From c92688cac239794e4a1d976afa5203a4d3a2ac0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Blumenstingl Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 23:46:26 +0100 Subject: regulator: pwm-regulator: Add validity checks in continuous .get_voltage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Continuous regulators can be configured to operate only in a certain duty cycle range (for example from 0..91%). Add a check to error out if the duty cycle translates to an unsupported (or out of range) voltage. Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240113224628.377993-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index 698c420e0869..226ca4c62673 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev) pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate); voltage = pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&pstate, duty_unit); + if (voltage < min(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty) || + voltage > max(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty)) + return -ENOTRECOVERABLE; /* * The dutycycle for min_uV might be greater than the one for max_uV. -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From 6a7d11efd6915d80a025f2a0be4ae09d797b91ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Blumenstingl Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 23:46:27 +0100 Subject: regulator: pwm-regulator: Calculate the output voltage for disabled PWMs If a PWM output is disabled then it's voltage has to be calculated based on a zero duty cycle (for normal polarity) or duty cycle being equal to the PWM period (for inverted polarity). Add support for this to pwm_regulator_get_voltage(). Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240113224628.377993-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index 226ca4c62673..d27b9a7a30c9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -157,6 +157,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev) pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate); + if (!pstate.enabled) { + if (pstate.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) + pstate.duty_cycle = pstate.period; + else + pstate.duty_cycle = 0; + } + voltage = pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&pstate, duty_unit); if (voltage < min(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty) || voltage > max(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty)) -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 From b3cbdcc191819b75c04178142e2d0d4c668f68c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Blumenstingl Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 23:46:28 +0100 Subject: regulator: pwm-regulator: Manage boot-on with disabled PWM channels Odroid-C1 uses a Monolithic Power Systems MP2161 controlled via PWM for the VDDEE voltage supply of the Meson8b SoC. Commit 6b9352f3f8a1 ("pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state") results in my Odroid-C1 crashing with memory corruption in many different places (seemingly at random). It turns out that this is due to a currently not supported corner case. The VDDEE regulator can generate between 860mV (duty cycle of ~91%) and 1140mV (duty cycle of 0%). We consider it to be enabled by the bootloader (which is why it has the regulator-boot-on flag in .dts) as well as being always-on (which is why it has the regulator-always-on flag in .dts) because the VDDEE voltage is generally required for the Meson8b SoC to work. The public S805 datasheet [0] states on page 17 (where "A5" refers to the Cortex-A5 CPU cores): [...] So if EE domains is shut off, A5 memory is also shut off. That does not matter. Before EE power domain is shut off, A5 should be shut off at first. It turns out that at least some bootloader versions are keeping the PWM output disabled. This is not a problem due to the specific design of the regulator: when the PWM output is disabled the output pin is pulled LOW, effectively achieving a 0% duty cycle (which in return means that VDDEE voltage is at 1140mV). The problem comes when the pwm-regulator driver tries to initialize the PWM output. To do so it reads the current state from the hardware, which is: period: 3666ns duty cycle: 3333ns (= ~91%) enabled: false Then those values are translated using the continuous voltage range to 860mV. Later, when the regulator is being enabled (either by the regulator core due to the always-on flag or first consumer - in this case the lima driver for the Mali-450 GPU) the pwm-regulator driver tries to keep the voltage (at 860mV) and just enable the PWM output. This is when things start to go wrong as the typical voltage used for VDDEE is 1100mV. Commit 6b9352f3f8a1 ("pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state") triggers above condition as before that change period and duty cycle were both at 0. Since the change to the pwm-meson driver is considered correct the solution is to be found in the pwm-regulator driver. Update the duty cycle during driver probe if the regulator is flagged as boot-on so that a call to pwm_regulator_enable() (by the regulator core during initialization of a regulator flagged with boot-on) without any preceding call to pwm_regulator_set_voltage() does not change the output voltage. [0] https://dn.odroid.com/S805/Datasheet/S805_Datasheet%20V0.8%2020150126.pdf Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl Link: https://msgid.link/r/20240113224628.377993-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c') diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index d27b9a7a30c9..60cfcd741c2a 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -323,6 +323,32 @@ static int pwm_regulator_init_continuous(struct platform_device *pdev, return 0; } +static int pwm_regulator_init_boot_on(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata, + const struct regulator_init_data *init_data) +{ + struct pwm_state pstate; + + if (!init_data->constraints.boot_on || drvdata->enb_gpio) + return 0; + + pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate); + if (pstate.enabled) + return 0; + + /* + * Update the duty cycle so the output does not change + * when the regulator core enables the regulator (and + * thus the PWM channel). + */ + if (pstate.polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) + pstate.duty_cycle = pstate.period; + else + pstate.duty_cycle = 0; + + return pwm_apply_might_sleep(drvdata->pwm, &pstate); +} + static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { const struct regulator_init_data *init_data; @@ -382,6 +408,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) return ret; + ret = pwm_regulator_init_boot_on(pdev, drvdata, init_data); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to apply boot_on settings: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &drvdata->desc, &config); if (IS_ERR(regulator)) { -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2