range [128K, 144K) can return
incorrect data since we read from a wrong section of the extent (unless
both the correct and incorrect ranges happen to have the same data).
So fix this by changing merge_extent_mapping() to update the extent map's
offset even if it's compressed. Also add a test case to the self tests.
This didn't happen before the patchset that does big changes in the extent
map structure (which includes the commit in the Fixes tag below) because
we kept track of the original start offset in the extent map (member
"orig_start") so we could always calculate the correct offset by
subtracting that offset from the start offset.
A test case for fstests that triggered this problem using send/receive
with compressed writes will be added soon.
Fixes: 3d2ac9922465 ("btrfs: introduce new members for extent_map")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[CORRUPTION]
There is a bug report that btrfs flips RO due to a corruption in the
extent tree, the involved dumps looks like this:
item 188 key (402811572224 168 4096) itemoff 14598 itemsize 79
extent refs 3 gen 3678544 flags 1
ref#0: extent data backref root 13835058055282163977 objectid 281473384125923 offset 81432576 count 1
ref#1: shared data backref parent 1947073626112 count 1
ref#2: shared data backref parent 1156030103552 count 1
BTRFS critical (device vdc1: state EA): unable to find ref byte nr 402811572224 parent 0 root 265 owner 28703026 offset 81432576 slot 189
BTRFS error (device vdc1: state EA): failed to run delayed ref for logical 402811572224 num_bytes 4096 type 178 action 2 ref_mod 1: -2
[CAUSE]
The corrupted entry is ref#0 of item 188.
The root number 13835058055282163977 is beyond the upper limit for root
items (the current limit is 1 << 48), and the objectid also looks
suspicious.
Only the offset and count is correct.
[ENHANCEMENT]
Although it's still unknown why we have such many bytes corrupted
randomly, we can still enhance the tree-checker for data backrefs by:
- Validate the root value
For now there should only be 3 types of roots can have data backref:
* subvolume trees
* data reloc trees
* root tree
Only for v1 space cache
- validate the objectid value
The objectid should be a valid inode number.
Hopefully we can catch such problem in the future with the new checkers.
Reported-by: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAMthOuPjg5RDT-G_LXeBBUUtzt3cq=JywF+D1_h+JYxe=WKp-Q@mail.gmail.com/#t
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently the BTRFS_MOUNT_* flags are already beyond 32 bits, this is
going to cause compilation errors for some 32 bit systems, as their
unsigned long is only 32 bits long, thus flag
BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNORESUPERFLAGS overflows and can lead to errors.
Fix the problem by:
- Migrate all existing BTRFS_MOUNT_* flags to unsigned long long
- Migrate all mount option related variables to unsigned long long
* btrfs_fs_info::mount_opt
* btrfs_fs_context::mount_opt
* mount_opt parameter of btrfs_check_options()
* old_opts parameter of btrfs_remount_begin()
* old_opts parameter of btrfs_remount_cleanup()
* mount_opt parameter of btrfs_check_mountopts_zoned()
* mount_opt and opt parameters of check_ro_option()
Fixes: 32e6216512b4 ("btrfs: introduce new "rescue=ignoresuperflags" mount option")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At add_ra_bio_pages() we are accessing the extent map to calculate
'add_size' after we dropped our reference on the extent map, resulting
in a use-after-free. Fix this by computing 'add_size' before dropping our
extent map reference.
Reported-by: syzbot+853d80cba98ce1157ae6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000038144061c6d18f2@google.com/
Fixes: 6a4049102055 ("btrfs: subpage: make add_ra_bio_pages() compatible")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we failed to link a free space entry because there's already a
conflicting entry for the same offset, we free the free space entry but
we don't free the associated bitmap that we had just allocated before.
Fix that by freeing the bitmap before freeing the entry.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Previously we had a BUG_ON() inside extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io(), as
we expected all involved folios to be still locked, thus no folio should be
missing.
However for extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io() itself, we can skip the
missing folio and handle the remaining ones, and return an error if
there is anything wrong.
Remove the BUG_ON() and let the caller to handle the error.
In the caller we do not have a quick way to cleanup the error, but all
the compression routines would handle the missing folio as an error and
properly error out, so we only need to do an ASSERT() for developers,
while for non-debug build the compression routine would handle the
error correctly.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function is only used inside inode.c by compress_file_range(),
so move it to inode.c and unexport it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Add more verbose and specific messages to all main error points in
compression code for all algorithms. Currently there's no way to know
which inode is affected or where in the data errors happened.
The messages follow a common format:
- what happened
- error code if relevant
- root and inode
- additional data like offsets or lengths
There's no helper for the messages as they differ in some details and
that would be cumbersome to generalize to a single function. As all the
errors are "almost never happens" there are the unlikely annotations
done as compression is hot path.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
KCSAN complains about a data race when accessing the last_trans field of a
root:
[ 199.553628] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_record_root_in_trans [btrfs] / record_root_in_trans [btrfs]
[ 199.555186] read to 0x000000008801e308 of 8 bytes by task 2812 on cpu 1:
[ 199.555210] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x9a/0x128 [btrfs]
[ 199.555999] start_transaction+0x154/0xcd8 [btrfs]
[ 199.556780] btrfs_join_transaction+0x44/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 199.557559] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x9c/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 199.558339] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 199.559123] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0
[ 199.559151] pipe_read+0x6a8/0x7d0
[ 199.559179] vfs_read+0x466/0x498
[ 199.559204] ksys_read+0x108/0x150
[ 199.559230] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88
[ 199.559257] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210
[ 199.559286] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0
[ 199.559318] system_call+0x70/0x98
[ 199.559431] write to 0x000000008801e308 of 8 bytes by task 2808 on cpu 0:
[ 199.559464] record_root_in_trans+0x196/0x228 [btrfs]
[ 199.560236] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xfe/0x128 [btrfs]
[ 199.561097] start_transaction+0x154/0xcd8 [btrfs]
[ 199.561927] btrfs_join_transaction+0x44/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 199.562700] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x9c/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 199.563493] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 199.564277] file_update_time+0xb8/0xf0
[ 199.564301] pipe_write+0x8ac/0xab8
[ 199.564326] vfs_write+0x33c/0x588
[ 199.564349] ksys_write+0x108/0x150
[ 199.564372] __s390x_sys_write+0x68/0x88
[ 199.564397] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210
[ 199.564424] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0
[ 199.564452] system_call+0x70/0x98
This is because we update and read last_trans concurrently without any
type of synchronization. This should be generally harmless and in the
worst case it can make us do extra locking (btrfs_record_root_in_trans())
trigger some warnings at ctree.c or do extra work during relocation - this
would probably only happen in case of load or store tearing.
So fix this by always reading and updating the field using READ_ONCE()
and WRITE_ONCE(), this silences KCSAN and prevents load and store tearing.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is only one caller utilizing the @extra_gfp parameter,
alloc_eb_folio_array(). And in that case the extra_gfp is only assigned
to __GFP_NOFAIL.
Rename the @extra_gfp parameter to @nofail to indicate that.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function btrfs_alloc_folio_array() is only utilized in
btrfs_submit_compressed_read() and no other location, and the only
caller is not utilizing the @extra_gfp parameter.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This new mount option allows the kernel to skip the super flags check,
it's mostly to allow the kernel to do a rescue mount of an interrupted
checksum conversion.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Introduce "rescue=ignoremetacsums" to ignore metadata csums, all the
other metadata sanity checks are still kept as is.
This new mount option is mostly to allow the kernel to mount an
interrupted checksum conversion (at the metadata csum overwrite stage).
And since the main part of metadata sanity checks is inside
tree-checker, we shouldn't lose much safety, and the new mount option is
rescue mount option it requires full read-only mount.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Most of the extra super block flags are beyond 32bits (from
CHANGING_FSID_V2 to CHANGING_*_CSUMS), thus using %llu is not only too
long and pretty hard to read.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The following three Opt_* enums haven't been utilized since the port to
new mount API:
- Opt_ignorebadroots
- Opt_ignoredatacsums
- Opt_rescue_all
All those enums are from the old day where we have dedicated mount
options, nowadays they have been moved to "rescue=" mount option
groups, and no more global tokens for them.
So we can safely remove them now.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is to ensure non-compressed file extents (both regular and
prealloc) should have matching ram_bytes and disk_num_bytes.
This is only for CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG and CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT case,
furthermore this will not return error, but just a kernel warning to
inform developers.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[HICCUP]
After adding extra checks on btrfs_file_extent_item::ram_bytes to
tree-checker, running fsstress leads to tree-checker warning at write time,
as we created file extent items with an invalid ram_bytes.
All those offending file extents have offset 0, and ram_bytes matching
num_bytes, and smaller than disk_num_bytes.
This would also trigger the recently enhanced btrfs-check, which catches
such mismatches and report them as minor errors.
[CAUSE]
When a folio/page is invalidated and it is part of a submitted OE, we
mark the OE truncated just to the beginning of the folio/page.
And for truncated OE, we insert the file extent item with incorrect
value for ram_bytes (using num_bytes instead of the usual value).
This is not a big deal for end users, as we do not utilize the ram_bytes
field for regular non-compressed extents.
This mismatch is just a small violation against on-disk format.
[FIX]
Fix it by removing the override on btrfs_file_extent_item::ram_bytes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Previously validate_extent_map() is only to catch bugs related to
extent_map member cleanups.
But with recent btrfs-check enhancement to catch ram_bytes mismatch with
disk_num_bytes, it would be much better to catch such extent maps
earlier.
So this patch adds extra ram_bytes validation for extent maps.
Please note that, older filesystems with such mismatch won't trigger this error:
- extent_map::ram_bytes is already fixed
Previous patch has already fixed the ram_bytes for affected file
extents.
So this enhanced sanity check should not affect end users.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[HICCUP]
Kernels can create file extent items with incorrect ram_bytes like this:
item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 32768
extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096
extent compression 0 (none)
Thankfully kernel can handle them properly, as in that case ram_bytes is
not utilized at all.
[ENHANCEMENT]
Since the hiccup is not going to cause any data-loss and is only a minor
violation of on-disk format, here we only need to ignore the incorrect
ram_bytes value, and use the correct one from
btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_num_bytes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[HICCUP]
Before commit 85de2be7129c ("btrfs: remove extent_map::block_start
member"), we utilized @bytenr variable inside
btrfs_extent_item_to_extent_map() to calculate block_start.
But that commit removed block_start completely, we have no need to
advance @bytenr at all.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Rename @bytenr as @disk_bytenr
- Only declare @disk_bytenr inside the if branch
- Make @disk_bytenr const and remove the modification on it
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's a typo in an error message when checking the block group tree
feature, it mentions fres-space-tree instead of free-space-tree. Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The direct IO code is over a thousand lines and it's currently spread
between file.c and inode.c, which makes it not easy to locate some parts
of it sometimes. Also inode.c is about 11 thousand lines and file.c about
4 thousand lines, both too big. So move all the direct IO code into a
dedicated file, so that it's easy to locate all its code and reduce the
sizes of inode.c and file.c.
This is a pure move of code without any other changes except export a
a couple functions from inode.c (get_extent_allocation_hint() and
create_io_em()) because they are used in inode.c and the new direct-io.c
file, and a couple functions from file.c (btrfs_buffered_write() and
btrfs_write_check()) because they are used both in file.c and in the new
direct-io.c file.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_set_prop() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_compress_heuristic() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that,
allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_ioctl_send() and _btrfs_ioctl_send()
as it's an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to is_data_inode() as it's an
internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items() as it's
an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items() as it's
an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Remove the encoding field from 'struct btrfs_stripe_extent'. It was
originally intended to encode the RAID type as well as if we're a data
or a parity stripe.
But the RAID type can be inferred form the block-group and the data vs.
parity differentiation can be done easier with adding a new key type
for parity stripes in the RAID stripe tree.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When debugging the recent ram_bytes mismatch bug, I can hit it with
enhanced tree-checker for file extent items at write time.
But the bug is not that easy to trigger (mostly triggered with
btrfs/06*, which uses 20 threads fsstress), and when I hit it, the only
info is the kernel leaf dump, but it doesn't include things like the
file extent type (REGULAR or PREALLOC).
Add the dump for generation and type (although only numeric output) to
make debugging a little easier.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Periodic reclaim attempts to avoid block_groups seeing active use with a
sweep mark that gets cleared on allocation and set on a sweep. In urgent
conditions where we have very little unallocated space (less than one
chunk used by the threshold calculation for the unallocated target), we
want to be able to override this mechanism.
Introduce a second pass that only happens if we fail to find a reclaim
candidate and reclaim is urgent. In that case, do a second pass where
all block groups are eligible.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Periodic reclaim runs the risk of getting stuck in a state where it
keeps reclaiming the same block group over and over. This can happen if
1. reclaiming that block_group fails
2. reclaiming that block_group fails to move any extents into existing
block_groups and just allocates a fresh chunk and moves everything.
Currently, 1. is a very tight loop inside the reclaim worker. That is
critical for edge triggered reclaim or else we risk forgetting about a
reclaimable group. On the other hand, with level triggered reclaim we
can break out of that loop and get it later.
With that fixed, 2. applies to both failures and "successes" with no
progress. If we have done a periodic reclaim on a space_info and nothing
has changed in that space_info, there is not much point to trying again,
so don't, until enough space gets free, which we capture with a
heuristic of needing to net free 1 chunk.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We currently employ a edge-triggered block group reclaim strategy which
marks block groups for reclaim as they free down past a threshold.
With a dynamic threshold, this is worse than doing it in a
level-triggered fashion periodically. That is because the reclaim
itself happens periodically, so the threshold at that point in time is
what really matters, not the threshold at freeing time. If we mark the
reclaim in a big pass, then sort by usage and do reclaim, we also
benefit from a negative feedback loop preventing unnecessary reclaims as
we crunch through the "best" candidates.
Since this is quite a different model, it requires some additional
support. The edge triggered reclaim has a good heuristic for not
reclaiming fresh block groups, so we need to replace that with a typical
GC sweep mark which skips block groups that have seen an allocation
since the last sweep.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We can currently recover allocated block_groups by:
- explicitly starting balance operations
- "auto reclaim" via bg_reclaim_threshold
The latter works by checking against a fixed threshold on frees. If we
pass from above the threshold to below, relocation triggers and the
block group will get reclaimed by the cleaner thread (assuming it is
still eligible)
Picking a threshold is challenging. Too high, and you end up trying to
reclaim very full block_groups which is quite costly, and you don't do
reclaim on block_groups that don't get quite THAT full, but could still
be quite fragmented and stranding a lot of space. Too low, and you
similarly miss out on reclaim even if you badly need it to avoid running
out of unallocated space, if you have heavily fragmented block groups
living above the threshold.
No matter the threshold, it suffers from a workload that happens to
bounce around that threshold, which can introduce arbitrary amounts of
reclaim waste.
To improve this situation, introduce a dynamic threshold. The basic idea
behind this threshold is that it should be very lax when there is plenty
of unallocated space, and increasingly aggressive as we approach zero
unallocated space. To that end, it sets a target for unallocated space
(10 chunks) and then linearly increases the threshold as the amount of
space short of the target we are increases. The formula is:
(target - unalloc) / target
I tested this by running it on three interesting workloads:
1. bounce allocations around X% full.
2. fill up all the way and introduce full fragmentation.
3. write in a fragmented way until the filesystem is just about full.
1. and 2. attack the weaknesses of a fixed threshold; fixed either works
perfectly or fully falls apart, depending on the threshold. Dynamic
always handles these cases well.
3. attacks dynamic by checking whether it is too zealous to reclaim in
conditions with low unallocated and low unused. It tends to claw back
1GiB of unallocated fairly aggressively, but not much more. Early
versions of dynamic threshold struggled on this test.
Additional work could be done to intelligently ratchet up the urgency of
reclaim in very low unallocated conditions. Existing mechanisms are
already useless in that case anyway.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is handy when computing space_info dynamic reclaim thresholds where
we do not have access to a block group. We could add it to the various
functions as a parameter, but it seems reasonable for space_info to have
an fs_info pointer.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When evaluating various reclaim strategies/thresholds against each
other, it is useful to collect data about the amount of reclaim
happening. Expose a count, error count, and byte count via sysfs
per space_info.
Note that this is only for automatic reclaim, not manually invoked
balances or other codepaths that use "relocate_block_group"
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() after btrfs_run_qgroups() fails to
update the qgroup status is probably not necessary, this would turn the
filesystem to read-only. For the same reason aborting the transaction is
also not a good option.
The state is left inconsistent and can be fixed by rescan, printing a
warning should be sufficient. Return code reflects the status of
adding/deleting the relation and if the transaction was ended properly.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's a transaction joined in the qgroup relation add/remove ioctl and
any error will lead to abort/error. We could lift the allocation from
btrfs_add_qgroup_relation() and move it outside of the transaction
context. The relation deletion does not need that.
The ownership of the structure is moved to the add relation handler.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The errors during removing a chunk item are fatal, we expect to have a
matching item in the chunk map from which the chunk_offset is taken.
Handle that by transaction abort.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The extent item used to have a v0 that was removed in 6.6. There's a
check for minimum expected size that could lead to
btrfs_handle_fs_error() that would make the filesystem read-only. As we
don't have v0 anymore (and haven't seen any reports in the deprecation
period), handle this in a less intrusive way.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When an extended ref is deleted we do a sanity check right before
removing the item, if we can't find it then handle the error. This is
done by btrfs_handle_fs_error() but this is from the time before we had
the transaction abort infrastructure, so switch to that. The end result
is the same, the error is reported and switched to read-only. We newly
return the -ENOENT error code as this better represents what happened.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We always allocate a delayed extent op structure when allocating a tree
block (except for log trees), but most of the time we don't need it as
we only need to set the BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF if we're dealing
with a relocation tree and we only need to set the key of a tree block
in a btrfs_tree_block_info structure if we are not using skinny metadata
(feature enabled by default since btrfs-progs 3.18 and available as of
kernel 3.10).
In these cases, where we don't need neither to update flags nor to set
the key, we only use the delayed extent op structure to set the tree
block's level. This is a waste of memory and besides that, the memory
allocation can fail and can add additional latency.
Instead of using a delayed extent op structure to store the level of
the tree block, use the delayed ref head to store it. This doesn't
change the size of neither structure and helps us avoid allocating
delayed extent ops structures when using the skinny metadata feature
and there's no relocation going on. This also gets rid of a BUG_ON().
For example, for a fs_mark run, with 5 iterations, 8 threads and 100K
files per iteration, before this patch there were 118109 allocations
of delayed extent op structures and after it there were none.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When qgroups are enabled, during data reservation, we allocate the
ulist_nodes that track the exact reserved extents with GFP_ATOMIC
unconditionally. This is unnecessary, and we can follow the model
already employed by the struct extent_state we preallocate in the non
qgroups case, which should reduce the risk of allocation failures with
GFP_ATOMIC.
Add a prealloc node to struct ulist which ulist_add will grab when it is
present, and try to allocate it before taking the tree lock while we can
still take advantage of a less strict gfp mask. The lifetime of that
node belongs to the new prealloc field, until it is used, at which point
it belongs to the ulist linked list.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of doing a BUG_ON() handle the error by returning -EUCLEAN,
aborting the transaction and logging an error message.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of using an if-else statement when processing the extent item at
btrfs_lookup_extent_info(), use a single if statement for the error case
since it does a goto at the end and leave the success (expected) case
following the if statement, reducing indentation and making the logic a
bit easier to follow. Also make the if statement's condition as unlikely
since it's not expected to ever happen, as it signals some corruption,
making it clear and hint the compiler to generate more efficient code.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we didn't found an extent item with the initial btrfs_search_slot()
call, it's pointless to test if the "metadata" variable is "true", because
right after we check if the key type is BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY and that
is the case only when "metadata" is set to "true". So remove the redundant
check.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
