From 3ee1a1fc39819906f04d6c62c180e760cd3a689d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 18:29:59 +0100 Subject: cifs: Cut over to using netfslib Make the cifs filesystem use netfslib to handle reading and writing on behalf of cifs. The changes include: (1) Various read_iter/write_iter type functions are turned into wrappers around netfslib API functions or are pointed directly at those functions: cifs_file_direct{,_nobrl}_ops switch to use netfs_unbuffered_read_iter and netfs_unbuffered_write_iter. Large pieces of code that will be removed are #if'd out and will be removed in subsequent patches. [?] Why does cifs mark the page dirty in the destination buffer of a DIO read? Should that happen automatically? Does netfs need to do that? Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> cc: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com> cc: Rohith Surabattula <rohiths.msft@gmail.com> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- fs/netfs/io.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/netfs') diff --git a/fs/netfs/io.c b/fs/netfs/io.c index 6cfecfcd02e1..c93851b98368 100644 --- a/fs/netfs/io.c +++ b/fs/netfs/io.c @@ -213,8 +213,13 @@ static void netfs_rreq_assess_dio(struct netfs_io_request *rreq) unsigned int i; size_t transferred = 0; - for (i = 0; i < rreq->direct_bv_count; i++) + for (i = 0; i < rreq->direct_bv_count; i++) { flush_dcache_page(rreq->direct_bv[i].bv_page); + // TODO: cifs marks pages in the destination buffer + // dirty under some circumstances after a read. Do we + // need to do that too? + set_page_dirty(rreq->direct_bv[i].bv_page); + } list_for_each_entry(subreq, &rreq->subrequests, rreq_link) { if (subreq->error || subreq->transferred == 0) -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2