From f44cc269a1c148ad83332d85fe54607e8874ca79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kent Overstreet Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:52:39 -0400 Subject: bcachefs: fix seqmutex_relock() We were grabbing the sequence number before unlock incremented it - fix this by moving the increment to seqmutex_lock() (so the seqmutex_relock() failure path skips the mutex_trylock()), and returning the sequence number from unlock(), to make the API simpler and safer. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h') diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h b/fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h index c1860d8163fb..c4b3d8d3f414 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h +++ b/fs/bcachefs/seqmutex.h @@ -19,17 +19,14 @@ static inline bool seqmutex_trylock(struct seqmutex *lock) static inline void seqmutex_lock(struct seqmutex *lock) { mutex_lock(&lock->lock); -} - -static inline void seqmutex_unlock(struct seqmutex *lock) -{ lock->seq++; - mutex_unlock(&lock->lock); } -static inline u32 seqmutex_seq(struct seqmutex *lock) +static inline u32 seqmutex_unlock(struct seqmutex *lock) { - return lock->seq; + u32 seq = lock->seq; + mutex_unlock(&lock->lock); + return seq; } static inline bool seqmutex_relock(struct seqmutex *lock, u32 seq) -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2