From d37a369790774af66a4aee61a188384d21b17a43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:08:07 -0300 Subject: perf evsel: Fix attr.exclude_kernel setting for default cycles:p To allow probing the max attr.precise_ip setting for non-root users we unconditionally set attr.exclude_kernel, which makes the detection work but should be done only for !root, fix it. Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Fixes: 97365e81366f ("perf evsel: Set attr.exclude_kernel when probing max attr.precise_ip") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-bl6bbxzxloonzvm4nvt7oqgj@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c index 87b431886670..f2a1876d268e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evsel__new_cycles(void) struct perf_event_attr attr = { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, - .exclude_kernel = 1, + .exclude_kernel = geteuid() != 0, }; struct perf_evsel *evsel; -- cgit v1.3.1 From ede5626d303b721dd02246a3850380943c24e380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:19:25 -0300 Subject: perf evsel: State in the default event name if attr.exclude_kernel is set When no event is specified perf will use the "cycles" hardware event with the highest precision available in the processor, and excluding kernel events for non-root users, so make that clear in the event name by setting the "u" event modifier, i.e. "cycles:upp". E.g.: The default for root: # perf record usleep 1 # perf evlist -v cycles:ppp: ..., precise_ip: 3, exclude_kernel: 0, ... # And for !root: $ perf record usleep 1 $ perf evlist -v cycles:uppp: ... , precise_ip: 3, exclude_kernel: 1, ... $ Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lf29zcdl422i9knrgde0uwy3@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c index f2a1876d268e..413f74df08de 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c @@ -298,8 +298,10 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evsel__new_cycles(void) goto out; /* use asprintf() because free(evsel) assumes name is allocated */ - if (asprintf(&evsel->name, "cycles%.*s", - attr.precise_ip ? attr.precise_ip + 1 : 0, ":ppp") < 0) + if (asprintf(&evsel->name, "cycles%s%s%.*s", + (attr.precise_ip || attr.exclude_kernel) ? ":" : "", + attr.exclude_kernel ? "u" : "", + attr.precise_ip ? attr.precise_ip + 1 : 0, "ppp") < 0) goto error_free; out: return evsel; -- cgit v1.3.1 From 80f62589fa52f530cffc50e78c0b5a2ae572d61e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jin Yao Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:01:44 +0800 Subject: perf annotate: Fix broken arrow at row 0 connecting jmp instruction to its target MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit When the jump instruction is displayed at the row 0 in annotate view, the arrow is broken. An example: 16.86 │ ┌──je 82 0.01 │ movsd (%rsp),%xmm0 │ movsd 0x8(%rsp),%xmm4 │ movsd 0x8(%rsp),%xmm1 │ movsd (%rsp),%xmm3 │ divsd %xmm4,%xmm0 │ divsd %xmm3,%xmm1 │ movsd (%rsp),%xmm2 │ addsd %xmm1,%xmm0 │ addsd %xmm2,%xmm0 │ movsd %xmm0,(%rsp) │82: sub $0x1,%ebx 83.03 │ ↑ jne 38 │ add $0x10,%rsp │ xor %eax,%eax │ pop %rbx │ ← retq The patch increments the row number before checking with 0. Signed-off-by: Yao Jin Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kan Liang Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 944e1abed9e1 ("perf ui browser: Add method to draw up/down arrow line") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496901704-30275-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/ui/browser.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browser.c b/tools/perf/ui/browser.c index a4d3762cd825..83874b0e266c 100644 --- a/tools/perf/ui/browser.c +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browser.c @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static void __ui_browser__line_arrow_down(struct ui_browser *browser, ui_browser__gotorc(browser, row, column + 1); SLsmg_draw_hline(2); - if (row++ == 0) + if (++row == 0) goto out; } else row = 0; -- cgit v1.3.1 From 4b1303d0b01440f224cf81493b7e8e43d9b4965e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:21:40 -0300 Subject: perf symbols: Accept zero as the kernel base address Which is the case in S/390, where symbols were not being resolved because machine__get_kernel_start was only setting machine->kernel_start when the just successfully loaded kernel symtab had its map->start set to !0, when it was left at (1ULL << 63) assuming a partitioning of the address space for user/kernel, which is not the case in S/390 nor in Sparc. So just check if map__load() was successfull and set machine->kernel_start to zero, fixing kernel symbol resolution on S/390. Test performed by Thomas: ---- I like this patch. I have done a new build and removed all my debug output to start from scratch. Without your patch I get this: # Samples: 4 of event 'cpu-clock' # Event count (approx.): 1000000 # # Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol # ........ ........ ....... ................ ........................ 75.00% 0.00% true [unknown] [k] 0x00000000004bedda | ---0x4bedda | |--50.00%--0x42693a | | | --25.00%--0x2a72e0 | 0x2af0ca | 0x3d1003fe4c0 | --25.00%--0x4272bc 0x26fa84 and with your patch (I just rebuilt the perf tool, nothing else and used the same perf.data file as input): # Samples: 4 of event 'cpu-clock' # Event count (approx.): 1000000 # # Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol # ........ ........ ....... .......................... .................................. 75.00% 0.00% true [kernel.vmlinux] [k] pgm_check_handler | ---pgm_check_handler do_dat_exception handle_mm_fault __handle_mm_fault filemap_map_pages | |--25.00%--rcu_read_lock_held | rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online | 0x3d1003ff4c0 | --25.00%--lock_release Looks good to me.... ---- Reported-and-Tested-by: Thomas-Mich Richter Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Hendrik Brueckner Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Cc: Zvonko Kosic Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dk0n1uzmbe0tbthrpfqlx6bz@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c index 5de2b86b9880..2e9eb6aa3ce2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c @@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine *machine) machine->kernel_start = 1ULL << 63; if (map) { err = map__load(map); - if (map->start) + if (!err) machine->kernel_start = map->start; } return err; -- cgit v1.3.1 From d655490417ee22da3267fe6592a0ec2023c3c0db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:22 +0200 Subject: bpf: allow to specify log level and reduce it for test_verifier For the test_verifier case, it's quite hard to parse log level 2 to figure out what's causing an issue when used to log level 1. We do want to use bpf_verify_program() in order to simulate some of the tests with strict alignment. So just add an argument to pass the level and put it to 1 for test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 4 ++-- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index 7e0405e1651d..412a7c82995a 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, const char *license, __u32 kern_version, - char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz) + char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level) { union bpf_attr attr; @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, attr.license = ptr_to_u64(license); attr.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(log_buf); attr.log_size = log_buf_sz; - attr.log_level = 2; + attr.log_level = log_level; log_buf[0] = 0; attr.kern_version = kern_version; attr.prog_flags = strict_alignment ? BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT : 0; diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h index 16de44a14b48..418c86e69bcb 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, const char *license, __u32 kern_version, - char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz); + char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level); int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value, __u64 flags); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index bccebd935907..29793694cbc7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int do_test_single(struct bpf_align_test *test) prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog, prog_len, 1, "GPL", 0, - bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog)); + bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 2); if (fd_prog < 0) { printf("Failed to load program.\n"); printf("%s", bpf_vlog); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 404aec520812..f4d0a1de3925 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5633,7 +5633,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog, prog_len, test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, - "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog)); + "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1); expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ? test->result_unpriv : test->result; -- cgit v1.3.1 From a1502132866fd2d2705eef4041dd6d7d849f48a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:23 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds Fix the few existing test cases that used mixed signed/unsigned bounds and switch them only to one flavor. Reason why we need this is that proper boundaries cannot be derived from mixed tests. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index f4d0a1de3925..64b39d37d91d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -4969,7 +4969,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val), 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -5050,7 +5050,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), -- cgit v1.3.1 From b712296a41ce0a114895fdff68fc22aada165b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:24 +0200 Subject: bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks These failed due to a bug in verifier bounds handling. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 64b39d37d91d..48b7997c0ae7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5510,6 +5510,58 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, positive bounds", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 4, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.3.1 From 8641250251bfcd93479c71783c6792ae3325d7e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:25 +0200 Subject: bpf: more tests for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks Add a couple of more test cases to BPF selftests that are related to mixed signed and unsigned checks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 418 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 48b7997c0ae7..af7d173910f4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5562,6 +5562,424 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 2", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 3", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 4", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 5", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 4), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 4), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 6", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, -512), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_6, 5), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_4, 1, 4), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_10, -512, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_skb_load_bytes), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned", + .errstr = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 7", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1024 * 1024 * 1024), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 8", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1024 * 1024 * 1024 + 1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 9", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 10), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, -9223372036854775808ULL), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 11", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 12", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + /* Dead branch. */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 13", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 14", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_7, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_7, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_7, 4, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 15", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_9, 42, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -7), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 4 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 16", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, 1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.3.1 From efcb521943a8df5210f16f312037c2edc3e1449f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lin Ma Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:05:53 +0800 Subject: tools/kvm_stat: use variables instead of hard paths in help output Using variables instead of hard paths makes the requirements information more accurate. Signed-off-by: Lin Ma Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat index dd8f00cfb8b4..5704044b1c0b 100755 --- a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat +++ b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat @@ -1413,8 +1413,8 @@ performance. Requirements: - Access to: - /sys/kernel/debug/kvm - /sys/kernel/debug/trace/events/* + %s + %s/events/* /proc/pid/task - /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid < 1 if user has no CAP_SYS_ADMIN and perf events are used. @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ Interactive Commands: s set update interval x toggle reporting of stats for individual child trace events Press any other key to refresh statistics immediately. -""" +""" % (PATH_DEBUGFS_KVM, PATH_DEBUGFS_TRACING) class PlainHelpFormatter(optparse.IndentedHelpFormatter): def format_description(self, description): -- cgit v1.3.1 From 67fbcd62f54d4503e3dc63b68af1c6757b74e050 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lin Ma Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:05:54 +0800 Subject: tools/kvm_stat: add '-f help' to get the available event list Signed-off-by: Lin Ma Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat index 5704044b1c0b..32283d88701a 100755 --- a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat +++ b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ class Provider(object): @staticmethod def is_field_wanted(fields_filter, field): """Indicate whether field is valid according to fields_filter.""" - if not fields_filter: + if not fields_filter or fields_filter == "help": return True return re.match(fields_filter, field) is not None @@ -1496,7 +1496,8 @@ Press any other key to refresh statistics immediately. action='store', default=DEFAULT_REGEX, dest='fields', - help='fields to display (regex)', + help='''fields to display (regex) + "-f help" for a list of available events''', ) optparser.add_option('-p', '--pid', action='store', @@ -1559,6 +1560,17 @@ def main(): stats = Stats(options) + if options.fields == "help": + event_list = "\n" + s = stats.get() + for key in s.keys(): + if key.find('(') != -1: + key = key[0:key.find('(')] + if event_list.find('\n' + key + '\n') == -1: + event_list += key + '\n' + sys.stdout.write(event_list) + return "" + if options.log: log(stats) elif not options.once: -- cgit v1.3.1