diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-09-09 07:05:15 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-09-09 07:05:15 -0700 |
commit | 9a5682765a2e5f93cf2fe7b612b8072b18f0c68a (patch) | |
tree | a5a7667a1089a367677257ad36b3e3f144405b42 /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | |
parent | 3567994a05ba6490f6055650fbb892c926ae7fca (diff) | |
parent | 9bc4f28af75a91aea0ae383f50b0a430c4509303 (diff) |
Merge branch 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A set of fixes for x86:
- Prevent multiplication result truncation on 32bit. Introduced with
the early timestamp reworrk.
- Ensure microcode revision storage to be consistent under all
circumstances
- Prevent write tearing of PTEs
- Prevent confusion of user and kernel reegisters when dumping fatal
signals verbosely
- Make an error return value in a failure path of the vector
allocation negative. Returning EINVAL might the caller assume
success and causes further wreckage.
- A trivial kernel doc warning fix"
* 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/mm: Use WRITE_ONCE() when setting PTEs
x86/apic/vector: Make error return value negative
x86/process: Don't mix user/kernel regs in 64bit __show_regs()
x86/tsc: Prevent result truncation on 32bit
x86: Fix kernel-doc atomic.h warnings
x86/microcode: Update the new microcode revision unconditionally
x86/microcode: Make sure boot_cpu_data.microcode is up-to-date
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c index 0624957aa068..07b5fc00b188 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) struct microcode_amd *mc_amd; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; struct ucode_patch *p; + enum ucode_state ret; u32 rev, dummy; BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu); @@ -521,9 +522,8 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) /* need to apply patch? */ if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { - c->microcode = rev; - uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; - return UCODE_OK; + ret = UCODE_OK; + goto out; } if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) { @@ -531,13 +531,21 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); return UCODE_ERROR; } - pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, - mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); - uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; - c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; + rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; + ret = UCODE_UPDATED; + + pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, rev); - return UCODE_UPDATED; +out: + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + c->microcode = rev; + + /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */ + if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) + boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev; + + return ret; } static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) |