diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-06-20 14:38:21 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-06-20 14:38:21 -0700 |
| commit | 4b0c7a1ba09386e26cf9e55cd375af8e0f48662e (patch) | |
| tree | 7f5496731707c9879c494dbcbb855a4d59cfa4b4 | |
| parent | 99ec1ed7c2ed358280588ab1d013387e8c7a9333 (diff) | |
| parent | a7299a18a179a9713651fce9ad00972a633c14a9 (diff) | |
Merge tag 'for-6.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fix from David Sterba:
"One more regression fix for an assertion failure that uncovered a
nasty problem with stripe calculations. This is caused by a u32
overflow when there are enough devices. The fstests require 6 so this
hasn't been caught, I was able to hit it with 8.
The fix is minimal and only adds u64 casts, we'll clean that up later.
I did various additional tests to be sure"
* tag 'for-6.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix u32 overflows when left shifting stripe_nr
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 841e799dece5..e60beb14852a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -5975,12 +5975,12 @@ struct btrfs_discard_stripe *btrfs_map_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, stripe_nr = offset >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT; /* stripe_offset is the offset of this block in its stripe */ - stripe_offset = offset - (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); + stripe_offset = offset - ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); stripe_nr_end = round_up(offset + length, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT; stripe_cnt = stripe_nr_end - stripe_nr; - stripe_end_offset = (stripe_nr_end << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT) - + stripe_end_offset = ((u64)stripe_nr_end << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT) - (offset + length); /* * after this, stripe_nr is the number of stripes on this @@ -6023,7 +6023,7 @@ struct btrfs_discard_stripe *btrfs_map_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, for (i = 0; i < *num_stripes; i++) { stripes[i].physical = map->stripes[stripe_index].physical + - stripe_offset + (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); + stripe_offset + ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); stripes[i].dev = map->stripes[stripe_index].dev; if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 | @@ -6196,9 +6196,11 @@ static u64 btrfs_max_io_len(struct map_lookup *map, enum btrfs_map_op op, * not ensured to be power of 2. */ *full_stripe_start = - rounddown(*stripe_nr, nr_data_stripes(map)) << + (u64)rounddown(*stripe_nr, nr_data_stripes(map)) << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT; + ASSERT(*full_stripe_start + full_stripe_len > offset); + ASSERT(*full_stripe_start <= offset); /* * For writes to RAID56, allow to write a full stripe set, but * no straddling of stripe sets. @@ -6221,7 +6223,7 @@ static void set_io_stripe(struct btrfs_io_stripe *dst, const struct map_lookup * { dst->dev = map->stripes[stripe_index].dev; dst->physical = map->stripes[stripe_index].physical + - stripe_offset + (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); + stripe_offset + ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT); } int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op, |