From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h') diff --git a/include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h b/include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h index 1f79b20918b1..4334106f44c3 100644 --- a/include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h +++ b/include/linux/dw_apb_timer.h @@ -50,6 +50,6 @@ dw_apb_clocksource_init(unsigned rating, const char *name, void __iomem *base, unsigned long freq); void dw_apb_clocksource_register(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs); void dw_apb_clocksource_start(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs); -cycle_t dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs); +u64 dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs); #endif /* __DW_APB_TIMER_H__ */ -- cgit v1.3.1