From 542bcea4be866b14b3a5c8e90773329066656c43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qingfang DENG Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:16:11 +0800 Subject: net: page_pool: use in_softirq() instead We use BH context only for synchronization, so we don't care if it's actually serving softirq or not. As a side node, in case of threaded NAPI, in_serving_softirq() will return false because it's in process context with BH off, making page_pool_recycle_in_cache() unreachable. Signed-off-by: Qingfang DENG Tested-by: Felix Fietkau Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/page_pool.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/core/page_pool.c') diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c index 9b203d8660e4..193c18799865 100644 --- a/net/core/page_pool.c +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c @@ -511,8 +511,8 @@ static void page_pool_return_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page) static bool page_pool_recycle_in_ring(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page) { int ret; - /* BH protection not needed if current is serving softirq */ - if (in_serving_softirq()) + /* BH protection not needed if current is softirq */ + if (in_softirq()) ret = ptr_ring_produce(&pool->ring, page); else ret = ptr_ring_produce_bh(&pool->ring, page); @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page, page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, dma_sync_size); - if (allow_direct && in_serving_softirq() && + if (allow_direct && in_softirq() && page_pool_recycle_in_cache(page, pool)) return NULL; -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2