diff options
| author | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2023-11-12 16:56:19 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2023-12-20 12:09:32 -0500 |
| commit | 743cde7419bc9580a71a7e6f15eda66d6d8e71c2 (patch) | |
| tree | 6624acb7af40b44856c4bf08ae68c0edd10e5d07 | |
| parent | 96931dfe437cbd480fcfa72bd05b41b9ef15522e (diff) | |
bfs_add_entry(): get rid of pointless ->d_name.len checks
First of all, any dentry getting here would have passed bfs_lookup(),
so it it passed ENAMETOOLONG check there, there's no need to
repeat it. And we are not going to get dentries with zero name length -
that check ultimately comes from ext2 and it's as pointless here as it
used to be there.
Acked-by: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/bfs/dir.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/bfs/dir.c b/fs/bfs/dir.c index fbc4ae80a4b2..c375e22c4c0c 100644 --- a/fs/bfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/bfs/dir.c @@ -275,11 +275,6 @@ static int bfs_add_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *child, int ino) dprintf("name=%s, namelen=%d\n", name, namelen); - if (!namelen) - return -ENOENT; - if (namelen > BFS_NAMELEN) - return -ENAMETOOLONG; - sblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_sblock; eblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_eblock; for (block = sblock; block <= eblock; block++) { |