summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-12-10Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== bpf-next 2021-12-10 v2 We've added 115 non-merge commits during the last 26 day(s) which contain a total of 182 files changed, 5747 insertions(+), 2564 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Various samples fixes, from Alexander Lobakin. 2) BPF CO-RE support in kernel and light skeleton, from Alexei Starovoitov. 3) A batch of new unified APIs for libbpf, logging improvements, version querying, etc. Also a batch of old deprecations for old APIs and various bug fixes, in preparation for libbpf 1.0, from Andrii Nakryiko. 4) BPF documentation reorganization and improvements, from Christoph Hellwig and Dave Tucker. 5) Support for declarative initialization of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY in libbpf, from Hengqi Chen. 6) Verifier log fixes, from Hou Tao. 7) Runtime-bounded loops support with bpf_loop() helper, from Joanne Koong. 8) Extend branch record capturing to all platforms that support it, from Kajol Jain. 9) Light skeleton codegen improvements, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 10) bpftool doc-generating script improvements, from Quentin Monnet. 11) Two libbpf v0.6 bug fixes, from Shuyi Cheng and Vincent Minet. 12) Deprecation warning fix for perf/bpf_counter, from Song Liu. 13) MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT unification and MIPS build fix for libbpf, from Tiezhu Yang. 14) BTF_KING_TYPE_TAG follow-up fixes, from Yonghong Song. 15) Selftests fixes and improvements, from Ilya Leoshkevich, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jiri Olsa, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Tirthendu Sarkar, Yucong Sun, and others. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (115 commits) libbpf: Add "bool skipped" to struct bpf_map libbpf: Fix typo in btf__dedup@LIBBPF_0.0.2 definition bpftool: Switch bpf_object__load_xattr() to bpf_object__load() selftests/bpf: Remove the only use of deprecated bpf_object__load_xattr() selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behavior selftests/bpf: Replace all uses of bpf_load_btf() with bpf_btf_load() libbpf: Deprecate bpf_object__load_xattr() libbpf: Add per-program log buffer setter and getter libbpf: Preserve kernel error code and remove kprobe prog type guessing libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading libbpf: Allow passing user log setting through bpf_object_open_opts libbpf: Allow passing preallocated log_buf when loading BTF into kernel libbpf: Add OPTS-based bpf_btf_load() API libbpf: Fix bpf_prog_load() log_buf logic for log_level 0 samples/bpf: Remove unneeded variable bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t selftests/bpf: Fix a compilation warning perf/bpf_counter: Use bpf_map_create instead of bpf_create_map samples: bpf: Fix 'unknown warning group' build warning on Clang samples: bpf: Fix xdp_sample_user.o linking with Clang ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210234746.2100561-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-10selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behaviorAndrii Nakryiko
Add a selftest that validates that per-program and per-object log_buf overrides work as expected. Also test same logic for low-level bpf_prog_load() and bpf_btf_load() APIs. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211209193840.1248570-11-andrii@kernel.org
2021-12-02selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocations to verifier scale test.Alexei Starovoitov
Add 182 CO-RE relocations to verifier scale test. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-18-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-12-02selftests/bpf: Revert CO-RE removal in test_ksyms_weak.Alexei Starovoitov
The commit 087cba799ced ("selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton") added test_ksyms_weak to light skeleton testing, but remove CO-RE access. Revert that part of commit, since light skeleton can use CO-RE in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-17-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-12-02selftests/bpf: Additional test for CO-RE in the kernel.Alexei Starovoitov
Add a test where randmap() function is appended to three different bpf programs. That action checks struct bpf_core_relo replication logic and offset adjustment in gen loader part of libbpf. Fourth bpf program has 360 CO-RE relocations from vmlinux, bpf_testmod, and non-existing type. It tests candidate cache logic. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-16-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-12-02selftests/bpf: Improve inner_map test coverage.Alexei Starovoitov
Check that hash and array inner maps are properly initialized. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-14-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-11-30selftest/bpf/benchs: Add bpf_loop benchmarkJoanne Koong
Add benchmark to measure the throughput and latency of the bpf_loop call. Testing this on my dev machine on 1 thread, the data is as follows: nr_loops: 10 bpf_loop - throughput: 198.519 ± 0.155 M ops/s, latency: 5.037 ns/op nr_loops: 100 bpf_loop - throughput: 247.448 ± 0.305 M ops/s, latency: 4.041 ns/op nr_loops: 500 bpf_loop - throughput: 260.839 ± 0.380 M ops/s, latency: 3.834 ns/op nr_loops: 1000 bpf_loop - throughput: 262.806 ± 0.629 M ops/s, latency: 3.805 ns/op nr_loops: 5000 bpf_loop - throughput: 264.211 ± 1.508 M ops/s, latency: 3.785 ns/op nr_loops: 10000 bpf_loop - throughput: 265.366 ± 3.054 M ops/s, latency: 3.768 ns/op nr_loops: 50000 bpf_loop - throughput: 235.986 ± 20.205 M ops/s, latency: 4.238 ns/op nr_loops: 100000 bpf_loop - throughput: 264.482 ± 0.279 M ops/s, latency: 3.781 ns/op nr_loops: 500000 bpf_loop - throughput: 309.773 ± 87.713 M ops/s, latency: 3.228 ns/op nr_loops: 1000000 bpf_loop - throughput: 262.818 ± 4.143 M ops/s, latency: 3.805 ns/op >From this data, we can see that the latency per loop decreases as the number of loops increases. On this particular machine, each loop had an overhead of about ~4 ns, and we were able to run ~250 million loops per second. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-5-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-11-30selftests/bpf: Measure bpf_loop verifier performanceJoanne Koong
This patch tests bpf_loop in pyperf and strobemeta, and measures the verifier performance of replacing the traditional for loop with bpf_loop. The results are as follows: ~strobemeta~ Baseline verification time 6808200 usec stack depth 496 processed 554252 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 16 total_states 15878 peak_states 13489 mark_read 3110 #192 verif_scale_strobemeta:OK (unrolled loop) Using bpf_loop verification time 31589 usec stack depth 96+400 processed 1513 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 2 total_states 106 peak_states 106 mark_read 60 #193 verif_scale_strobemeta_bpf_loop:OK ~pyperf600~ Baseline verification time 29702486 usec stack depth 368 processed 626838 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 7 total_states 30368 peak_states 30279 mark_read 748 #182 verif_scale_pyperf600:OK (unrolled loop) Using bpf_loop verification time 148488 usec stack depth 320+40 processed 10518 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 10 total_states 705 peak_states 517 mark_read 38 #183 verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop:OK Using the bpf_loop helper led to approximately a 99% decrease in the verification time and in the number of instructions. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-4-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-11-30selftests/bpf: Add bpf_loop testJoanne Koong
Add test for bpf_loop testing a variety of cases: various nr_loops, null callback ctx, invalid flags, nested callbacks. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-3-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-11-28selftests/bpf: Test BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY static initializationHengqi Chen
Add testcase for BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY static initialization. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211128141633.502339-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-11-26af_unix: Remove UNIX_ABSTRACT() macro and test sun_path[0] instead.Kuniyuki Iwashima
In BSD and abstract address cases, we store sockets in the hash table with keys between 0 and UNIX_HASH_SIZE - 1. However, the hash saved in a socket varies depending on its address type; sockets with BSD addresses always have UNIX_HASH_SIZE in their unix_sk(sk)->addr->hash. This is just for the UNIX_ABSTRACT() macro used to check the address type. The difference of the saved hashes comes from the first byte of the address in the first place. So, we can test it directly. Then we can keep a real hash in each socket and replace unix_table_lock with per-hash locks in the later patch. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-11-25selftests/bpf: Mix legacy (maps) and modern (vars) BPF in one testAndrii Nakryiko
Add selftest that combines two BPF programs within single BPF object file such that one of the programs is using global variables, but can be skipped at runtime on old kernels that don't support global data. Another BPF program is written with the goal to be runnable on very old kernels and only relies on explicitly accessed BPF maps. Such test, run against old kernels (e.g., libbpf CI will run it against 4.9 kernel that doesn't support global data), allows to test the approach and ensure that libbpf doesn't make unnecessary assumption about necessary kernel features. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211123200105.387855-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-23dccp/tcp: Remove an unused argument in inet_csk_listen_start().Kuniyuki Iwashima
The commit 1295e2cf3065 ("inet: minor optimization for backlog setting in listen(2)") added change so that sk_max_ack_backlog is initialised earlier in inet_dccp_listen() and inet_listen(). Since then, we no longer use backlog in inet_csk_listen_start(), so let's remove it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Sailer <richard_siegfried@systemli.org> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-11-18Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-11-16selftests/bpf: Add uprobe triggering overhead benchmarksAndrii Nakryiko
Add benchmark to measure overhead of uprobes and uretprobes. Also have a baseline (no uprobe attached) benchmark. On my dev machine, baseline benchmark can trigger 130M user_target() invocations. When uprobe is attached, this falls to just 700K. With uretprobe, we get down to 520K: $ sudo ./bench trig-uprobe-base -a Summary: hits 131.289 ± 2.872M/s # UPROBE $ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-without-nop Summary: hits 0.729 ± 0.007M/s $ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-with-nop Summary: hits 1.798 ± 0.017M/s # URETPROBE $ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-without-nop Summary: hits 0.508 ± 0.012M/s $ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-with-nop Summary: hits 0.883 ± 0.008M/s So there is almost 2.5x performance difference between probing nop vs non-nop instruction for entry uprobe. And 1.7x difference for uretprobe. This means that non-nop uprobe overhead is around 1.4 microseconds for uprobe and 2 microseconds for non-nop uretprobe. For nop variants, uprobe and uretprobe overhead is down to 0.556 and 1.13 microseconds, respectively. For comparison, just doing a very low-overhead syscall (with no BPF programs attached anywhere) gives: $ sudo ./bench trig-base -a Summary: hits 4.830 ± 0.036M/s So uprobes are about 2.67x slower than pure context switch. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116013041.4072571-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-15selftests/bpf: Add tests for restricted helpersDmitrii Banshchikov
This patch adds tests that bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns(), bpf_timer_* and bpf_spin_lock()/bpf_spin_unlock() helpers are forbidden in tracing progs as their use there may result in various locking issues. Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211113142227.566439-3-me@ubique.spb.ru
2021-11-15Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-15 We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 13 day(s) which contain a total of 171 files changed, 2728 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add btf_type_tag attributes to bring kernel annotations like __user/__rcu to BTF such that BPF verifier will be able to detect misuse, from Yonghong Song. 2) Big batch of libbpf improvements including various fixes, future proofing APIs, and adding a unified, OPTS-based bpf_prog_load() low-level API, from Andrii Nakryiko. 3) Add ingress_ifindex to BPF_SK_LOOKUP program type for selectively applying the programmable socket lookup logic to packets from a given netdev, from Mark Pashmfouroush. 4) Remove the 128M upper JIT limit for BPF programs on arm64 and add selftest to ensure exception handling still works, from Russell King and Alan Maguire. 5) Add a new bpf_find_vma() helper for tracing to map an address to the backing file such as shared library, from Song Liu. 6) Batch of various misc fixes to bpftool, fixing a memory leak in BPF program dump, updating documentation and bash-completion among others, from Quentin Monnet. 7) Deprecate libbpf bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear() API and migrate its users as the API is heavily tailored around perf and is non-generic, from Dave Marchevsky. 8) Enable libbpf's strict mode by default in bpftool and add a --legacy option as an opt-out for more relaxed BPF program requirements, from Stanislav Fomichev. 9) Fix bpftool to use libbpf_get_error() to check for errors, from Hengqi Chen. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (72 commits) bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error bpftool: Fix mixed indentation in documentation bpftool: Update the lists of names for maps and prog-attach types bpftool: Fix indent in option lists in the documentation bpftool: Remove inclusion of utilities.mak from Makefiles bpftool: Fix memory leak in prog_dump() selftests/bpf: Fix a tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare compiler warning selftests/bpf: Fix an unused-but-set-variable compiler warning bpf: Introduce btf_tracing_ids bpf: Extend BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL with parameter for number of IDs bpftool: Enable libbpf's strict mode by default docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG support selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with btf_tag selftest selftests/bpf: Add a C test for btf_type_tag selftests/bpf: Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG for deduplication selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG unit tests selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_type_tag() bpftool: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG libbpf: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115162008.25916-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-11-11selftests/bpf: Add a C test for btf_type_tagYonghong Song
The following is the main btf_type_tag usage in the C test: #define __tag1 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) #define __tag2 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) struct btf_type_tag_test { int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *p; } g; The bpftool raw dump with related types: [4] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED [11] STRUCT 'btf_type_tag_test' size=8 vlen=1 'p' type_id=14 bits_offset=0 [12] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=16 [13] TYPE_TAG 'tag2' type_id=12 [14] PTR '(anon)' type_id=13 [15] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=4 [16] PTR '(anon)' type_id=15 [17] VAR 'g' type_id=11, linkage=global With format C dump, we have struct btf_type_tag_test { int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) * __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) *p; }; The result C code is identical to the original definition except macro's are gone. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012646.1508231-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-11-11selftests/bpf: Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.cYonghong Song
Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c so we can introduce progs/btf_type_tag.c in the next patch. Also create a subtest for btf_decl_tag in prog_tests/btf_tag.c so we can introduce btf_type_tag subtest in the next patch. I also took opportunity to remove the check whether __has_attribute is defined or not in progs/btf_decl_tag.c since all recent clangs should already support this macro. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012641.1507144-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-11-10selftests/bpf: Add tests for accessing ingress_ifindex in bpf_sk_lookupMark Pashmfouroush
A new field was added to the bpf_sk_lookup data that users can access. Add tests that validate that the new ingress_ifindex field contains the right data. Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-3-markpash@cloudflare.com
2021-11-08selftests/bpf: Add exception handling selftests for tp_bpf programAlan Maguire
Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and execution of the BPF program progresses. To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and task_works->func are 0. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
2021-11-07selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_find_vmaSong Liu
Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program, on the other hand, does not have this constraint. Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback function. The verifier should reject both cases. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-11-07selftests/bpf: Use explicit bpf_prog_test_load() calls everywhereAndrii Nakryiko
-Dbpf_prog_load_deprecated=bpf_prog_test_load trick is both ugly and breaks when deprecation goes into effect due to macro magic. Convert all the uses to explicit bpf_prog_test_load() calls which avoid deprecation errors and makes everything less magical. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-12-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-07selftests/bpf: Fix non-strict SEC() program sectionsAndrii Nakryiko
Fix few more SEC() definitions that were previously missed. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-9-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-06bpf: selftest: Trigger a DCE on the whole subprogMartin KaFai Lau
This patch adds a test to trigger the DCE to remove the whole subprog to ensure the verifier does not depend on a stable subprog index. The DCE is done by testing a global const. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211106014020.651638-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for 64-bit bounds propagation issue.Alexei Starovoitov
./test_progs-no_alu32 -vv -t twfw Before the 64-bit_into_32-bit fix: 19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0xff),s32_max_value=255,u32_max_value=255) and eventually: invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=7 size=8 R6 max value is outside of the allowed memory range libbpf: failed to load object 'no_alu32/twfw.o' After the fix: 19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) verif_twfw:OK Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftestAndrii Nakryiko
Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries. While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests. Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests pass. Fixes: 0133c20480b1 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops progHou Tao
Running a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog for dummy_st_ops::test_N() through bpf_prog_test_run(). Four test cases are added: (1) attach dummy_st_ops should fail (2) function return value of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() is expected (3) pointer argument of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() works as expected (4) multiple arguments passed to bpf_dummy_ops::test_2() are correct Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-5-houtao1@huawei.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regressionAndrii Nakryiko
After most recent nightly Clang update strobemeta selftests started failing with the following error (relevant portion of assembly included): 1624: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 1625: (bf) r1 = r0 1626: (18) r2 = 0xfffffffe 1628: (5f) r1 &= r2 1629: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+7 1630: (07) r9 += 104 1631: (6b) *(u16 *)(r9 +0) = r0 1632: (67) r0 <<= 32 1633: (77) r0 >>= 32 1634: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1635: (0f) r1 += r0 1636: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -456) = r1 1637: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -368) 1638: (c5) if r1 s< 0x1 goto pc+778 1639: (bf) r6 = r8 1640: (0f) r6 += r7 1641: (b4) w1 = 0 1642: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +108) = r1 1643: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r10 -352) 1644: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1645: (bf) r1 = r9 1646: (b4) w2 = 1 1647: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 R1 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access In the above code r0 and r1 are implicitly related. Clang knows that, but verifier isn't able to infer this relationship. Yonghong Song narrowed down this "regression" in code generation to a recent Clang optimization change ([0]), which for BPF target generates code pattern that BPF verifier can't handle and loses track of register boundaries. This patch works around the issue by adding an BPF assembly-based helper that helps to prove to the verifier that upper bound of the register is a given constant by controlling the exact share of generated BPF instruction sequence. This fixes the immediate issue for strobemeta selftest. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acabad9ff6bf13e00305d9d8621ee8eafc1f8b08 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029182907.166910-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeletonKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet. Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them together. In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"), I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of subtests. Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using light skeleton, and convert all existing users. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28bpf/benchs: Add benchmark tests for bloom filter throughput + false positiveJoanne Koong
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates) and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks. These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases, the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases. >From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates are roughly as follows: 1 hash function = ~30% 2 hash functions = ~15% 3 hash functions = ~5% 4 hash functions = ~2.5% 5 hash functions = ~1% 6 hash functions = ~0.5% 7 hash functions = ~0.35% 8 hash functions = ~0.15% 9 hash functions = ~0.1% 10 hash functions = ~0% For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte values are as follows: 1 hash function: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations Updates - 33.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.15% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations Updates - 15.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.2% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations Updates - 33.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.04% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.06% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations Updates - 33.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.42% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations Updates - 32.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations Updates - 13.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.58% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations Updates - 31.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.94% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations Updates - 13.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.95% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations Updates - 28.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 31.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations Updates - 11.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.98% 2 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations Updates - 20.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.21% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.19% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.54% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations Updates - 7.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.52% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations Updates - 16.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.77% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations Updates - 6.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.88% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations Updates - 14.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 3 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.65% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.58% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations Updates - 14.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.71% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.3 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.62% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations Updates - 13.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.62% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations Updates - 4.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.7% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations Updates - 12.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.60% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations Updates - 4.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.69% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.49% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations Updates - 4.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.41% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations Updates - 9.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.54% 4 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations Updates - 11.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations Updates - 4.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations Updates - 10.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.97% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations Updates - 9.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations Updates - 3.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.91% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations Updates - 3.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.78% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.93% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.39% 5 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations Updates - 9.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.77% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations Updates - 9.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.79% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations Updates - 8.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.82% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations Updates - 3.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.78% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations Updates - 7.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.81% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.80% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations Updates - 5.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.29% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.28% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations Updates - 5.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add bloom filter map test casesJoanne Koong
This patch adds test cases for bpf bloom filter maps. They include tests checking against invalid operations by userspace, tests for using the bloom filter map as an inner map, and a bpf program that queries the bloom filter map for values added by a userspace program. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-4-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich
This is the same as commit d164dd9a5c08 ("selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines"), but for test_core_reloc_mods. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-7-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG typedef example in tag.cYonghong Song
Change value type in progs/tag.c to a typedef with a btf_decl_tag. With `bpftool btf dump file tag.o`, we have ... [14] TYPEDEF 'value_t' type_id=17 [15] DECL_TAG 'tag1' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [16] DECL_TAG 'tag2' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [17] STRUCT '(anon)' size=8 vlen=2 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 ... The btf_tag selftest also succeeded: $ ./test_progs -t tag #21 btf_tag:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195643.4020315-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Make perf_buffer selftests work on 4.9 kernel againAndrii Nakryiko
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]): libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this. For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because global data isn't yet supported there. Fixes: aa274f98b269 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Demonstrate use of custom .rodata/.data sectionsAndrii Nakryiko
Enhance existing selftests to demonstrate the use of custom .data/.rodata sections. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021014404.2635234-9-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer testJiri Olsa
The perf buffer tests triggers trace with nanosleep syscall, but monitors all syscalls, which results in lot of data in the buffer and makes it harder to debug. Let's lower the trace traffic and monitor just nanosleep syscall. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-4-jolsa@kernel.org
2021-10-21selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock() helperHengqi Chen
Add a new test which triggers unix_listen kernel function to test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock helper. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021134752.1223426-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-10-18bpf: Rename BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAGYonghong Song
Patch set [1] introduced BTF_KIND_TAG to allow tagging declarations for struct/union, struct/union field, var, func and func arguments and these tags will be encoded into dwarf. They are also encoded to btf by llvm for the bpf target. After BTF_KIND_TAG is introduced, we intended to use it for kernel __user attributes. But kernel __user is actually a type attribute. Upstream and internal discussion showed it is not a good idea to mix declaration attribute and type attribute. So we proposed to introduce btf_type_tag as a type attribute and existing btf_tag renamed to btf_decl_tag ([2]). This patch renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG and some other declarations with *_tag to *_decl_tag to make it clear the tag is for declaration. In the future, BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG might be introduced per [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223004.244411-1-yhs@fb.com/ [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199 Fixes: b5ea834dde6b ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5b84bd10363e ("libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5c07f2fec003 ("bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012164838.3345699-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix pid check in fexit_sleep testYucong Sun
bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() returns u64, whose upper 32 bits are the same as userspace getpid() return value. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-13-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for atomics testYucong Sun
This make atomics test able to run in parallel with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Make cgroup_v1v2 use its own portYucong Sun
This patch change cgroup_v1v2 use a different port, avoid conflict with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-8-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix race condition in enable_statsYucong Sun
In parallel execution mode, this test now need to use atomic operation to avoid race condition. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-7-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08bpf/selftests: Add test for writable bare tracepointHou Tao
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod with a specific buffer length. The reading will return the value in writable context if the early return flag is enabled in writable context. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump test under new clangYucong Sun
New clang version changed ([0]) type name in dwarf from "long int" to "long", this is causing btf_dump tests to fail. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f6a561c4d6754b13165a49990e8365d819f64c86 Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211008173139.1457407-1-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-07selftests/bpf: Remove SEC("version") from test progsDave Marchevsky
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version being set, have been unnecessary. Remove them so that it's obvious to folks using selftests as a guide that "modern" BPF progs don't need this section. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007231234.2223081-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
2021-10-06selftest/bpf: Switch recursion test to use htab_map_delete_elemJiri Olsa
Currently the recursion test is hooking __htab_map_lookup_elem function, which is invoked both from bpf_prog and bpf syscall. But in our kernel build, the __htab_map_lookup_elem gets inlined within the htab_map_lookup_elem, so it's not trigered and the test fails. Fixing this by using htab_map_delete_elem, which is not inlined for bpf_prog calls (like htab_map_lookup_elem is) and is used directly as pointer for map_delete_elem, so it won't disappear by inlining. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava
2021-10-05bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc supportKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod. This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-01selftests/bpf: Use BTF-defined key/value for map definitionsHengqi Chen
Change map definitions in BPF selftests to use BTF-defined key/value types. This unifies the map definitions and ensures libbpf won't emit warning about retrying map creation. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930161456.3444544-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Fix probe_user test failure with clang build kernelYonghong Song
clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user. $ ./test_progs -t probe_user $ ... $ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec $ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0 $ #94 probe_user:FAIL The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen) { ...... } ... SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr, int, addrlen) { return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen); } The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program is not triggered. To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have to be handled specially. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210929033000.3711921-1-yhs@fb.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 (git 2.51.1) at 2025-11-01 22:25:13 +0000