From df561f6688fef775baa341a0f5d960becd248b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:36:59 -0500 Subject: treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c | 4 ++-- drivers/nfc/st21nfca/dep.c | 2 +- drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/nfc') diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c index 346e084387f7..f7464bd6d57c 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static int pn533_transceive(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, break; } - /* fall through */ + fallthrough; default: /* jumbo frame ? */ if (skb->len > PN533_CMD_DATAEXCH_DATA_MAXLEN) { @@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ static void pn533_wq_mi_recv(struct work_struct *work) break; } - /* fall through */ + fallthrough; default: skb_put_u8(skb, 1); /*TG*/ diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/dep.c b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/dep.c index 0b9ca6d20ffa..8874d605b14f 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/dep.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/dep.c @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static void st21nfca_im_recv_dep_res_cb(void *context, struct sk_buff *skb, switch (ST21NFCA_NFC_DEP_PFB_TYPE(dep_res->pfb)) { case ST21NFCA_NFC_DEP_PFB_ACK_NACK_PDU: pr_err("Received a ACK/NACK PDU\n"); - /* fall through */ + fallthrough; case ST21NFCA_NFC_DEP_PFB_I_PDU: info->dep_info.curr_nfc_dep_pni = ST21NFCA_NFC_DEP_PFB_PNI(dep_res->pfb + 1); diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c index e46adaac1c63..3bd97c73f983 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int trf7970a_switch_rf(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, bool on) dev_err(trf->dev, "%s - Invalid request: %d %d\n", __func__, trf->state, on); ret = -EINVAL; - /* FALLTHROUGH */ + fallthrough; case TRF7970A_ST_IDLE: case TRF7970A_ST_IDLE_RX_BLOCKED: case TRF7970A_ST_WAIT_FOR_RX_DATA: @@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ static void trf7970a_shutdown(struct trf7970a *trf) case TRF7970A_ST_WAIT_TO_ISSUE_EOF: case TRF7970A_ST_LISTENING: trf7970a_send_err_upstream(trf, -ECANCELED); - /* FALLTHROUGH */ + fallthrough; case TRF7970A_ST_IDLE: case TRF7970A_ST_IDLE_RX_BLOCKED: trf7970a_switch_rf_off(trf); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dinghao Liu Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:23:43 +0800 Subject: NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails. Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/nfc') diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c index 9642971e89ce..457854765983 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock); if (rc) { WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n"); - return rc; + goto free_skb_resp; } rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data, -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2