summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-12-29bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programsKP Singh
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs. Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel objects. Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable} and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace). In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory. Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter. In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical). Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held) with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
2021-12-29net: Don't include filter.h from net/sock.hJakub Kicinski
sock.h is pretty heavily used (5k objects rebuilt on x86 after it's touched). We can drop the include of filter.h from it and add a forward declaration of struct sk_filter instead. This decreases the number of rebuilt objects when bpf.h is touched from ~5k to ~1k. There's a lot of missing includes this was masking. Primarily in networking tho, this time. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211229004913.513372-1-kuba@kernel.org
2021-05-24bpf: Fix spelling mistakesZhen Lei
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: aother ==> another Netiher ==> Neither desribe ==> describe intializing ==> initializing funciton ==> function wont ==> won't and move the word 'the' at the end to the next line accross ==> across pathes ==> paths triggerred ==> triggered excute ==> execute ether ==> either conervative ==> conservative convetion ==> convention markes ==> marks interpeter ==> interpreter Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210525025659.8898-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-02-26bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]Song Liu
BPF helpers bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] could hold two locks: bpf_local_storage_map_bucket->lock and bpf_local_storage->lock. Calling these helpers from fentry/fexit programs on functions in bpf_*_storage.c may cause deadlock on either locks. Prevent such deadlock with a per cpu counter, bpf_task_storage_busy. We need this counter to be global, because the two locks here belong to two different objects: bpf_local_storage_map and bpf_local_storage. If we pick one of them as the owner of the counter, it is still possible to trigger deadlock on the other lock. For example, if bpf_local_storage_map owns the counters, it cannot prevent deadlock on bpf_local_storage->lock when two maps are used. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210225234319.336131-3-songliubraving@fb.com
2020-08-25bpf: Split bpf_local_storage to bpf_sk_storageKP Singh
A purely mechanical change: bpf_sk_storage.c = bpf_sk_storage.c + bpf_local_storage.c bpf_sk_storage.h = bpf_sk_storage.h + bpf_local_storage.h Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200825182919.1118197-5-kpsingh@chromium.org