From 1712c20dae7b770b62b2e3272100b3b40af0157c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:59:04 -0400 Subject: bad_inode_permission() is safe from RCU mode return -EIO; is *not* a blocking operation, thank you very much. Nick, what the hell have you been smoking? Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/bad_inode.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/bad_inode.c') diff --git a/fs/bad_inode.c b/fs/bad_inode.c index 9ad2369d9e35..bfcb18feb1df 100644 --- a/fs/bad_inode.c +++ b/fs/bad_inode.c @@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ static int bad_inode_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, static int bad_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask, unsigned int flags) { - if (flags & IPERM_FLAG_RCU) - return -ECHILD; - return -EIO; } -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2