From e21294a7aaae32c5d7154b187113a04db5852e37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:50:57 -0500
Subject: signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
wanted.  So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/exec.c')

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a098c133d8d7..ac7b51b51f38 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ out:
 	 * SIGSEGV.
 	 */
 	if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
-		force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
+		force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
 
 out_unmark:
 	current->fs->in_exec = 0;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2