From 19cd56c48da58bebc3a638e036bcab69469acd27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:12 -0700 Subject: procfs: fix /proc/softirqs formatting The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making i's value be printed too far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit neater. Currently: CPU0 HI: 0 TIMER: 599792 NET_TX: 2 NET_RX: 6 BLOCK: 80807 BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 TASKLET: 20012 SCHED: 0 HRTIMER: 63 RCU: 619279 With patch: CPU0 HI: 0 TIMER: 585582 NET_TX: 2 NET_RX: 6 BLOCK: 80320 BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 TASKLET: 19287 SCHED: 0 HRTIMER: 62 RCU: 604441 Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Acked-by: Keika Kobayashi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/proc') diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c index 1807c2419f17..37994737c983 100644 --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v) { int i, j; - seq_printf(p, " "); + seq_printf(p, " "); for_each_possible_cpu(i) seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i); seq_printf(p, "\n"); for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) { - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]); + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]); for_each_possible_cpu(j) seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j)); seq_printf(p, "\n"); -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2