summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>2024-10-16 17:54:58 +0800
committerCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>2024-11-04 12:51:50 +0000
commit263e22d6bd1f8a12dc2e770cf190f8dfb31f867e (patch)
tree8d88f04fb0df132edf6239a17cfc18ac3fcbe53f
parent525fd6a1b34ea8ce42e12db38380eed0efefb5d5 (diff)
ACPI: GTDT: Tighten the check for the array of platform timer structures
As suggested by Marc and Lorenzo, first we need to check whether the platform_timer entry pointer is within gtdt bounds (< gtdt_end) before de-referencing what it points at to detect the length of the platform timer struct and then check that the length of current platform_timer struct is also valid, i.e. the length is not zero and within gtdt_end. Now next_platform_timer() only checks against gtdt_end for the entry of subsequent platform timer without checking the length of it and will not report error if the check failed and the existing check in function acpi_gtdt_init() is also not enough. Modify the for_each_platform_timer() iterator and use it combined with a dedicated check function platform_timer_valid() to do the check against table length (gtdt_end) for each element of platform timer array in function acpi_gtdt_init(), making sure that both their entry and length actually fit in the table. Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016095458.34126-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c29
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
index c0e77c1c8e09..d7c4e1b9915b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/gtdt.c
@@ -36,19 +36,25 @@ struct acpi_gtdt_descriptor {
static struct acpi_gtdt_descriptor acpi_gtdt_desc __initdata;
-static inline __init void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
+static __init bool platform_timer_valid(void *platform_timer)
{
struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
- platform_timer += gh->length;
- if (platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end)
- return platform_timer;
+ return (platform_timer >= (void *)(acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt + 1) &&
+ platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end &&
+ gh->length != 0 &&
+ platform_timer + gh->length <= acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end);
+}
+
+static __init void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
+{
+ struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
- return NULL;
+ return platform_timer + gh->length;
}
#define for_each_platform_timer(_g) \
- for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer; _g; \
+ for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer; platform_timer_valid(_g);\
_g = next_platform_timer(_g))
static inline bool is_timer_block(void *platform_timer)
@@ -157,6 +163,7 @@ int __init acpi_gtdt_init(struct acpi_table_header *table,
{
void *platform_timer;
struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt;
+ int cnt = 0;
gtdt = container_of(table, struct acpi_table_gtdt, header);
acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt = gtdt;
@@ -176,12 +183,16 @@ int __init acpi_gtdt_init(struct acpi_table_header *table,
return 0;
}
- platform_timer = (void *)gtdt + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
- if (platform_timer < (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
+ acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = (void *)gtdt + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
+ for_each_platform_timer(platform_timer)
+ cnt++;
+
+ if (cnt != gtdt->platform_timer_count) {
+ acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = NULL;
pr_err(FW_BUG "invalid timer data.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer = platform_timer;
+
if (platform_timer_count)
*platform_timer_count = gtdt->platform_timer_count;