From 60aa49243d09afc873f082567d2e3c16634ced84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:52:56 -0700 Subject: Rationalize fasync return values Most fasync implementations do something like: return fasync_helper(...); But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used in at least one place. Thus, a number of other drivers do: err = fasync_helper(...); if (err < 0) return err; return 0; In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called. Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- fs/fcntl.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/fcntl.c') diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c index 431bb6459273..d865ca66ccba 100644 --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -184,6 +184,8 @@ static int setfl(int fd, struct file * filp, unsigned long arg) error = filp->f_op->fasync(fd, filp, (arg & FASYNC) != 0); if (error < 0) goto out; + if (error > 0) + error = 0; } spin_lock(&filp->f_lock); filp->f_flags = (arg & SETFL_MASK) | (filp->f_flags & ~SETFL_MASK); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2