From 6bef4d317193d3badbbfa3f3c593758ace84a629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Paris Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:43:04 +0000 Subject: Btrfs: use RB_ROOT to intialize rb_trees instead of setting rb_node to NULL btrfs inialize rb trees in quite a number of places by settin rb_node = NULL; The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 in the linux-next tree adds a new field to that struct which needs to be NULL for the new rbtree library code to work properly. This patch uses RB_ROOT as the intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd. Without the patch I get a panic. Signed-off-by: Eric Paris Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/relocation.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c index ab7ab5318745..0109e5606bad 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c @@ -170,14 +170,14 @@ struct async_merge { static void mapping_tree_init(struct mapping_tree *tree) { - tree->rb_root.rb_node = NULL; + tree->rb_root = RB_ROOT; spin_lock_init(&tree->lock); } static void backref_cache_init(struct backref_cache *cache) { int i; - cache->rb_root.rb_node = NULL; + cache->rb_root = RB_ROOT; for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL; i++) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->pending[i]); spin_lock_init(&cache->lock); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2