From 202bc57b675601bc07b5942369ecc16af64d1b95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 17:17:36 +0000 Subject: netfs: Don't use certain unnecessary folio_*() functions Filesystems should use folio->index and folio->mapping, instead of folio_index(folio), folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() since they know that it's in the pagecache. Change this automagically with: perl -p -i -e 's/folio_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/netfs/*.c perl -p -i -e 's/folio_file_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/netfs/*.c perl -p -i -e 's/folio_index[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->index/g' fs/netfs/*.c Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Jeff Layton cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/netfs/io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/netfs/io.c') diff --git a/fs/netfs/io.c b/fs/netfs/io.c index 4309edf33862..e8ff1e61ce79 100644 --- a/fs/netfs/io.c +++ b/fs/netfs/io.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void netfs_rreq_unmark_after_write(struct netfs_io_request *rreq, /* We might have multiple writes from the same huge * folio, but we mustn't unlock a folio more than once. */ - if (have_unlocked && folio_index(folio) <= unlocked) + if (have_unlocked && folio->index <= unlocked) continue; unlocked = folio_next_index(folio) - 1; trace_netfs_folio(folio, netfs_folio_trace_end_copy); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2