summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSouradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>2024-01-28 22:21:07 -0800
committerPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2024-02-01 13:06:40 +0100
commit8afefc361209b726aa5886833384d048412b159e (patch)
tree79a26332da7b6d3e0be461a15fe7316f84ec7c55
parent91bfe210e196780667c94c2795103ca6013233fc (diff)
net: mana: Assigning IRQ affinity on HT cores
Existing MANA design assigns IRQ to every CPU, including sibling hyper-threads. This may cause multiple IRQs to be active simultaneously in the same core and may reduce the network performance. Improve the performance by assigning IRQ to non sibling CPUs in local NUMA node. The performance improvement we are getting using ntttcp with following patch is around 15 percent against existing design and approximately 11 percent, when trying to assign one IRQ in each core across NUMA nodes, if enough cores are present. The change will improve the performance for the system with high number of CPU, where number of CPUs in a node is more than 64 CPUs. Nodes with 64 CPUs or less than 64 CPUs will not be affected by this change. The performance study was done using ntttcp tool in Azure. The node had 2 nodes with 32 cores each, total 128 vCPU and number of channels were 32 for 32 RX rings. The below table shows a comparison between existing design and new design: IRQ node-num core-num CPU performance(%) 1 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0-1 0 2 0 | 0 0 | 1 1 | 2-3 3 3 0 | 0 1 | 2 2 | 4-5 10 4 0 | 0 1 | 3 3 | 6-7 15 5 0 | 0 2 | 4 4 | 8-9 15 ... ... 25 0 | 0 12| 24 24| 48-49 12 ... 32 0 | 0 15| 31 31| 62-63 12 33 0 | 0 16| 0 32| 0-1 10 ... 64 0 | 0 31| 31 63| 62-63 0 Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c61
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
index 05a0ac054823..1332db9a08eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ void mana_gd_free_res_map(struct gdma_resource *r)
r->size = 0;
}
-static __maybe_unused int irq_setup(unsigned int *irqs, unsigned int len, int node)
+static int irq_setup(unsigned int *irqs, unsigned int len, int node)
{
const struct cpumask *next, *prev = cpu_none_mask;
cpumask_var_t cpus __free(free_cpumask_var);
@@ -1280,13 +1280,16 @@ done:
static int mana_gd_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
- unsigned int max_queues_per_port = num_online_cpus();
struct gdma_context *gc = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ unsigned int max_queues_per_port;
struct gdma_irq_context *gic;
unsigned int max_irqs, cpu;
- int nvec, irq;
+ int start_irq_index = 1;
+ int nvec, *irqs, irq;
int err, i = 0, j;
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ max_queues_per_port = num_online_cpus();
if (max_queues_per_port > MANA_MAX_NUM_QUEUES)
max_queues_per_port = MANA_MAX_NUM_QUEUES;
@@ -1294,8 +1297,18 @@ static int mana_gd_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
max_irqs = max_queues_per_port + 1;
nvec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 2, max_irqs, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
- if (nvec < 0)
+ if (nvec < 0) {
+ cpus_read_unlock();
return nvec;
+ }
+ if (nvec <= num_online_cpus())
+ start_irq_index = 0;
+
+ irqs = kmalloc_array((nvec - start_irq_index), sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!irqs) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_irq_vector;
+ }
gc->irq_contexts = kcalloc(nvec, sizeof(struct gdma_irq_context),
GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1323,17 +1336,41 @@ static int mana_gd_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
goto free_irq;
}
- err = request_irq(irq, mana_gd_intr, 0, gic->name, gic);
- if (err)
- goto free_irq;
-
- cpu = cpumask_local_spread(i, gc->numa_node);
- irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
+ if (!i) {
+ err = request_irq(irq, mana_gd_intr, 0, gic->name, gic);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_irq;
+
+ /* If number of IRQ is one extra than number of online CPUs,
+ * then we need to assign IRQ0 (hwc irq) and IRQ1 to
+ * same CPU.
+ * Else we will use different CPUs for IRQ0 and IRQ1.
+ * Also we are using cpumask_local_spread instead of
+ * cpumask_first for the node, because the node can be
+ * mem only.
+ */
+ if (start_irq_index) {
+ cpu = cpumask_local_spread(i, gc->numa_node);
+ irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
+ } else {
+ irqs[start_irq_index] = irq;
+ }
+ } else {
+ irqs[i - start_irq_index] = irq;
+ err = request_irq(irqs[i - start_irq_index], mana_gd_intr, 0,
+ gic->name, gic);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_irq;
+ }
}
+ err = irq_setup(irqs, (nvec - start_irq_index), gc->numa_node);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_irq;
+
gc->max_num_msix = nvec;
gc->num_msix_usable = nvec;
-
+ cpus_read_unlock();
return 0;
free_irq:
@@ -1346,8 +1383,10 @@ free_irq:
}
kfree(gc->irq_contexts);
+ kfree(irqs);
gc->irq_contexts = NULL;
free_irq_vector:
+ cpus_read_unlock();
pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
return err;
}