| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Replace a bunch of 'p->state == TASK_RUNNING' with a new helper:
task_is_running(p).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611082838.222401495@infradead.org
|
|
This commit in sched/urgent moved the cfs_rq_is_decayed() function:
a7b359fc6a37: ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
and this fresh commit in sched/core modified it in the old location:
9e077b52d86a: ("sched/pelt: Check that *_avg are null when *_sum are")
Merge the two variants.
Conflicts:
kernel/sched/fair.c
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
This is a partial forward-port of Peter Ziljstra's work first posted
at:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180530142236.667774973@infradead.org/
Currently select_idle_cpu()'s proportional scheme uses the average idle
time *for when we are idle*, that is temporally challenged. When a CPU
is not at all idle, we'll happily continue using whatever value we did
see when the CPU goes idle. To fix this, introduce a separate average
idle and age it (the existing value still makes sense for things like
new-idle balancing, which happens when we do go idle).
The overall goal is to not spend more time scanning for idle CPUs than
we're idle for. Otherwise we're inhibiting work. This means that we need to
consider the cost over all the wake-ups between consecutive idle periods.
To track this, the scan cost is subtracted from the estimated average
idle time.
The impact of this patch is related to workloads that have domains that
are fully busy or overloaded. Without the patch, the scan depth may be
too high because a CPU is not reaching idle.
Due to the nature of the patch, this is a regression magnet. It
potentially wins when domains are almost fully busy or overloaded --
at that point searches are likely to fail but idle is not being aged
as CPUs are active so search depth is too large and useless. It will
potentially show regressions when there are idle CPUs and a deep search is
beneficial. This tbench result on a 2-socket broadwell machine partially
illustates the problem
5.13.0-rc2 5.13.0-rc2
vanilla sched-avgidle-v1r5
Hmean 1 445.02 ( 0.00%) 451.36 * 1.42%*
Hmean 2 830.69 ( 0.00%) 846.03 * 1.85%*
Hmean 4 1350.80 ( 0.00%) 1505.56 * 11.46%*
Hmean 8 2888.88 ( 0.00%) 2586.40 * -10.47%*
Hmean 16 5248.18 ( 0.00%) 5305.26 * 1.09%*
Hmean 32 8914.03 ( 0.00%) 9191.35 * 3.11%*
Hmean 64 10663.10 ( 0.00%) 10192.65 * -4.41%*
Hmean 128 18043.89 ( 0.00%) 18478.92 * 2.41%*
Hmean 256 16530.89 ( 0.00%) 17637.16 * 6.69%*
Hmean 320 16451.13 ( 0.00%) 17270.97 * 4.98%*
Note that 8 was a regression point where a deeper search would have helped
but it gains for high thread counts when searches are useless. Hackbench
is a more extreme example although not perfect as the tasks idle rapidly
hackbench-process-pipes
5.13.0-rc2 5.13.0-rc2
vanilla sched-avgidle-v1r5
Amean 1 0.3950 ( 0.00%) 0.3887 ( 1.60%)
Amean 4 0.9450 ( 0.00%) 0.9677 ( -2.40%)
Amean 7 1.4737 ( 0.00%) 1.4890 ( -1.04%)
Amean 12 2.3507 ( 0.00%) 2.3360 * 0.62%*
Amean 21 4.0807 ( 0.00%) 4.0993 * -0.46%*
Amean 30 5.6820 ( 0.00%) 5.7510 * -1.21%*
Amean 48 8.7913 ( 0.00%) 8.7383 ( 0.60%)
Amean 79 14.3880 ( 0.00%) 13.9343 * 3.15%*
Amean 110 21.2233 ( 0.00%) 19.4263 * 8.47%*
Amean 141 28.2930 ( 0.00%) 25.1003 * 11.28%*
Amean 172 34.7570 ( 0.00%) 30.7527 * 11.52%*
Amean 203 41.0083 ( 0.00%) 36.4267 * 11.17%*
Amean 234 47.7133 ( 0.00%) 42.0623 * 11.84%*
Amean 265 53.0353 ( 0.00%) 47.7720 * 9.92%*
Amean 296 60.0170 ( 0.00%) 53.4273 * 10.98%*
Stddev 1 0.0052 ( 0.00%) 0.0025 ( 51.57%)
Stddev 4 0.0357 ( 0.00%) 0.0370 ( -3.75%)
Stddev 7 0.0190 ( 0.00%) 0.0298 ( -56.64%)
Stddev 12 0.0064 ( 0.00%) 0.0095 ( -48.38%)
Stddev 21 0.0065 ( 0.00%) 0.0097 ( -49.28%)
Stddev 30 0.0185 ( 0.00%) 0.0295 ( -59.54%)
Stddev 48 0.0559 ( 0.00%) 0.0168 ( 69.92%)
Stddev 79 0.1559 ( 0.00%) 0.0278 ( 82.17%)
Stddev 110 1.1728 ( 0.00%) 0.0532 ( 95.47%)
Stddev 141 0.7867 ( 0.00%) 0.0968 ( 87.69%)
Stddev 172 1.0255 ( 0.00%) 0.0420 ( 95.91%)
Stddev 203 0.8106 ( 0.00%) 0.1384 ( 82.92%)
Stddev 234 1.1949 ( 0.00%) 0.1328 ( 88.89%)
Stddev 265 0.9231 ( 0.00%) 0.0820 ( 91.11%)
Stddev 296 1.0456 ( 0.00%) 0.1327 ( 87.31%)
Again, higher thread counts benefit and the standard deviation
shows that results are also a lot more stable when the idle
time is aged.
The patch potentially matters when a socket was multiple LLCs as the
maximum search depth is lower. However, some of the test results were
suspiciously good (e.g. specjbb2005 gaining 50% on a Zen1 machine) and
other results were not dramatically different to other mcahines.
Given the nature of the patch, Peter's full series is not being forward
ported as each part should stand on its own. Preferably they would be
merged at different times to reduce the risk of false bisections.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210615111611.GH30378@techsingularity.net
|
|
Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) needs to predict the decisions made by
SchedUtil. The map_util_freq() exists to do that.
There are corner cases where the max allowed frequency might be reduced
(due to thermal). SchedUtil as a CPUFreq governor, is aware of that
but EAS is not. This patch aims to address it.
SchedUtil stores the maximum allowed frequency in
'sugov_policy::next_freq' field. EAS has to predict that value, which is
the real used frequency. That value is made after a call to
cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() which clamps to the CPUFreq policy limits.
In the existing code EAS is not able to predict that real frequency.
This leads to energy estimation errors.
To avoid wrong energy estimation in EAS (due to frequency miss prediction)
make sure that the step which calculates Performance Domain frequency,
is also aware of the allowed CPU capacity.
Furthermore, modify map_util_freq() to not extend the frequency value.
Instead, use map_util_perf() to extend the util value in both places:
SchedUtil and EAS, but for EAS clamp it to max allowed CPU capacity.
In the end, we achieve the same desirable behavior for both subsystems
and alignment in regards to the real CPU frequency.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> (For the schedutil part)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210614191238.23224-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com
|
|
Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) needs to be able to predict the frequency
requests made by the SchedUtil governor to properly estimate energy used
in the future. It has to take into account CPUs utilization and forecast
Performance Domain (PD) frequency. There is a corner case when the max
allowed frequency might be reduced due to thermal. SchedUtil is aware of
that reduced frequency, so it should be taken into account also in EAS
estimations.
SchedUtil, as a CPUFreq governor, knows the maximum allowed frequency of
a CPU, thanks to cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() and internal clamping
to 'policy::max'. SchedUtil is responsible to respect that upper limit
while setting the frequency through CPUFreq drivers. This effective
frequency is stored internally in 'sugov_policy::next_freq' and EAS has
to predict that value.
In the existing code the raw value of arch_scale_cpu_capacity() is used
for clamping the returned CPU utilization from effective_cpu_util().
This patch fixes issue with too big single CPU utilization, by introducing
clamping to the allowed CPU capacity. The allowed CPU capacity is a CPU
capacity reduced by thermal pressure raw value.
Thanks to knowledge about allowed CPU capacity, we don't get too big value
for a single CPU utilization, which is then added to the util sum. The
util sum is used as a source of information for estimating whole PD energy.
To avoid wrong energy estimation in EAS (due to capped frequency), make
sure that the calculation of util sum is aware of allowed CPU capacity.
This thermal pressure might be visible in scenarios where the CPUs are not
heavily loaded, but some other component (like GPU) drastically reduced
available power budget and increased the SoC temperature. Thus, we still
use EAS for task placement and CPUs are not over-utilized.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210614191128.22735-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com
|
|
In case the _avg delta is 0 there is no need to update se's _avg
(level n) nor cfs_rq's _avg (level n-1). These values stay the same.
Since cfs_rq's _avg isn't changed, i.e. no load is propagated down,
cfs_rq's _sum should stay the same as well.
So bail out after se's _sum has been updated.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601083616.804229-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
|
|
Check that we never break the rule that pelt's avg values are null if
pelt's sum are.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601155328.19487-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
Fix an issue where fairness is decreased since cfs_rq's can end up not
being decayed properly. For two sibling control groups with the same
priority, this can often lead to a load ratio of 99/1 (!!).
This happens because when a cfs_rq is throttled, all the descendant
cfs_rq's will be removed from the leaf list. When they initial cfs_rq
is unthrottled, it will currently only re add descendant cfs_rq's if
they have one or more entities enqueued. This is not a perfect
heuristic.
Instead, we insert all cfs_rq's that contain one or more enqueued
entities, or it its load is not completely decayed.
Can often lead to situations like this for equally weighted control
groups:
$ ps u -C stress
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 10009 88.8 0.0 3676 100 pts/1 R+ 11:04 0:13 stress --cpu 1
root 10023 3.0 0.0 3676 104 pts/1 R+ 11:04 0:00 stress --cpu 1
Fixes: 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()")
[vingo: !SMP build fix]
Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210612112815.61678-1-odin@uged.al
|
|
Revert commit 4698f88c06b8 ("sched/debug: Fix 'schedstats=enable'
cmdline option").
After commit 6041186a3258 ("init: initialize jump labels before
command line option parsing") we can rely on jump label infra being
ready for use when setup_schedstats() is called.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210602112108.1709635-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
The util_est internal UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED flag which is used to prevent
unnecessary util_est updates uses the LSB of util_est.enqueued. It is
exposed via _task_util_est() (and task_util_est()).
Commit 92a801e5d5b7 ("sched/fair: Mask UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED usages")
mentions that the LSB is lost for util_est resolution but
find_energy_efficient_cpu() checks if task_util_est() returns 0 to
return prev_cpu early.
_task_util_est() returns the max value of util_est.ewma and
util_est.enqueued or'ed w/ UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED.
So task_util_est() returning the max of task_util() and
_task_util_est() will never return 0 under the default
SCHED_FEAT(UTIL_EST, true).
To fix this use the MSB of util_est.enqueued instead and keep the flag
util_est internal, i.e. don't export it via _task_util_est().
The maximal possible util_avg value for a task is 1024 so the MSB of
'unsigned int util_est.enqueued' isn't used to store a util value.
As a caveat the code behind the util_est_se trace point has to filter
UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED to see the real util_est.enqueued value which should
be easy to do.
This also fixes an issue report by Xuewen Yan that util_est_update()
only used UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED for the subtrahend of the equation:
last_enqueued_diff = ue.enqueued - (task_util() | UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED)
Fixes: b89997aa88f0b sched/pelt: Fix task util_est update filtering
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602145808.1562603-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
|
|
Rounding in PELT calculation happening when entities are attached/detached
of a cfs_rq can result into situations where util/runnable_avg is not null
but util/runnable_sum is. This is normally not possible so we need to
ensure that util/runnable_sum stays synced with util/runnable_avg.
detach_entity_load_avg() is the last place where we don't sync
util/runnable_sum with util/runnbale_avg when moving some sched_entities
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210601085832.12626-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
Will reported that the 'XXX __migrate_task() can fail' in migration_cpu_stop()
can happen, and it *is* sort of a big deal. Looking at it some more, one
will note there is a glaring hole in the deferred CPU selection:
(w/ CONFIG_CPUSET=n, so that the affinity mask passed via taskset doesn't
get AND'd with cpu_online_mask)
$ taskset -pc 0-2 $PID
# offline CPUs 3-4
$ taskset -pc 3-5 $PID
`\
$PID may stay on 0-2 due to the cpumask_any_distribute() picking an
offline CPU and __migrate_task() refusing to do anything due to
cpu_is_allowed().
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() goes to some length to pick a dest_cpu that matches
the right constraints vs affinity and the online/active state of the
CPUs. Reuse that instead of discarding it in the affine_move_task() case.
Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210526205751.842360-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
When using something other than 8 spaces per tab, this ascii art
makes not sense, and the reader might end up wondering what this
advanced equation "is".
Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518125202.78658-4-odin@uged.al
|
|
Extend 8fb12156b8db ("init: Pin init task to the boot CPU, initially")
to cover the new PF_NO_SETAFFINITY requirement.
While there, move wait_for_completion(&kthreadd_done) into kernel_init()
to make it absolutely clear it is the very first thing done by the init
thread.
Fixes: 570a752b7a9b ("lib/smp_processor_id: Use is_percpu_thread() instead of nr_cpus_allowed")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YLS4mbKUrA3Gnb4t@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
During the update of fair blocked load (__update_blocked_fair()), we
update the contribution of the cfs in tg->load_avg if cfs_rq's pelt
has decayed. Nevertheless, the pelt values of a cfs_rq could have
been recently updated while propagating the change of a child. In this
case, cfs_rq's pelt will not decayed because it has already been
updated and we don't update tg->load_avg.
__update_blocked_fair
...
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe: child cfs_rq
update cfs_rq_load_avg() for child cfs_rq
...
update_load_avg(cfs_rq_of(se), se, 0)
...
update cfs_rq_load_avg() for parent cfs_rq
-propagation of child's load makes parent cfs_rq->load_sum
becoming null
-UPDATE_TG is not set so it doesn't update parent
cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib
..
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe: parent cfs_rq
update cfs_rq_load_avg() for parent cfs_rq
- nothing to do because parent cfs_rq has already been updated
recently so cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib is not updated
...
parent cfs_rq is decayed
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq parent cfs_rq
- but it still contibutes to tg->load_avg
we must set UPDATE_TG flags when propagting pending load to the parent
Fixes: 039ae8bcf7a5 ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing path")
Reported-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527122916.27683-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
when removing a cfs_rq from the list we only check _sum value so we must
ensure that _avg and _sum stay synced so load_sum can't be null whereas
load_avg is not after propagating load in the cgroup hierarchy.
Use load_avg to compute load_sum similarly to what is done for util_sum
and runnable_sum.
Fixes: 0e2d2aaaae52 ("sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation")
Reported-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527122916.27683-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
fair_sched_class->next no longer exists since commit:
a87e749e8fa1 ("sched: Remove struct sched_class::next field").
Now the sched_class order is specified by the linker script.
Rewrite the comment in a more generic way.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210519063709.323162-1-masahiroy@kernel.org
|
|
cpu_cgroup_css_online() calls cpu_util_update_eff() without holding the
uclamp_mutex or rcu_read_lock() like other call sites, which is
a mistake.
The uclamp_mutex is required to protect against concurrent reads and
writes that could update the cgroup hierarchy.
The rcu_read_lock() is required to traverse the cgroup data structures
in cpu_util_update_eff().
Surround the caller with the required locks and add some asserts to
better document the dependency in cpu_util_update_eff().
Fixes: 7226017ad37a ("sched/uclamp: Fix a bug in propagating uclamp value in new cgroups")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
|
|
cpu.uclamp.min is a protection as described in cgroup-v2 Resource
Distribution Model
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
which means we try our best to preserve the minimum performance point of
tasks in this group. See full description of cpu.uclamp.min in the
cgroup-v2.rst.
But the current implementation makes it a limit, which is not what was
intended.
For example:
tg->cpu.uclamp.min = 20%
p0->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 0
p1->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 50%
Previous Behavior (limit):
p0->effective_uclamp = 0
p1->effective_uclamp = 20%
New Behavior (Protection):
p0->effective_uclamp = 20%
p1->effective_uclamp = 50%
Which is inline with how protections should work.
With this change the cgroup and per-task behaviors are the same, as
expected.
Additionally, we remove the confusing relationship between cgroup and
!user_defined flag.
We don't want for example RT tasks that are boosted by default to max to
change their boost value when they attach to a cgroup. If a cgroup wants
to limit the max performance point of tasks attached to it, then
cpu.uclamp.max must be set accordingly.
Or if they want to set different boost value based on cgroup, then
sysctl_sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default must be used to NOT boost to max
and set the right cpu.uclamp.min for each group to let the RT tasks
obtain the desired boost value when attached to that group.
As it stands the dependency on !user_defined flag adds an extra layer of
complexity that is not required now cpu.uclamp.min behaves properly as
a protection.
The propagation model of effective cpu.uclamp.min in child cgroups as
implemented by cpu_util_update_eff() is still correct. The parent
protection sets an upper limit of what the child cgroups will
effectively get.
Fixes: 3eac870a3247 (sched/uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-2-qais.yousef@arm.com
|
|
For all intents and purposes, the idle task is a per-CPU kthread. It isn't
created via the same route as other pcpu kthreads however, and as a result
it is missing a few bells and whistles: it fails kthread_is_per_cpu() and
it doesn't have PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set.
Fix the former by giving the idle task a kthread struct along with the
KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU flag. This requires some extra iffery as init_idle()
call be called more than once on the same idle task.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510151024.2448573-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
There's no point doing delta==0 updates.
Suggested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
|
|
We have a mismatch between RCU and isolation -- in relation to what is
considered the maximum valid CPU number.
This matters because nohz_full= and rcu_nocbs= are joined at the hip; in
fact the former will enforce the latter. So we don't want a CPU mask to
be valid for one and denied for the other.
The difference 1st appeared as of v4.15; further details are below.
As it is confusing to anyone who isn't looking at the code regularly, a
reminder is in order; three values exist here:
CONFIG_NR_CPUS - compiled in maximum cap on number of CPUs supported.
nr_cpu_ids - possible # of CPUs (typically reflects what ACPI says)
cpus_present - actual number of present/detected/installed CPUs.
For this example, I'll refer to NR_CPUS=64 from "make defconfig" and
nr_cpu_ids=6 for ACPI reporting on a board that could run a six core,
and present=4 for a quad that is physically in the socket. From dmesg:
smpboot: Allowing 6 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs
setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:64 nr_cpumask_bits:64 nr_cpu_ids:6 nr_node_ids:1
rcu: RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=64 to nr_cpu_ids=6.
smp: Brought up 1 node, 4 CPUs
And from userspace, see:
paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat present
0-3
paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat possible
0-5
paul@trash:/sys/devices/system/cpu$ cat kernel_max
63
Everything is fine if we boot 5x5 for rcu/nohz:
Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage nohz_full=2-5 rcu_nocbs=2-5 root=/dev/sda1 ro
NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: 2-5.
rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5.
..even though there is no CPU 4 or 5. Both RCU and nohz_full are OK.
Now we push that > 6 but less than NR_CPU and with 15x15 we get:
Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage rcu_nocbs=2-15 nohz_full=2-15 root=/dev/sda1 ro
rcu: Note: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.
rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5.
These are both functionally equivalent, as we are only changing flags on
phantom CPUs that don't exist, but note the kernel interpretation changes.
And worse, it only changes for one of the two - which is the problem.
RCU doesn't care if you want to restrict the flags on phantom CPUs but
clearly nohz_full does after this change from v4.15.
edb9382175c3: ("sched/isolation: Move isolcpus= handling to the housekeeping code")
- if (cpulist_parse(str, non_housekeeping_mask) < 0) {
- pr_warn("Housekeeping: Incorrect nohz_full cpumask\n");
+ err = cpulist_parse(str, non_housekeeping_mask);
+ if (err < 0 || cpumask_last(non_housekeeping_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= or isolcpus= incorrect CPU range\n");
To be clear, the sanity check on "possible" (nr_cpu_ids) is new here.
The goal was reasonable ; not wanting housekeeping to land on a
not-possible CPU, but note two things:
1) this is an exclusion list, not an inclusion list; we are tracking
non_housekeeping CPUs; not ones who are explicitly assigned housekeeping
2) we went one further in 9219565aa890 ("sched/isolation: Require a present CPU in housekeeping mask")
- ensuring that housekeeping was sanity checking against present and not just possible CPUs.
To be clear, this means the check added in v4.15 is doubly redundant.
And more importantly, overly strict/restrictive.
We care now, because the bitmap boot arg parsing now knows that a value
of "N" is NR_CPUS; the size of the bitmap, but the bitmap code doesn't
know anything about the subtleties of our max/possible/present CPU
specifics as outlined above.
So drop the check added in v4.15 (edb9382175c3) and make RCU and
nohz_full both in alignment again on NR_CPUS so "N" works for both,
and then they can fall back to nr_cpu_ids internally just as before.
Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/bzImage nohz_full=2-N rcu_nocbs=2-N root=/dev/sda1 ro
NO_HZ: Full dynticks CPUs: 2-5.
rcu: Offload RCU callbacks from CPUs: 2-5.
As shown above, with this change, RCU and nohz_full are in sync, even
with the use of the "N" placeholder. Same result is achieved with "15".
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210419042659.1134916-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
|
|
Make:
struct dl_rq::dl_nr_migratory
struct dl_rq::dl_nr_running
struct rt_rq::rt_nr_boosted
struct rt_rq::rt_nr_migratory
struct rt_rq::rt_nr_total
struct rq::nr_uninterruptible
32-bit.
If total number of tasks can't exceed 2**32 (and less due to futex pid
limits), then per-runqueue counters can't as well.
This patchset has been sponsored by REX Prefix Eradication Society.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200228.1423391-4-adobriyan@gmail.com
|
|
Runqueue ->nr_iowait counters are 32-bit anyway.
Propagate 32-bitness into other code, but don't try too hard.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200228.1423391-3-adobriyan@gmail.com
|
|
Creating 2**32 tasks to wait in D-state is impossible and wasteful.
Return "unsigned int" and save on REX prefixes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200228.1423391-2-adobriyan@gmail.com
|
|
Creating 2**32 tasks is impossible due to futex pid limits and wasteful
anyway. Nobody has done it.
Bring nr_running() into 32-bit world to save on REX prefixes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200228.1423391-1-adobriyan@gmail.com
|
|
A few more snuck in. Also capitalize 'CPU' while at it.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
As pointed out by commit
de9b8f5dcbd9 ("sched: Fix crash trying to dequeue/enqueue the idle thread")
init_idle() can and will be invoked more than once on the same idle
task. At boot time, it is invoked for the boot CPU thread by
sched_init(). Then smp_init() creates the threads for all the secondary
CPUs and invokes init_idle() on them.
As the hotplug machinery brings the secondaries to life, it will issue
calls to idle_thread_get(), which itself invokes init_idle() yet again.
In this case it's invoked twice more per secondary: at _cpu_up(), and at
bringup_cpu().
Given smp_init() already initializes the idle tasks for all *possible*
CPUs, no further initialization should be required. Now, removing
init_idle() from idle_thread_get() exposes some interesting expectations
with regards to the idle task's preempt_count: the secondary startup always
issues a preempt_disable(), requiring some reset of the preempt count to 0
between hot-unplug and hotplug, which is currently served by
idle_thread_get() -> idle_init().
Given the idle task is supposed to have preemption disabled once and never
see it re-enabled, it seems that what we actually want is to initialize its
preempt_count to PREEMPT_DISABLED and leave it there. Do that, and remove
init_idle() from idle_thread_get().
Secondary startups were patched via coccinelle:
@begone@
@@
-preempt_disable();
...
cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512094636.2958515-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
This patch provides support for setting and copying core scheduling
'task cookies' between threads (PID), processes (TGID), and process
groups (PGID).
The value of core scheduling isn't that tasks don't share a core,
'nosmt' can do that. The value lies in exploiting all the sharing
opportunities that exist to recover possible lost performance and that
requires a degree of flexibility in the API.
From a security perspective (and there are others), the thread,
process and process group distinction is an existent hierarchal
categorization of tasks that reflects many of the security concerns
about 'data sharing'. For example, protecting against cache-snooping
by a thread that can just read the memory directly isn't all that
useful.
With this in mind, subcommands to CREATE/SHARE (TO/FROM) provide a
mechanism to create and share cookies. CREATE/SHARE_TO specify a
target pid with enum pidtype used to specify the scope of the targeted
tasks. For example, PIDTYPE_TGID will share the cookie with the
process and all of it's threads as typically desired in a security
scenario.
API:
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_GET, tgtpid, pidtype, &cookie)
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL)
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, tgtpid, pidtype, NULL)
prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_FROM, srcpid, pidtype, NULL)
where 'tgtpid/srcpid == 0' implies the current process and pidtype is
kernel enum pid_type {PIDTYPE_PID, PIDTYPE_TGID, PIDTYPE_PGID, ...}.
For return values, EINVAL, ENOMEM are what they say. ESRCH means the
tgtpid/srcpid was not found. EPERM indicates lack of PTRACE permission
access to tgtpid/srcpid. ENODEV indicates your machines lacks SMT.
[peterz: complete rewrite]
Signed-off-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123309.039845339@infradead.org
|
|
Note that sched_core_fork() is called from under tasklist_lock, and
not from sched_fork() earlier. This avoids a few races later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.980003687@infradead.org
|
|
In order to not have to use pid_struct, create a new, smaller,
structure to manage task cookies for core scheduling.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.919768100@infradead.org
|
|
- Don't migrate if there is a cookie mismatch
Load balance tries to move task from busiest CPU to the
destination CPU. When core scheduling is enabled, if the
task's cookie does not match with the destination CPU's
core cookie, this task may be skipped by this CPU. This
mitigates the forced idle time on the destination CPU.
- Select cookie matched idle CPU
In the fast path of task wakeup, select the first cookie matched
idle CPU instead of the first idle CPU.
- Find cookie matched idlest CPU
In the slow path of task wakeup, find the idlest CPU whose core
cookie matches with task's cookie
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.860083871@infradead.org
|
|
When a sibling is forced-idle to match the core-cookie; search for
matching tasks to fill the core.
rcu_read_unlock() can incur an infrequent deadlock in
sched_core_balance(). Fix this by using the RCU-sched flavor instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.800048269@infradead.org
|
|
During force-idle, we end up doing cross-cpu comparison of vruntimes
during pick_next_task. If we simply compare (vruntime-min_vruntime)
across CPUs, and if the CPUs only have 1 task each, we will always
end up comparing 0 with 0 and pick just one of the tasks all the time.
This starves the task that was not picked. To fix this, take a snapshot
of the min_vruntime when entering force idle and use it for comparison.
This min_vruntime snapshot will only be used for cross-CPU vruntime
comparison, and nothing else.
A note about the min_vruntime snapshot and force idling:
During selection:
When we're not fi, we need to update snapshot.
when we're fi and we were not fi, we must update snapshot.
When we're fi and we were already fi, we must not update snapshot.
Which gives:
fib fi update
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0
Where:
fi: force-idled now
fib: force-idled before
So the min_vruntime snapshot needs to be updated when: !(fib && fi).
Also, the cfs_prio_less() function needs to be aware of whether the
core is in force idle or not, since it will be use this information to
know whether to advance a cfs_rq's min_vruntime_fi in the hierarchy.
So pass this information along via pick_task() -> prio_less().
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.738542617@infradead.org
|
|
The rationale is as follows. In the core-wide pick logic, even if
need_sync == false, we need to go look at other CPUs (non-local CPUs)
to see if they could be running RT.
Say the RQs in a particular core look like this:
Let CFS1 and CFS2 be 2 tagged CFS tags.
Let RT1 be an untagged RT task.
rq0 rq1
CFS1 (tagged) RT1 (no tag)
CFS2 (tagged)
Say schedule() runs on rq0. Now, it will enter the above loop and
pick_task(RT) will return NULL for 'p'. It will enter the above if()
block and see that need_sync == false and will skip RT entirely.
The end result of the selection will be (say prio(CFS1) > prio(CFS2)):
rq0 rq1
CFS1 IDLE
When it should have selected:
rq0 rq1
IDLE RT
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.678425748@infradead.org
|
|
If there is only one long running local task and the sibling is
forced idle, it might not get a chance to run until a schedule
event happens on any cpu in the core.
So we check for this condition during a tick to see if a sibling
is starved and then give it a chance to schedule.
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.617407840@infradead.org
|
|
Instead of only selecting a local task, select a task for all SMT
siblings for every reschedule on the core (irrespective which logical
CPU does the reschedule).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.557559654@infradead.org
|
|
Introduce task_struct::core_cookie as an opaque identifier for core
scheduling. When enabled; core scheduling will only allow matching
task to be on the core; where idle matches everything.
When task_struct::core_cookie is set (and core scheduling is enabled)
these tasks are indexed in a second RB-tree, first on cookie value
then on scheduling function, such that matching task selection always
finds the most elegible match.
NOTE: *shudder* at the overhead...
NOTE: *sigh*, a 3rd copy of the scheduling function; the alternative
is per class tracking of cookies and that just duplicates a lot of
stuff for no raisin (the 2nd copy lives in the rt-mutex PI code).
[Joel: folded fixes]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.496975854@infradead.org
|
|
Because sched_class::pick_next_task() also implies
sched_class::set_next_task() (and possibly put_prev_task() and
newidle_balance) it is not state invariant. This makes it unsuitable
for remote task selection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[Vineeth: folded fixes]
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.437092775@infradead.org
|
|
Stuff the meat of sched_core_put() into a work such that we can use
sched_core_put() from atomic context.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.377455632@infradead.org
|
|
rq_lockp() includes a static_branch(), which is asm-goto, which is
asm volatile which defeats regular CSE. This means that:
if (!static_branch(&foo))
return simple;
if (static_branch(&foo) && cond)
return complex;
Doesn't fold and we get horrible code. Introduce __rq_lockp() without
the static_branch() on.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.316696988@infradead.org
|
|
Introduce the basic infrastructure to have a core wide rq->lock.
This relies on the rq->__lock order being in increasing CPU number
(inside a core). It is also constrained to SMT8 per lockdep (and
SMT256 per preempt_count).
Luckily SMT8 is the max supported SMT count for Linux (Mips, Sparc and
Power are known to have this).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YJUNfzSgptjX7tG6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
When switching on core-sched, CPUs need to agree which lock to use for
their RQ.
The new rule will be that rq->core_enabled will be toggled while
holding all rq->__locks that belong to a core. This means we need to
double check the rq->core_enabled value after each lock acquire and
retry if it changed.
This also has implications for those sites that take multiple RQ
locks, they need to be careful that the second lock doesn't end up
being the first lock.
Verify the lock pointer after acquiring the first lock, because if
they're on the same core, holding any of the rq->__lock instances will
pin the core state.
While there, change the rq->__lock order to CPU number, instead of rq
address, this greatly simplifies the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YJUNY0dmrJMD/BIm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
using an accessor.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.136465446@infradead.org
|
|
In prepration for playing games with rq->lock, add some rq_lock
wrappers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.075967879@infradead.org
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@digitalocean.com>
Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422123308.015639083@infradead.org
|
|
The situation around sched_info is somewhat complicated, it is used by
sched_stats and delayacct and, indirectly, kvm.
If SCHEDSTATS=Y (but disabled by default) sched_info_on() is
unconditionally true -- this is the case for all distro kernel configs
I checked.
If for some reason SCHEDSTATS=N, but TASK_DELAY_ACCT=Y, then
sched_info_on() can return false when delayacct is disabled,
presumably because there would be no other users left; except kvm is.
Instead of complicating matters further by accurately accounting
sched_stat and kvm state, simply unconditionally enable when
SCHED_INFO=Y, matching the common distro case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505111525.121458839@infradead.org
|
|
For consistency, rename {queued,dequeued} to {enqueue,dequeue}.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505111525.061402904@infradead.org
|
|
find_energy_efficient_cpu() (feec()) searches the best energy CPU
to place a task on. To do so, compute_energy() estimates the energy
impact of placing the task on a CPU, based on CPU and task utilization
signals.
Utilization signals can be concurrently updated while evaluating a
performance domain (pd). In some cases, this leads to having a
'negative delta', i.e. placing the task in the pd is seen as an
energy gain. Thus, any further energy comparison is biased.
In case of a 'negative delta', return prev_cpu since:
1. a 'negative delta' happens in less than 0.5% of feec() calls,
on a Juno with 6 CPUs (4 little, 2 big)
2. it is unlikely to have two consecutive 'negative delta' for
a task, so if the first call fails, feec() will correctly
place the task in the next feec() call
3. EAS current behavior tends to select prev_cpu if the task
doesn't raise the OPP of its current pd. prev_cpu is EAS's
generic decision
4. prev_cpu should be preferred to returning an error code.
In the latter case, select_idle_sibling() would do the placement,
selecting a big (and not energy efficient) CPU. As 3., the task
would potentially reside on the big CPU for a long time
Reported-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Suggested-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210504090743.9688-3-Pierre.Gondois@arm.com
|
