| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is a simple mechanical transformation done by:
@@
expression E;
@@
- prandom_u32_max
+ get_random_u32_below
(E)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> # for damon
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> # for infiniband
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> # for arm
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # for mmc
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Rather than incurring a division or requesting too many random bytes for
the given range, use the prandom_u32_max() function, which only takes
the minimum required bytes from the RNG and avoids divisions. This was
done mechanically with this coccinelle script:
@basic@
expression E;
type T;
identifier get_random_u32 =~ "get_random_int|prandom_u32|get_random_u32";
typedef u64;
@@
(
- ((T)get_random_u32() % (E))
+ prandom_u32_max(E)
|
- ((T)get_random_u32() & ((E) - 1))
+ prandom_u32_max(E * XXX_MAKE_SURE_E_IS_POW2)
|
- ((u64)(E) * get_random_u32() >> 32)
+ prandom_u32_max(E)
|
- ((T)get_random_u32() & ~PAGE_MASK)
+ prandom_u32_max(PAGE_SIZE)
)
@multi_line@
identifier get_random_u32 =~ "get_random_int|prandom_u32|get_random_u32";
identifier RAND;
expression E;
@@
- RAND = get_random_u32();
... when != RAND
- RAND %= (E);
+ RAND = prandom_u32_max(E);
// Find a potential literal
@literal_mask@
expression LITERAL;
type T;
identifier get_random_u32 =~ "get_random_int|prandom_u32|get_random_u32";
position p;
@@
((T)get_random_u32()@p & (LITERAL))
// Add one to the literal.
@script:python add_one@
literal << literal_mask.LITERAL;
RESULT;
@@
value = None
if literal.startswith('0x'):
value = int(literal, 16)
elif literal[0] in '123456789':
value = int(literal, 10)
if value is None:
print("I don't know how to handle %s" % (literal))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif value == 2**32 - 1 or value == 2**31 - 1 or value == 2**24 - 1 or value == 2**16 - 1 or value == 2**8 - 1:
print("Skipping 0x%x for cleanup elsewhere" % (value))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif value & (value + 1) != 0:
print("Skipping 0x%x because it's not a power of two minus one" % (value))
cocci.include_match(False)
elif literal.startswith('0x'):
coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("0x%x" % (value + 1))
else:
coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("%d" % (value + 1))
// Replace the literal mask with the calculated result.
@plus_one@
expression literal_mask.LITERAL;
position literal_mask.p;
expression add_one.RESULT;
identifier FUNC;
@@
- (FUNC()@p & (LITERAL))
+ prandom_u32_max(RESULT)
@collapse_ret@
type T;
identifier VAR;
expression E;
@@
{
- T VAR;
- VAR = (E);
- return VAR;
+ return E;
}
@drop_var@
type T;
identifier VAR;
@@
{
- T VAR;
... when != VAR
}
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> # for ext4 and sbitmap
Reviewed-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> # for drbd
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> # for s390
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # for mmc
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Add functional and performance tests for find_nth_bit().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
|
|
Currently find_first_and_bit() is an alias to find_next_and_bit(). However,
it is widely used in cpumask, so it worth to optimize it. This patch adds
its own implementation for find_first_and_bit().
On x86_64 find_bit_benchmark says:
Before (#define find_first_and_bit(...) find_next_and_bit(..., 0):
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 140.291468] find_first_and_bit: 46890919 ns, 32671 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 140.295028] find_first_and_bit: 7103 ns, 1 iterations
After:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 162.574907] find_first_and_bit: 25045813 ns, 32846 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 162.578458] find_first_and_bit: 4900 ns, 1 iterations
(Thanks to Alexey Klimov for thorough testing.)
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>
|
|
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 64 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190529141901.894819585@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Contrary to other tests, test_find_next_and_bit() test uses tab
formatting in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get().
get_cycles() is not supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better
in generic code.
Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 8545712 ns, 164399 iterations
find_last_bit: 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations
find_first_bit: 20509424 ns, 16606 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 4060016 ns, 73424 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 55984 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 19197536 ns, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 65088 ns, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 5923712 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 29088 ns, 1 iterations
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123174803.10916-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Norov, Yuri" <Yuri.Norov@cavium.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
test_find_first_bit() is intentionally sub-optimal, and may cause soft
lockup due to long time of run on some systems. So decrease length of
bitmap to traverse to avoid lockup.
With the change below, time of test execution doesn't exceed 0.2 seconds
on my testing system.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180420171949.15710-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Fixes: 4441fca0a27f5 ("lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions")
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
As suggested in review comments:
* printk: align numbers using whitespaces instead of tabs;
* return error value from init() to avoid calling rmmod if testing again;
* use ktime_get instead of get_cycles as some arches don't support it;
The output in dmesg (on QEMU arm64):
[ 38.823430] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 38.845358] find_next_bit: 20138448 ns, 163968 iterations
[ 38.856217] find_next_zero_bit: 10615328 ns, 163713 iterations
[ 38.863564] find_last_bit: 7111888 ns, 163967 iterations
[ 40.944796] find_first_bit: 2081007216 ns, 163968 iterations
[ 40.944975]
[ 40.944975] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 40.945268] find_next_bit: 73216 ns, 656 iterations
[ 40.967858] find_next_zero_bit: 22461008 ns, 327025 iterations
[ 40.968047] find_last_bit: 62320 ns, 656 iterations
[ 40.978060] find_first_bit: 9889360 ns, 656 iterations
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171124143040.a44jvhmnaiyedg2i@yury-thinkpad
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
As suggested in review comments, rename test_find_bit.c to
find_bit_benchmark.c.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171124143040.a44jvhmnaiyedg2i@yury-thinkpad
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
